Skip to main content

Abstract

In 1980, the US Supreme Court in its decision, Diamond vs. Chakrabarty (1980, 206 USPQ 193), on the patentability of a genetically engineered bacterium, stated that the relevant distinction to be made was not that “between living and inanimate things, but between products of nature, whether living or not, and human-made inventions.” Today, almost two decades later, most biopharmaceutical products are natural proteins based on the cloning of human genes. As genetic engineering and in particular, transgenics occupy biotechnology, the distinction between the products of nature and human-made inventions is increasingly difficult to trace in the chain of living matter. The field of comparative genomics is discovering an abundance of shared genes among life forms. As a result, “[g]enomics is so intertwined with other technologies and products of the molecular revolution that it is hard to trace its influence in a single company or industrial structure.” (Enriquez 1998, 925).

“No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main.”

JohnDonne (1572–1631)

Devotions upon Emergent Occasions [1624], no. 17.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anonymous 1997. “China and India Move to Control Gene Export” GenEthics News, Oct/Nov, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous 1998. “The Complex Realities of Sharing Genetic Assets” Nature, Vol. 392(6676), p. 525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baslar, K. 1998. The Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind in International Law, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bio-Industries Branch 1997. “Bio-industries; Part 1: Overview and Prospects”, Industry Sector, Industry Canada, (Draft).

    Google Scholar 

  • Birmingham, K. 1988. “Roche Rewards Icelanders” Nature Medicine, Vol. 4(3), p. 261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisbee, C. 1998. “Patent Law and Litigation” Genetic Engineering News, June, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borris, R. 1996. “Natural Products Research: Perspectives from a Major Pharmaceutical Company” J. Ethnopharmacology, Vol. 51, p. 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, C. 1996. Ethnobotany,Principles and Applications, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, p. 368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe 1997. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being With Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, Oviedo, 04.IV.1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond vs. Chakrabarty 1980. USPQ 206, p. 193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enriquez, J. 1998. “Genomics and the World’s Economy” Science, Vol. 281, p. 925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enserik, M. 1998. “Physicians Wary of Scheme to Pool Icelanders’ Genetic Data” Science, Vol. 281, p. 890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission 1998. “Directive on the Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions”, Official Journal of the European Communities, Vol. L213/13.

    Google Scholar 

  • FIGO Committee for the Study of Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction 1995. “Recommendations on Ethical Issues in Obstetrics and Gynaecology Patenting Human Genes”, May 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gros Espiell, H. 1997. UNESCO’s Draft Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights, Law & Hum Gen Rev, Vol. 7, p. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Group of Advisers on the Ethical Implications of Biotechnology of the European Commission 1996. “Opinion on the Ethical Aspects of Patenting Inventions Involving Elements of Human Origins”, September 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M. & Eisenberg, R. 1998. “Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research” Science, Vol. 280, p. 701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Debate 1997. c-I20 as reported in “The Human Genome Project, Gene Therapy and Patenting”, Research Paper 97/128 at fn. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • HUGO 1995. “Statement on the Patenting of DNA Sequences” Genome Digest, Vol. 2(2), pp. 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • HUGO 1996. “Statement on the Principled Conduct of Genetic Research” Genome Digest, Vol. 3(2), pp. 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • HUGO 1998. “Statement on DNA Sampling: Control and Access” Genome Digest (In press).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU) 1993. “Statement on Gene Patenting” Int. Dig. Health Legislat., Vol. 44, p. 363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraman, K.S. 1997. “India Drafts to Protect Bioresources” Nature, Vol. 390, p. 108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelves, D. 1993. Bio/Technology, Vol. 11, p. S11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, S. et al. 1996. “Biological Diversity, Indigenous Knowledge, Drug Discovery and Intellectual Property Rights: Creating Reciprocity and Maintaining Relationships” J. of Ethnopharmacology, Vol. 51, p. 45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoppers, B.M. 1991. Human Dignity and Genetic Heritage Ottawa: Law Reform Commission of Canada, pp. 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoppers, B.M., Hirtle, M., Lormeau, S., Laberge, C.M. & Laflamme, M. 1998. “Control of DNA Samples and Information” Genomics, Vol. 50, pp. 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, J. 1998. “When Moderation Turns to Greed” Nature, Vol. 393(6685), p. 499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, E. 1997. “Need a Reagent? Just Sign Here” Science, Vol. 278, p. 212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Biotechnology Advisory Committee 1998. “Leading in the Next Millennium”, Industry Canada, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennisi, E. 1998. “Genetic Ownership: Brazil Wants Cut of its Biological Bounty” Science, Vol. 280, p. 1445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posey, D. 1996. Beyond Intellectual Property, Ottawa, International Development Research Centre, p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rause, R. 1998. “Australian Laws Frustrate Bioprospectors” Nature Medicine, Vol. 4(6), p. 651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatz, U. 1997. “Patents and Morality” Biotechnology, Patents and Morality, S. Sterckx (Ed.), Suffolk: The Ipswich Book Company, p. 167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamel, R. & Macbeth, M. 1997. “Outlook for Biotechnology Industry Remains Strong for Next Year and Beyond” Genetic Engineering News, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, M. 1998. “Bioresources and `Biopiracy’ in Brazil” Science, Vol. 280, p. 657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterckx, S. 1997. “European Patent Law and Biotechnological Inventions” Biotechnology, Patents and Morality, S. Sterckx (Ed.), Suffolk: The Ipswich Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO 1997. Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights, 11/11/97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbanski, M. 1995. “Chemical Prospecting, Biodiversity Conservation, and the Importance of International Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in Biological Materials” Buffalo.I. of Int’l Law, Vol. 2, p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadman, M. 1997. “Ethical Terms Set for Breast Cancer Test”, Nature News.

    Google Scholar 

  • Working Group on the Ethical, Social and Legal Aspects of Human Genome Analysis 1991. Report of 31 December 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization 1998. “Statement of WHO Expert Advisory Group on Ethical Issues in Medical Genetics”, Geneva: Switzerland, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knoppers, B.M. (1999). Biotechnology. In: Caulfield, T.A., Williams-Jones, B. (eds) The Commercialization of Genetic Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4713-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4713-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7135-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4713-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics