Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine ((DICM,volume 213))

  • 114 Accesses

Abstract

Esophageal chest pain has come under critical scrutiny recently [1]. Motility disorders in particular have fallen out of favor as a cause of chest pain [13], to the extent that chest pain of uncertain origin has now become a rare indication for esophageal manometry in the United States [4]. The reasons for this include changing perceptions about the relevance of the commonest manometric diagnosis, the so called “nutcracker esophagus” [2,3,5], the effect of stress on manometric parameters [2,6], the lack of response of chest pain to motility modifying drugs [7] and the finding in several studies employing prolonged ambulatory motility recording that chest pain events in patients with chest pain of uncertain origin are rarely accompanied by disturbances of esophageal motility [8-10]. Gastro-esophageal reflux (GOR) remains the single commonest disorder resulting in atypical chest pain [11,12], but it will continue to remain unrecognized and untreated without appropriate investigation: indeed, the importance of carrying out 24 hour esophageal pH monitoring in all such individuals, even those with manometric abnormalities, though proposed more than 12 years ago [11,12], has only gradually received acceptance [13,14]. Abnormal esophageal sensory perception is an emerging concept, with new conditions of hypersensitive, hyperreactive [15] or irritable esophagus [16] being proposed. The value of provocation with esophageal acid perfusion [17] and pharmacological agents such as edrophonium [18] has been called into question. There is however a danger of allowing the pendulum to swing too far: it is premature to dismiss provocation tests and motility disorders entirely. The aim of this review is to provide a balanced overview with particular emphasis on the value of gastroenterological investigations in patients with chest pain of uncertain origin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goyal RK. Changing focus on unexplained esophageal chest pain. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:1008–1011.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Valori RM. Nutcracker, neurosis or sampling bias? Gut 1990; 31: 736–737.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kahrilas PJ. Nutcracker esophagus: an idea whose time has gone? Am J Gastroenterol. 1993; 88:167–169.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Alrakawi A, Clouse RE. Change in esophageal manometric patterns over a l0year period parallels a change in referral indication. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: A57.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dalton CB, Castell DO, Richter JE. The changing faces of the nutcracker esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 1988; 83: 623–628.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson KO, Dalton CB, Bradley LA, Richter JE. Stress induces alteration of esophageal pressures in healthy volunteers and non-cardiac chest pain patients. Dig Dis Sci 1989; 34: 83–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Richter JE, Daiton CB, Bradley LA, Castell DO. Oral nifedipine in the treatment of noncardiac chest pain in patients with the nutcracker esophagus. Gastroenterology 1987; 93: 21–28.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Peters L, Maas L, Petty D et al. Spontaneous noncardiae chest pain: evaluation by 24-hour ambulatory esophageal motility and pH monitoring. Gastroenterology 1988; 94: 878–886.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Soffer EE, Scalabrini P, Wingate DL. Spontaneous non-cardiac chest pain: value of ambulatory esophageal pH and motility monitoring. Dig Dis Sci 1989; 34: 1651–1655.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Frobert O, Funch-Jensen P, Bagger JP. Diagnostic value of esophageal studies in patients with angina-like chest pain and normal coronary arteriograms. Ann Intern Med 1996; 124: 959–969.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Demeester TR, O’Sullivan GC, Bermudez G et al. Esophageal function in patients with angina-type chest pain and normal coronary angiograms. Ann Surg 1982; 196: 488–498.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. de Caestecker JS, Blackwell JN, Brown J, Heading RC. The oesophagus as a cause of recurrent chest pain: which patients should be investigated and which tests used? Lancet 1985; ii: 1143–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hewson EG, Sinclair JW, Dalton CB, Richter JE. Twenty four hour esophageal pH monitoring: the most useful test for evaluating noncardiac chest pain. Am J Med 1991; 90: 576–583.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Achem SR, Kolts BE, Wears R, Burton L, Richter JE. Chest pain associated with the nutcracker esophagus: a preliminary study of the role of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88: 187–192.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rao SSC, Gregersen H, Hayek B, Summers RW, Christensen J. Unexplained chest pain: the hypersensitive, hyperreactive, and poorly compliant esophagus. Ann Intern Med 1996; 124: 950–958.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vantrappen G, Janssens J, Ghillebert G. The irritable esophagus - a frequent cause of angina-like pain. Lancet 1987; i: 1232–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hewson EG, Sinclair JW, Dalton CB et al. Acid perfusion test: does it have a role in the assessment of non-cardiac chest pain? Gut 1989; 30: 305–310.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rose S, Achkar E, Falk GW, Fleshier B, Revta R. Interaction between patient and test administrator may influence the results of edrophonium provocative testing in patients with noncardiac chest pain. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88: 20–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dart AM, Alban Davies H, Griffith T, Henderson AH. Does it help to undiagnose angina? Eur Heart J 1983; 4: 461–462.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lam HGT, Dekker W, Kan G et al. Acute noncardiac chest pain in a coronary care unit: evaluation by 24-hour pressure and pH recording of the esophagus. Gastroenterology 1992; 102: 453–460.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Voskuil JH, Cramer J, Breumelhof R, Timmer R, Smout AJPM. Prevalence of esophageal disorders in patients with chest pain newly referred to a cardiologist. Chest 1996; 109: 1210–1214.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilcox RG, Roland JM, Hampton JR. Prognosis of patients with “chest pain ? cause”. Br Med J 1981; 282: 431–433.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Alban Davies H, Jones DB, Rhodes J, Newcombe RG. Angina-like esophageal pain: differentiation from cardiac pain by history. J Clin Gastroenterol 1985; 7: 477–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mehta AJ, de Caestecker JS, Camm AJ, Northfield TC. Gastro-esophageal reflux in patients with coronary artery disease: how common is it and does it matter? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1996; 8: 973–978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mehta A, de Caestecker JS, Northfield TC. Effect of nifedipine and atenolol on gastro-esophageal reflux. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1993; 5: 627 629.

    Google Scholar 

  26. de Caestecker JS. Chest pain with normal coronary arteriograms: esophageal abnormalities. The gastroenterologist’s view. In: “Angina Pectoris with normal coronary arteries: Syndrome X” ed. J-C Kaski. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994; p 31–64.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Richter JE. Angina-like chest pain: heart, esophagus, or something else? Chest 1996; 109: 1139–1140.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cannon RO. Causes of chest pain in patients with normal coronary angiograms: the eye of the beholder. Am J Cardiol 1988; 62: 306–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wells P. Cervical angina. Am Fam Phys 1997; 55: 2262–2264.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hamberg J, Lindahl O. Angina pectoris caused by thoracic spine disorders: clinical examination and treatment. Acta Med Scand 644 1981; Suppl.: 84–86.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Urschel HC, Razzuk MA, Hyland JW et al. Thoracic outlet syndrome masquerading as coronary artery disease (pseudoangina). Ann Thorac Surg 1973; 16: 239–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Brand DL. Chest pain of esophageal origin. In: Diseases of the esophagus. Eds Cohen S, Soloway RD. Pub Churchill Livingstone 1982; p. 137–159.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Long WB, Cohen S. The digestive tract as a cause of chest pain. Am Heart J 1980; 100: 567–572.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ravdin IS, Fitz-Hugh T, Wolferth CC, Barbier EA, Ravdin RG. Relation of gallstone disease to angina pectoris. Arch Surg 1955; 115: 1055–1062.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hampton AG, Beckwith JR, Wood JE. The relationship between heart disease and gallbladder disease. Ann Intern Med 1959; 50: 1135–1148.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Dworken HJ, Biel FJ, Machella TE. Supradiaphragmatic reference of pain from the colon. Gastroenterology 1952; 22:222–231.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bennett JR. Chest pain: heart or gullet? Br Med J 1983; 286: 1231–1232.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Dyer NH, Pridie RB. Incidence of hiatus hernia in asymptomatic subjects. Gut 1968; 9: 696–699.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Sellar RJ, de Caestecker JS, Heading RC. Barium radiology: a sensitive test for gastro-esophageal reflux. Clin Radio! 1987; 38: 303–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Cohen S. Esophageal motility disorders and their response to calcium channel antagonists: the sphinx revisited. Gastroenterology 1987; 93: 201–203.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Alban Davies H, Evans KT, Butler F, McKirdy H, Williams GT, Rhodes J. Diagnostic value of “bread-barium” swallow in patients with esophageal symptoms. Dig Dis Sci 1983; 28: 1094–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mattox HE, Richter JE, Sinclair JW, Price JE, Case LD. Gastroesophageal pH step-up inaccurately locates the proximal border of lower esophageal sphincter. Dig Dis Sci 1992; 37: 1185–1191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Howard PJ, Pryde A, Heading RC. Esophageal manometry during eating in the investigation of patients with chest pain or dysphagia. Gut 1989; 30: 1179–1186.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Barham CP, Gotley DC, Fowler A, Mills A, Alderson D. Diffuse esophageal spasm: diagnosis by 24 hour manometry. Gut 1997; 41: 151–155.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Richter JE, Castell DO. Diffuse esophageal spasm: a re-appraisal. Ann Intern Med 100: 242–245.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Smout AJPM, Lam HGTH, Breumelhof R. Clinical application of 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH and pressure monitoring. Scand J Gastroenterol 1992; 27 (Suppl 194): 30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Erode C, Armstrong D, Castiglione F, Cilluffo T, Riecken EO, Blum AL. Reproducibility of long-term ambulatory esophageal pH-manometry. Gastroenterology 1991; 100: 1630–1637.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lam HGT, Breumelhof R, Roelofs JMM, Van Berge Henegouwen GP, Smout AJPM. What is the optimum time window in the symptom analysis of 24-hour esophageal pressure and pH data? Dig Dis Sci 1994; 39: 402–409.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Ayres RCS, Robertson DA, Naylor K, Smith CL. Stress and esophageal motility in normal subjects and patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 1989; 30:1540–1–543.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Richter JE, Castell DO. 24 hour ambulatory oesophageal motility monitoring: how should motility data be analysed? Gut 1989; 30: 1040–1047.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. de Caestecker JS. Esophageal provocation tests-techniques and interpretation. In: Clinical measurements in Gastroenterology - Vol. 1: Esophagus. Eds, Evans D, Buckton G. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford 1997; 10: 233–244.

    Google Scholar 

  52. de Caestecker JS, Heading RC. Acid perfusion in the assessment of non-cardiac chest pain. Gut 1989; Gut 30: 1795–1796.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Richter JE, Hackshaw BT. Wu WC, Castell DO. Edrophonium: a useful provocative test for esophageal chest pain. Ann Intern Med 1985;. 103: 14–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. de Caestecker JS, Pryde A, Heading RC. Site and mechanism of pain perception with esophageal balloon distension and intravenous edrophonium in patients with esophageal chest pain. Gut 1992; 33: 580–586.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. de Caestecker JS, Pryde A, Heading RC. Comparison of intravenous edrophonium and esophageal acid perfusion during esophageal manometry in patients with non-cardiac chest pain. Gut 1988; 29: 1029–1034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ghillebert G, Janssens J, Vantrappen G, Nevens F, Piessen J. Ambulatory 24 hour intraesophageal pH and pressure recordings v. provocation tests in the diagnosis of chest pain of esophageal origin. Gut 1990;31: 738–744.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Mehta AJ, de Caestecker JS, Camm M, Northfield TC. Sensitisation to painful distension and abnormal sensory perception in the esophagus. Gastroenterology 1995; 108: 311–319.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Barish CF, Castell DO, Richter JE. Graded esophageal balloon distension: a new provocative test for noncardiac chest pain. Dig Dis Sci 1986; 31: 1292 1298.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Richter JE, Barish CF, Castell DO. Abnormal sensory perception in patients with esophageal chest pain. Gastroenterology 1986; 91: 845–852.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Kramer P, Hollander W. Comparison of experimental esophageal pain with clinical pain of angina pectoris and esophageal disease. Gastroenterology 1955; 29: 719–743.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Johnston BT, Castell DO. Intra-esophageal balloon distension and esophageal sensation in humans. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 1995; 7: 1221–1230.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Deschner WK, Maher KA, Cattau EL, Benjamin SB. Intraesophageal balloon distension versus drug provocation in the evaluation of non-cardiac chest pain. Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85: 938–943.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. DeVault KR, Castell DO. Esophageal balloon distension and cerebral evoked potential recording in the evaluation of unexplained chest pain. Am J Med 1992; 92 (Suppl 5A): 20S -26S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Smout AJPM, DeVore MS, Dalton CD, Castell DO. Cerebral potentials evoked by esophageal distension in patients with noncardiac chest pain. Gut 1992; 33: 298–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Gignoux C, Bost R, Hostein J et al. Role of upper esophageal reflex and belch reflex dysfunctions in noncardiac chest pain. Dig Dis Sci 1993; 38: 1909–1914;

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Fas R, Fennerty MB, Yalam JM, Camargo L, Garewal H, Sampliner RE. Evaluation of the “omeprazole test” in patients with noncardiac chest pain. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: A730.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Talley NJ. Non-ulcer dyspepsia: myths and realities. Aliment. Phannacol. Therap. 1991; 5: 145–162.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Castell DO. Omeprazole works best when used properly. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1996; 8: 413–414.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Hendel J, Hendel L, Hage E, Hendel J, Aggestrup S, Nielsen OH. Monitoring of omeprazole treatment in gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1996; 8: 417–420.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Katzka DA, Paoletti V, Leite L, Castell DO. Prolonged ambulatory pH monitoring in patients with persistent gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms: testing while on therapy identifies the need for more aggressive anti-reflux therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 2110–2113.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Schofield PM, Bennett DH, Whorwell PJ et al. Exertional gastro-oesophageal reflux: a mechanism for symptoms in patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms. Br Med J 1987; 294: 1459–1461.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Cooke RA, Anggiansah A, Smeeton NC, Owen WJ, Chambers JB. Gastroesophageal reflux in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries: an uncommon cause of exertional chest pain. Br Heart J 1994; 72: 231–236.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Paterson WG, Abdollah H, Beck IT, Da Costa LR. Ambulatory esophageal manometry, pH-metry and Holter EKG monitoring in patients with atypical chest pain. Dig Dis Sci 1993; 38: 795–802.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Katz PO, Katzka DA, Castell DO. Chest pain and the esophagus. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 740.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Schindlbeck NE, Heinrich C, Konig A et al. Optimal thresholds, sensitivity and specificity of long term pH-metry for the detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 1987; 93: 85–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Richter JE, Bradley LA, DeMeester TR, Wu WC. Normal 24-hr ambulatory pH values: influence of study center, pH electrode, age and gender. Dig Dis Sci 1992; 37: 849–856.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Schindlbeck NE, Ippisch H, Klauser AG, Muller-Lissner SA. Which pH threshold is best in esophageal pH monitoring? Am J Gastrocnterol 1991; 86: 1138–1141.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. de Caestecker JS, Heading RC. Esophageal pH monitoring: what use and what limitations? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1991; 3: 285–287.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Singh S, Richter JE, Bradley LA, Haile JM. The symptom index: differential usefulness in suspected acid-related complaints of heartburn and chest pain. Dig Dis Sci 1993; 38: 1402–1408.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Johnston BT, Collins JSA, McFarland RJ, Love AHG. Are esophageal symptoms reflux-related? A study of different scoring systems in a cohort of patients with heartburn. Am J Gastroenterol 1994; 89: 497–502.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Weusten BLAM, Roelops JMM, Akkermans LMA, Van Berge-Henegouwen GP, Smout AJPM. The symptom-association probability: an improved method for symptom analysis of 24-hour esophageal pH data. Gastroenterology 1994; 107: 1741–1745.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Galmiche JP, Scarpignato C. Esophageal sensitivity to acid in patients with non-cardiac chest pain: is the esophagus hypersensitive? Eur J Hepatol Gastroenterol 1995; 7: 1152–1159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. On WC. The physiology and philosophy of cause and effect. Gastroenterology 1994; 107: 1898–1901.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Garcia PJ, Patel PH, Hunter WC, Douglas JE, Thomas E. Esophageal contribution to chest pain in patients with coronary artery disease. Chest 1990; 98: 806–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Singh S, Richter JE, Hewson EG, Sinclair JW, Hackshaw BT. The contribution of gastroesophageal reflux to chest pain in patients with coronary artery disease. Ann Int Med 1992; 117: 824–830.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. de Caestecker JS, Bruce GM, Heading RC. Follow-up of patients with chest pain and normal coronary arteriography: the impact of esophageal investigations. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1991; 3:899–905.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Rose S, Achkar E, Easley KA. Follow up of patients with noncardiac chest pain: value of esophageal testing. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1994; 39: 2063–2068.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Ward BW, Wu WC, Richter JE, Hackshaw BT, Castell DO. Long term followup of symptomatic status of patients with non-cardiac chest pain: is diagnosis of esophageal etiology helpful? Am J Gastroenterol 1987; 82: 215–218.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Lee CA, Reynolds JC, Ouyang A, Baker L, Cohen S. Esophageal chest pain value of high-dose provocative testing with edrophonium chloride in patients with normal esophageal manometries. Dig Dis Sci 1987; 32: 682–688.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Alban Davies FIA, Lewis MJ, Rhodes J, Henderson AH. Trial of nifedipine for prevention of oesophageal spasm. Digestion 1987; 36: 81–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Achem SR, Kolts BE, MacMath T, Richter J, Mohr D, Burton L, Castell DO. Effects of omeprazole versus placebo in treatment of non-cardiac chest pain and gastroesophageal reflux. Dig Dis Sci 1997;42:2138–2145.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Cannon RO, Quyyumi AA, Schenke WH et al. Abnormal cardiac sensitivity in patients with chest pain and normal coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16: 1359–1366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Chauhan A, Mullins PA, Thuraisingham SI, Taylor G, Petch MC, Schofield PM. Abnormal cardiac pain perception in syndrome X. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24:329–335.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Frobert O, Arendt-Nielsen L, Bak P, Funch-Jensen P, Bagger JP. Pain perception and brain evoked potentials in patients with angina despite normal coronary angiograins. Heart 1996; 75: 436–441.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Trimble KC, Farouk R, Pryde A, Douglas S, Heading RC. Heightened visceral sensation in functional gastrointestinal disease is not site-specific: evidence for a generalised disorder of gut sensitivity. Dig Dis Sci 1995; 40: 1607–1613.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Junien JL, Riviere P. Review article: the hypersensitive gut - peripheral kappa agonists as a new pharmacological approach. Alim Pharmacol Therap 1995; 9: 117–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Prior A, Read NW. Reduction of rectal sensitivity and postprandial motility by granisitron, a 5HT3 receptor antagonist, in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Aliment Phannacol Therap 1993; 7: 175–180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Coffin B, Bouhassira D, Chollet R et al. Effect of the kappa agonist fedotozine on perception of gastric distension in healthy humans. Aliment Pharmacol Therap 1996; 10: 919–926.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Zerbib F, Bruley des Varannes S, Oriola RC et al. Alosetron does not affect the visceral perception of gastric distension in healthy subjects. Aliment PharTnacol Therup 1994; 8: 403–407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Clouse RE, Lustman PJ, Eckert TC, Ferney DM, Griffith LS. Low dose trazidone for symptomatic patients with esophageal contraction abnormalities: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenterology 1987; 92: 1027–1036.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Cannon RO, Quyyumi AA, Mincemoyer R et al. Imipramine in patients with chest pain despite normal coronary angiograms. New Eng J Med 1994; 330: 1411 1417.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Houghton LA, Francis CY. Use of hypnotherapy in gastrointestinal disorders. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1996; 8: 525–529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Pace F, Molteni P, Bollani S, Bianchi Porro G. Hypnotherapy in the treatment of noncardiac chest pain: report of three cases. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: A249.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Caestecker, J.S. (1999). Esophageal Chest Pain. In: Kaski, J.C. (eds) Chest Pain with Normal Coronary Angiograms: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Management. Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol 213. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5181-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5181-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7360-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5181-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics