Abstract
In 1980, the US Supreme Court in its decision, Diamond vs. Chakrabarty (1980, 206 USPQ 193), on the patentability of a genetically engineered bacterium, stated that the relevant distinction to be made was not that “between living and inanimate things, but between products of nature, whether living or not, and human-made inventions.” Today, almost two decades later, most biopharmaceutical products are natural proteins based on the cloning of human genes. As genetic engineering and in particular, transgenics occupy biotechnology, the distinction between the products of nature and human-made inventions is increasingly difficult to trace in the chain of living matter. The field of comparative genomics is discovering an abundance of shared genes among life forms. As a result, “[g]enomics is so intertwined with other technologies and products of the molecular revolution that it is hard to trace its influence in a single company or industrial structure.” (Enriquez 1998, 925).
“No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main.”
JohnDonne (1572–1631)
Devotions upon Emergent Occasions [1624], no. 17.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anonymous 1997. “China and India Move to Control Gene Export” GenEthics News, Oct/Nov, p. 5.
Anonymous 1998. “The Complex Realities of Sharing Genetic Assets” Nature, Vol. 392(6676), p. 525.
Baslar, K. 1998. The Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind in International Law, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Bio-Industries Branch 1997. “Bio-industries; Part 1: Overview and Prospects”, Industry Sector, Industry Canada, (Draft).
Birmingham, K. 1988. “Roche Rewards Icelanders” Nature Medicine, Vol. 4(3), p. 261.
Bisbee, C. 1998. “Patent Law and Litigation” Genetic Engineering News, June, p. 11.
Borris, R. 1996. “Natural Products Research: Perspectives from a Major Pharmaceutical Company” J. Ethnopharmacology, Vol. 51, p. 29.
Cotton, C. 1996. Ethnobotany,Principles and Applications, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, p. 368.
Council of Europe 1997. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being With Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, Oviedo, 04.IV.1997.
Diamond vs. Chakrabarty 1980. USPQ 206, p. 193.
Enriquez, J. 1998. “Genomics and the World’s Economy” Science, Vol. 281, p. 925.
Enserik, M. 1998. “Physicians Wary of Scheme to Pool Icelanders’ Genetic Data” Science, Vol. 281, p. 890.
European Commission 1998. “Directive on the Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions”, Official Journal of the European Communities, Vol. L213/13.
FIGO Committee for the Study of Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction 1995. “Recommendations on Ethical Issues in Obstetrics and Gynaecology Patenting Human Genes”, May 30.
Gros Espiell, H. 1997. UNESCO’s Draft Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights, Law & Hum Gen Rev, Vol. 7, p. 133.
Group of Advisers on the Ethical Implications of Biotechnology of the European Commission 1996. “Opinion on the Ethical Aspects of Patenting Inventions Involving Elements of Human Origins”, September 25.
Heller, M. & Eisenberg, R. 1998. “Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research” Science, Vol. 280, p. 701.
House of Commons Debate 1997. c-I20 as reported in “The Human Genome Project, Gene Therapy and Patenting”, Research Paper 97/128 at fn. 85.
HUGO 1995. “Statement on the Patenting of DNA Sequences” Genome Digest, Vol. 2(2), pp. 6–9.
HUGO 1996. “Statement on the Principled Conduct of Genetic Research” Genome Digest, Vol. 3(2), pp. 2–3.
HUGO 1998. “Statement on DNA Sampling: Control and Access” Genome Digest (In press).
International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU) 1993. “Statement on Gene Patenting” Int. Dig. Health Legislat., Vol. 44, p. 363.
Jayaraman, K.S. 1997. “India Drafts to Protect Bioresources” Nature, Vol. 390, p. 108.
Kelves, D. 1993. Bio/Technology, Vol. 11, p. S11.
King, S. et al. 1996. “Biological Diversity, Indigenous Knowledge, Drug Discovery and Intellectual Property Rights: Creating Reciprocity and Maintaining Relationships” J. of Ethnopharmacology, Vol. 51, p. 45.
Knoppers, B.M. 1991. Human Dignity and Genetic Heritage Ottawa: Law Reform Commission of Canada, pp. 18–22.
Knoppers, B.M., Hirtle, M., Lormeau, S., Laberge, C.M. & Laflamme, M. 1998. “Control of DNA Samples and Information” Genomics, Vol. 50, pp. 385–401.
Maddox, J. 1998. “When Moderation Turns to Greed” Nature, Vol. 393(6685), p. 499.
Marshall, E. 1997. “Need a Reagent? Just Sign Here” Science, Vol. 278, p. 212.
National Biotechnology Advisory Committee 1998. “Leading in the Next Millennium”, Industry Canada, p. 4.
Pennisi, E. 1998. “Genetic Ownership: Brazil Wants Cut of its Biological Bounty” Science, Vol. 280, p. 1445.
Posey, D. 1996. Beyond Intellectual Property, Ottawa, International Development Research Centre, p. 38.
Rause, R. 1998. “Australian Laws Frustrate Bioprospectors” Nature Medicine, Vol. 4(6), p. 651.
Schatz, U. 1997. “Patents and Morality” Biotechnology, Patents and Morality, S. Sterckx (Ed.), Suffolk: The Ipswich Book Company, p. 167.
Shamel, R. & Macbeth, M. 1997. “Outlook for Biotechnology Industry Remains Strong for Next Year and Beyond” Genetic Engineering News, December.
Silva, M. 1998. “Bioresources and `Biopiracy’ in Brazil” Science, Vol. 280, p. 657.
Sterckx, S. 1997. “European Patent Law and Biotechnological Inventions” Biotechnology, Patents and Morality, S. Sterckx (Ed.), Suffolk: The Ipswich Book Company.
UNESCO 1997. Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights, 11/11/97.
Urbanski, M. 1995. “Chemical Prospecting, Biodiversity Conservation, and the Importance of International Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in Biological Materials” Buffalo.I. of Int’l Law, Vol. 2, p. 131.
Wadman, M. 1997. “Ethical Terms Set for Breast Cancer Test”, Nature News.
Working Group on the Ethical, Social and Legal Aspects of Human Genome Analysis 1991. Report of 31 December 1991.
World Health Organization 1998. “Statement of WHO Expert Advisory Group on Ethical Issues in Medical Genetics”, Geneva: Switzerland, p. 5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Knoppers, B.M. (1999). Biotechnology. In: Caulfield, T.A., Williams-Jones, B. (eds) The Commercialization of Genetic Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4713-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4713-6_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7135-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4713-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive