Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Demography and Floating Males in a Population of Cheirogaleus Medius

  • Chapter
New Directions in Lemur Studies

Abstract

According to recent field studies, the Fat-tailed Dwarf Lemur(Cheirogaleus medius)lives in permanent pairs together with the subadult offspring from the previous breeding season, within defended territories. Obligate paternal care was suggested to be responsible for the evolution of pair-living in this species. Aims of this study were to describe the population dynamics inC. mediusand to draw attention to the occurrence of floating males as possible alternative to monogamy in these nocturnal lemurs.

A mark-recapture study in the Kirindy Forest/CFPF, western Madagascar, was combined with observations and radio-tracking of 34 individuals during the rainy seasons from 1995 to 1998. The study area was saturated with territories during the whole study period. Nevertheless, demographic variables such as population density, sex ratio, and age structure varied strongly between years. In 1996 and 1998 population density was highest (280 and 360 individuals/km’) and up to 21% of the complete study population were subadults, while in 1995 and 1997 only about 4% of the captured animals were not adult and population density was relatively low. Consistent with this bi-annual fluctuation, no infants were recorded in 1998. In two of the four study periods, the sex ratio of adults was male biased. These surplus males (= floaters) were not associated with a given female and differed significantly from males with pair-bonds (= territorial males) concerning movement patterns and sleeping habits. The large home ranges of these floaters overlapped mutually as well as with the territories of territor-ial pairs. Apart from testis size, that was significantly smaller in floaters during the mating season, morphometric data were not different between male of those two categories. Floaters were between two and at least four years old and sexually mature. Disappearance rate was not different between floaters and territorial males. The results suggest that floaters represent a pool of potential breeders, that may be

prevented from pair-living by skewed sex ratios, high population densities and a subsequent lack of vacant territories. But since they have the chance to sneak copulations with females living in pairs, the possibility that floaters represent an alternative mating strategy inCheirogaleus mediuscannot be ruled out. Future genetic studies about paternity and reproductive success of floaters and pair-bonded males, combined with demographic data, will show whether or not floaters represent an evolutionary stable strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbott, D. H. 1984. Behavioral and physiological suppression of fertility in subordinate marmoset monkeys. American Journal of Primatology6:169–186.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockelman, W. Y., U. Reichard, U. Treesucon, AND J. Raemaekers. 1998. Dispersal, pair formation and social structure in gibbons(Hylobates lar).Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology42:329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camponotus, A. B., and Radio Locations Systems, A. B. 1994. Tracker: Wildlife Tracking and Analysis Software User Manual. Version 1.1. Solna and Huddinge, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, C. R. 1934. A field study of the behavior and social relations of howling monkeys. Comparative Psychology Monographs10:1–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, C. R. 1935. Behavior of Red Spider Monkeys in Panama. Journal of Mammalogy16:171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. B. 1978. Sex ratio an local resource competition in a prosimian primate. Science210:163–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., S. D. Albon, S. D. Gibson, and E. E. Guiness. 1979. The logical stag: adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer(Cervus elaphusL.). Animal Behaviour, 27: 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fietz, J. 1999. Monogamy as a rule rather than exception in nocturnal lemurs: The case of the Fat-tailed Dwarf LemurCheirogaleus medius.Ethology105:259–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, J.W., and G. E. Woolfenden. 1992. Florida Scrub Jay, pp. 201–218. In Newton, I. ed., Lifetime Reproduction in Birds. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foerg, R. 1982. Reproduction inCheirogaleus medius.Folia Primatologica, 39: 49–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ganzhorn, J.U., and J. P. Sorg, eds. 1996. Ecology and Economy of a Tropical Dry Forest in Madagascar. Primate Report46–1:1–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldizen, A. W. 1987. Tamarins and marmosets, pp. 34–43.InSmuts, B. B., D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, and T. T. Struhsaker, eds., Primate Societies. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hladik, C. M., P. Charles-Dominique, and J. J. Petter. 1980. Feeding strategies of five nocturnal prosimians in the dry forest of the west coast of Madagascar, pp. 41–73.InCharles-Dominique, P., H. M. Cooper, A. Hladik, C. M. Hladik, E. Pages, G. E Pariente, A. Petter-Rousseaux, J.-J. Petter, and A. Schilling, eds., Nocturnal Malagasy Primates: Ecology, Physiology and Behavior. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W. T., and B. B. Bush. 1988. Movement and reproductive behavior of solitary male Redtail Guenons(Cercopithecus ascanius).American Journal of Primatology14:203–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kappeler, P. M. 1997. Intrasexual selection and testis size in strepsirhine primates. Behavioral Ecology8:10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawai, M., and K. Yoshiba. 1968. Some observations on the solitary males among Japanese Monkeys. Primates9:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenward, R. E. 1991. Ranges IV, Version 1.5. Software for analyzing animal location data. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Wareham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laws, J. W., and J. Vonder Haar Laws. 1984. Social interactions among adult male langurs(Presbytis entellus)at Rajaji Wildlife Sanctuary. International Journal of Primatology5:31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Boeuf, B. J. 1974. Male-male competition and reproductive success in elephant seals. American Zoologist14:163–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, R. J. 1988. Biometrie. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthysen, E. 1989. Territorial and nonterritorial settlings in juvenile Eurasian Nuthatches(Sitta europaeaL.) in summer. Auk106:560–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitani, J. C. 1984. The behavioral regulation of monogamy in gibbons(Hylobates muelleri).Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 15: 225–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moller, A. E. 1998. A preliminary report on the social organization ofCheirogaleus medius(Cheirogaleidae; Primates) in north-west Madagascar. Folia Primatologica, 69: 160–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutschler, T., A. T. C. Feistner, and C. M. Nievergelt. 1998. Preliminary field data on group size, diet and activity in the Alaotran Gentle LemurHapalemur griseus alaotrensis.Folia Primatologica, 69: 325–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishida, T. 1966. A sociological study of solitary males monkeys. Primates7:141–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perret, M. 1977. Influence du groupement social sur l’activation sexuelle saisonniére chez le male deMicrocebus murinus(Miller, 1777). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 43: 159–179.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perret, M. 1985. Influence of social factors on seasonal variations in plasma testosterone levels ofMicrocebus murinus.Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 69: 265–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret, M. 1986. Social influences on oestrus cycle length and plasma progesterone concentrations in the female Lesser Mouse Lemur(Microcebus murinus).Journal of Reproductive Fertility77:303–311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perret, M. 1990. Influence of social factors on sex ratio at birth, maternal investment, and young survival in a prosimian primate. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 27: 447–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perret, M. 1992. Environmental and social determinants of sexual function in the male Lesser Mouse Lemur(Microcebus murinus).Folia Primatologica, 59: 1–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perret, M. 1995. Chemocommunication in the reproductive function of mouse lemurs, pp. 377–392.InAlterman, L., G. A. Doyle, and M. K. Izard, eds., Creatures of the Dark: The Nocturnal Prosimians. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret, M. 1996. Manipulation of sex ratio at birth by urinary cues in a prosimian primate. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 38: 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perret, M, and A. Schilling. 1987. Intermale sexual effect elicited by volatile urinary ether extract inMicrocebus murinus(Prosimians, Primates). Journal of Chemical Ecology13:495–507.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perier, J.-J. 1962. Ecological and behavioral studies of Madagascars lemur in the field, pp. 267–281.InBuettner-Janusch, J., ed., The Relatives of Man. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perier, J.-J. 1978. Ecological and physiological adaptations of five sympatric nocturnal lemurs to seasonal variations in food production, pp. 211–223.InChivers, D. J., and J. Herbert, eds., Recent Advances in Primatology, Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perier, J.-J, R. Albignac, and R. Rumpler. 1977. Faune de Madagascar: Mammifères Lémuriens. Vol. 44. ORSTOM/CNRS, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peiter-Rousseaux, A. 1980. Seasonal activity rhythms, reproduction, and body weight variations in five sympatric nocturnal prosimians, simulated light and climatic conditions, pp. 211–223.InCharles-Dominique, P., H. M. Cooper, A. Hladik, C. M. Hladik, E. Pages, G. E Pariente, A. Petter-Rousseaux, J.-J. Petter, and A. Schilling, eds., Nocturnal Malagasy Primates: Ecology, Physiology and Behavior. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peiter-Rousseaux, A, and C. M. Hladik. 1980. A comparative study of food intake in five nocturnal prosimians in simulated climatic conditions, pp. 211–223.InCharles-Dominique, P., H. M. Cooper, A. Hladik, C. M. Hladik, E. Pages, G. E Pariente, A. Petter-Rousseaux, J.-J. Petter, and A. Schilling, eds., Nocturnal Malagasy Primates: Ecology, Physiology and Behavior. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohner, C. 1996. The numerical response of great horned owls to the snowshoe hare cycle: consequences of non-territorial “floaters” on demography. Journal of Animal Ecology65:359–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS/STAT. 1987. Guide for personal computers. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, A., T. E. Ziegler, and C. T. Snowdon. 1988. Sociosexual development, pair bond formation, and mechanisms of fertility suppression in female Cotton-Top Tamarins(Saguinus oedipus oedipus).American Journal of Primatology14:345–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, G. B. 1963. The Mountain Gorilla: Ecology and Behavior. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, A., and M. Perret. 1987. Chemical signals and reproductive capacity in a male prosimian primate(Microcebus murinus).Chemical Senses, 12: 143–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, J., and P. M. Kappeler. 1994. Sympatric mouse lemurs(Microcebusspp.) in western Madagascar. Folia Primatologica63:162–170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. M. 1978. The “underworld” in a territorial sparrow: adaptive strategy for floaters. American Naturalist, 112: 571–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. M. 1984. Flock switching in chickadees: Why be a winter floater? American Naturalist, 123: 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. M. 1987. Responses of floaters to removal experiments on wintering chickadees. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology20:363–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. N. M., and P. Acrese. 1989. How fit are floaters? Consequences of alternative territorial behaviors in a migratory sparrow. American Naturalist, 133: 830–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin, M., and G. Hausfater. 1976. A note on the activities of a solitary male baboon. Primates17:311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thirgood, S. J. 1990. Alternative mating strategies and reproductive success in Fallow Deer. Behaviour,116: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilson, R. L. 1981. Family formation strategies of Kloss’s Gibbons. Folia Primatologica35:259–287.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woolfenden, E., and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1984. The Florida Scrub Jay: Demography of a Cooperatively Breeding Bird. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfenden, E., and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1990. Florida Scrub Jays: a synopsis after 18 years of study, pp. 211–223.InStacey, P.B., and W. D. Koenig, eds., Cooperative Breeding in Birds: Long Term Studies of Ecology and Behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, T. E., A. Savage, G. Scheffler, and C. T. Snowdon. 1987. The endocrinology of puberty and reproductive functioning in female Cotton-Top Tamarins(Saguinus oedipus)under varying social conditions. Biology of Reproduction37:618–627.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Deutsches Primatenzentrum, Abteilung Verhaltensforschung/Ökologie, Kellnerweg 4, 37077, Göttingen, Germany

    Joanna Fietz

Authors
  1. Joanna Fietz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Antananarivo University, Antananarivo, Madagascar

    Berthe Rakotosamimanana  & Hanta Rasamimanana  & 

  2. University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Jörg U. Ganzhorn

  3. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois, USA

    Steven M. Goodman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fietz, J. (1999). Demography and Floating Males in a Population of Cheirogaleus Medius . In: Rakotosamimanana, B., Rasamimanana, H., Ganzhorn, J.U., Goodman, S.M. (eds) New Directions in Lemur Studies. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4705-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4705-1_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7131-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4705-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation