Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science ((SECS,volume 492))

  • 108 Accesses

Abstract

In the last chapter, we have step by step introduced the various components of word meaning that we assume in our generation framework. As the focus of our work is on verbs, though, one important point still needs to be adressed: How can the various alternations of a verb be accounted for? In this chapter, we propose a set of lexical rules that derive more complex verb readings from a single base form.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. These alternations are often called diatheses. From the perspective of truth-functional semantics, one would say that they do not change the truth conditions of the sentence.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Monotonicity might be too strong a requirement for alternations in general, though. Cf. Section 7.6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Unnoticed by Levin, to leak can also be a verb of substance “intrusion”, as in The camera leaked light. This reading reverses the directionality of the PATH involved; we do not handle that reading here.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The two roles ‘inclusive’ and ‘of-matter’ (used later) are the roles used by PENMAN to realize the desired structure, but they are not very good descriptions of these semantic relationships. For a more systematic treatment, for instance along the lines of Somers [1987], the Upper Model needs to be extended.

    Google Scholar 

  5. We ignore the role of the definite determiner here, which in fact has critical influence on the ‘holistic’ interpretation of mass nouns. See, for example, White [1994].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stede, M. (1999). Verb Alternations and Extensions. In: Lexical Semantics and Knowledge Representation in Multilingual Text Generation. The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol 492. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5179-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5179-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7359-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5179-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics