Abstract
The Vineberg procedure consists of implanting the internal mammary artery (IMA) directly into an area of ischemic myocardium. The principle behind its success, as described by Dr. Vineberg, is that the implanted artery will develop communications with the’ sinusoidal’ system within the myocardium, allowing a delivery system of nutrients to ischemic areas which cannot be supplied by occluded epicardial coronary arteries. This was one of the first widely adopted surgical options for treatment of ischemie heart disease and over 15,000 IMA implants had been performed up until the 1970’s. However, skepticism of its physiological basis and the popularization of direct coronary revascularization by Favoloro, led to the abandonment of the Vineberg procedure.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shrager JB. The Vineberg Procedure: The immediate forerunner of coronary bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:1354–1364.
Vineberg AM. Development of an anastomosis between the coronary vessels and a transplanted internal mammary artery. Can Med Assoc J 1946;55:117–119.
Vineberg AM, Miller G. Internal mammary coronary anastomosis in the surgical treatment of coronary artery insufficiency. Can Med Assoc J 1951;64:204–210.
Vineberg AM. Myocardial Revascularization by Arterial/Ventricular Implants. Massachusetts, John Wright/PSG Inc, 1982.
Vineberg A, Miller D. An experimental study of the physiological role of an anastomosis between the left coronary circulation and the left internal mammary artery implanted in the left ventricular myocardium. Surg Forum 1951; 1:294–299.
Vineberg A, Miller D. Functional evaluation of an internal mammary artery coronary artery anastomosis. Am Heart J 1953;45:873–888.
Benscome SA, Vineberg A. Histological studies of the internal mammary artery after implantation into the myocardium. Am Heart J 1953;45:571–575.
Vineberg AM, Munro DD, Cohen H, Buller W. Four years’ clinical experience with internal mammary artery implantation in the treatment of human coronary insufficiency including additional experimental studies. J Thorac Surg 1955;29:1–32.
Reis RL, Enright LP, Staroscik RN, Hannah H. The effects of internal mammary artery implantation on cardiac function and survival following acute coronary occlusion. Ann Surg 1970;171:9–16.
Vineberg AM, Lwin MM. Revascularization of both cardiac ventricles by right ventricular implants. Can Med Assoc J 1972;106:763–769.
Gorlin R, Taylor WJ. Selective revascularization of the myocardium by internalmammary artery implant. N Engl J Med 1966;275:283–290.
Vineberg A, Deliyannis T, Pablo G. Myocardial nutrition after the Ivalon sponge operation. The return of a 400 million year old system. Can Med Assoc J 1959;80:949–958
Wearn JT, Mettier SR, Klumpp TG, Zschiesche LJ. The nature of the vascular communications between the coronary arteries and the chambers of the heart. Am Heart J 1933;9:143–164.
Vineberg A, Becerra A, Chari RS. The influence of the Vineberg sponge operation upon the hydrostatics of the myocardial circulation in health and disease. Evidence of luminal ventricular circulation in the beating heart. Can Med Assoc J 1961;85: 1075–1090.
Vineberg A, Pifarre R, Mercier C. An operation designed to promote the growth of new coronary arteries using a detached omental graft: a preliminary report. Can Med Assoc J 1962;86:1116–1118.
Vineberg, A, Shanks J, Pifarre R et al. Myocardial revascularization by omental graft without pedicle: experimental background and report on 25 cases followed 6 to 16 months. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1965;49:103–129.
Vineberg AM, Syed AK. The continuity of right and left ventricular myocardial sinusoidal spaces and its relation to right ventricular implants. Can Med Assoc J 1971;102:823–828.
Vineberg AM. Technical consideration for the combined operation of left internal mammary artery or right and left internal mammary artery implantation with picardiectomy and free omental graft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1967;53:837–847.
Buller WK, Vineberg A. A study of the amount of oxygen delivered to the myocardium through the implanted mammary artery. Surg Forum 1955;5:78–84.
Vineberg A, Kato Y, Pirozinsky WJ. Experimental revascularization of the entire heart. Am Heart J 1966;72:79–93.
Chiu CJ, Scott HJ. The Nature of Early Run-off in Myocardial Arterial Implants. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1973;65:768–777.
Carlson RG, Edlich RF, Lande AJ, Bonnabeau RG, Gans H, Lillehei CW. A new concept for the rationale of the Vineberg operation for myocardial revascularization. Surgery 1969;65:141–147.
Baird RJ, Goldbach MM, De La Rocha A. The current status of the internal mammary artery implant operation. Vasc Surg 1975;9:647–651.
Vineberg A, Niloff PH. The value of surgical treatment of coronary artery occlusion by implantation of the internal mammary artery into the ventricular myocardium. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1950;91:551–561.
Vineberg A. Coronary vascular anastomoses by internal mammary artery implant. Can Med Assoc J 1958;78:871–879
Vineberg A. Evidence that revascularization by ventricular-internal mammary artery implants increases longevity. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1975;70(3):381–397.
Bhayana JN, Gage AA, Takaro T. Long-term results of internal mammary artery implantation for coronary artery disease: A controlled trial. Ann Thor Surg 1980; 29:234–242.
Favaloro RG, Effler DB, Groves LK, Sones FM, Fergusson DJG. Myocardial revascularization by internal mammary artery implant procedures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1967;54:359–370.
Favaloro RG, Effler DB, Groves LK, Fergusson DJG, Lozada JS. Double internal mammary artery myocardial implantation: Clinical evaluation of results in 150 patients. Circulation 1968;37:549–555.
Sethi GK. Scott SM, Takaro T. Myocardial revascularization by internal thoracic arterial implants: Longterm follow-up. Chest 1973;64(2):235–240.
Gregori F, Toriano N, Oliveira SA, Carvalho RG, Galiano N, Macruz R, Verginelli G, Bittencourt D, Pileggi F, Zerbini EJ. Long-term results of mammary artery implants. J Cardiovasc Surg 1976;17:557–562.
Sones FM, Shirely EK. Cinecoronary arteriography. Mod Concepts Cardiovasc Dis 1962;31:735.
Vineberg A. Internal mammary artery implant in the treatment of angina pectoris-a three year follow-up. Can Med Assoc J 1954;70:367–378.
Vineberg A, Buller W. Technical factors which favour mammary coronary anastomoses with report of 45 cases of human coronary artery disease thus treated. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1955;30:411–435.
Kay EB, Demaney M, Tambe A, McLaughlin EE, Suzuki A. Internal mammary artery revascularization: Fact or fantasy. Chest 1973;64(2):227–233.
Ochsner JL, Moseley PW, Mills NL, Bower PJ. Long-term follow-up of internal mammary artery myocardial implantation. Ann Thor Surg 1977; 23(2); 118–121.
Dart CH, Scott S, Fish R, et al. Direct blood flow studies of clinical internal thoracic (mammary) arterial implants. Circulation 1970;41&42(suppl II):11–64.
Begg FR, Adatepe MH, Salvoza MI, et al. Myocardial scintigraphy: post-Vineberg study. J Thor Cardiovasc Surg. 1975;70:398.
Case RB, Nasser MG, Crampton RS. Biochemical aspects of early myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol 1969;24:766.
Fergusson DJ, Shirley EK, Sheldon WG, Effler DB, Sones FM. Left internal mammary artery implant-postoperative assessment. Suppl II Circulation 1968; 37&38:II-24-26
Sewell WH. The current status of surgery for coronary artery disease. Vasc Surg 1976;10:285.
Hayward RH, Korompai FL, Knight WL. Long-term follow-up of the Vineberg internal mammary artery implant procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 1991;51:1002–1003.
Topaz O, Pavlos S, Mackell JA, et al. The Vineberg procedure revisited: angiographic evaluation and coronary artery bypass surgery in a patient 21 years following bilateral internal mammary artery implantation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1992;25:218–222.
de Meester A, Leonard J, Chenu P, Marchandise P. Myocardial revascularization using Vineberg procedure; 23 year follow-up (French). Archives des Maladies du Coeur et des Vaisseaux 1994;87(9): 1247–1248.
Salerno T. Cardioplegic arrest in patients with previous Vineberg implants. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1979;78:769.
Nasu M, Takashi A, Hiroaki C, Shoumura T. Flow reserve capacity of left internal thoracic artery 23 years after Vineberg procedure. Ann Thor Surg 1996;61:1242–1244.
Tasdemir O, Kiziltepe U, Karagoz HY, Yamak B, Korkmaz S, Bayazit K. Longterm results of reconstructions of the left anterior descending coronary artery in diffuse atherosclerotic lesions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:745–754.
Mirhoseini M, Fisher JC, Cayton M. Myocardial revascularization by Laser: A Clinical report. Lasers in Surg Med 1983;3:241–245.
Hardy RI, Bove KE, James FW, Kaplan S, Goldman L. A histological study of laser-induced transmyocardial channels. Lasers Surg Med 1987;6:563–573.
Cooley DA, Frazier OH, Kadipasaoglu KA, Pehlivanoglu S, Shannon RL, Angelini P. Transmyocardial laser revascularization. Texas Heart Inst J 1994;21:220–224.
Kohmoto T, Fisher PE, Gu A, Zhu S-M, Yano OJ, Spotnitz HM, Smith CR, Burkhoff D. Does blood flow through Holmium:YAG transmyocardial laser channels? Ann Thor Surg 1996;61:861–868.
Tsang JC-C, Chiu RC-J. The Phantom of ‘Myocardial Sinusoids’: A Historical Reappraisal. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:1831–1835.
Fleischer KJ, Goldschmidt-Clermont PJ, Fonger JD, Hutchins GM, Hruban RH, Baumgartner WA. One-month histologic response of transmyocardial laser channels with molecular intervention. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1051–1058
Khouri RK, Brown DM, Hong S-P, Chung SH. Cytokine-induced internal mammary to coronary anastomosis. [Abstract]. Presented at the 1995 meeting of the Society of University Surgeons, Denver, CO, 1995:37.
Frazier OH, Cooley DA, Kadipasaoglu KA et al. Myocardial revascularization with laser: preliminary findings. Suppl II, Circulation 1995;92:58–65.
Cooley DA, Frazier OH, Kadipasaoglu KA, Lindenmeir MH, Pehlivanoglu S, Kolff JW, Wilansky S, Moore WH, Transmyocardial laser revascularization: clinical experience with twelve-month follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 111:4, 791–797; discussion 797-9, Apr, 1996.
Vineberg A, Zamora B. A single artery implanted into the confluence of a tricoronary arteriolar zone in the left ventricular wall may revascularize the entire heart. Dis Chest 1969;56:501–518.
Trapp WG, Burton JD, Oforsagd P. Detailed anatomy of early Vineberg anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1969;57:451.
Baird RJ, Manktelow RT, Cohoon WJ, Williams WG, Spratt EH. Improved pressure gradients and flow rates in myocardial vascular implants. Ann Surg 1968;168:736–749.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tsang, J.C., Li, C.M., Chiu, R.CJ. (1999). The Vineberg Procedure in the Era of Transmyocardial Revascularization. In: Whittaker, P., Abela, G.S. (eds) Direct Myocardial Revascularization: History, Methodology, Technology. Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol 211. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5069-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5069-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7305-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5069-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive