Skip to main content

Integrating Domain Knowledge, Requirements, and Specifications

  • Chapter
Case Technology

Abstract

This paper describes efforts to develop a transformation-based software environment that supports the acquisition and validation of software requirements specifications. These requirements may be stated informally at first, and then gradually formalized and elaborated. Support is provided for groups of requirements analysts working together, focusing on different analysis tasks and areas of concern. The environment assists in the validation of formalized requirements by translating them into natural language and graphical diagrams and testing them against a running simulation of the system to be built. Requirements defined in terms of domain concepts are transformed into constraints on system components. The advantages of this approach are that specifications can be traced back to requirements and domain concepts, which in turn have been precisely defined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J.S. Anderson and S. Fickas, “A proposed perspective shift: Viewing specification design as a planning problem,” in Proc. 5th Int. Workshop Software Specification and Design, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 177–184, Computer Society Press of the IEEE, May 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ASA, Airman’s Information Manual. Aviation Supplies and Academics: Seattle, WA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Balzer, D. Cohen, M.S. Feather, N.M. Goldman, W. Swartout, and D.S. Wile. “Operational specification as the basis for specifiction validation,” Theory and Practice of Software Technology, pp. 21–49. North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Balzer, C. Green, and T. Cheatham. “Software technology in the 1990s using a new paradigm,” IEEE Computer, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 39–45, November 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Benner, “Using simulation techniques to analyze specifications,” in Proc. 5th KBSA Conf., Syracuse, NY, pp. 305–316, 1990. Data Analysis Center for Software.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. Benner and W.L. Johnson, “The use of scenarios for the development and validation of specifications,” in Proc. Comput. Aerospace VII Conf., Monterey, CA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Borgida, S. Greenspan, and J. Mylopoulos. “Knowledge representation as the basis for requirements specifications,” IEEE Comput., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 82–91, April 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R.M. Burstall and J. Goguen. “Putting theories together to make specifications,” in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Artificial Intell., Cambridge, MA, pp. 1045–1058, August 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Cohen. Symbolic execution of the gist specification language,“ in Proc. 8th Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intell., pp. 17–20, IJCAI, Karlsruhe, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Cohen. AP5 Manual. USC-Information Sciences Institute: Marina del Rey, CA, June 1989. Draft.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A.M. Davis. Software Requirements Analysis and Specification. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M.S. Feather,“Constructing specifications by combining parallel elaborations,” IEEE Trans. Software Eng. vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 198–208, February 1989. Available as research report #RS-88–216 from ISI, 4676 Admiralty Way, Marina del Rey, CA 90292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Fickas, “A knowledge-based approach to specification acquisition and construction,” Technical Report 86–1, Computer Science Dept., University of Oregon, Eugene, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  14. N.M. Goldman, “Three dimensions of design development,” in Proc. 3rd Nat. Conf. Artificial Intell., Washington, DC, pp. 130–133, August 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Green, D. Luckham, R. Balzer, T. Cheatham, and C. Rich. “Report on a knowledge-based software assistant,” Readings in Artificial Intelligence and Software Engineering, pp. 377–428, Morgan Kaufmann: Los Altos, CA, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Hagelstein, “Declarative approach to information system requirements,” J. Knowledge-Based Syst., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 211–220, September 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. F.G. Halasz, T.P. Moran, and R.H. Trigg, “Notecards in a nutshell.” Technical Report, Xerox PARC, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Harel, H. Lachover, A. Naamad, A. Pnueli, M. Politi, R. Sherman, and A. Shtul-Trauring, “Statemate: A working environment for the development of complex reactive systems,” in Proc. 10th Int. Conf Software Eng., Singapore, pp. 396–406, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Harris and A. Czuchry, “The knowledge-based requirements assistant,” IEEE Expert, vol. 3, no. 4, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  20. K.E. Huff and V.R. Lesser, “The GRAPPLE plan formalism,” Technical Report 87–08, University of Massachusetts, Department of Computer and Information Science, April 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  21. V. Hunt and A. Zellweger, “The FAA’s advanced automation system: Strategies for future air traffic control systems,” IEEE Comput. vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 19–32, February 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. W.L. Johnson, “Specification via scenarios and views,” in Proc. 3d Int. Software Process Workshop, Breckenridge, CO, pp. 61–63, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  23. W.L. Johnson, “Deriving specifications from requirements,” in Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Software Eng., Singapore, pp. 428–437, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. W.L. Johnson, “Specification as formalizing and transforming domain knowledge,” in Proc. AAAI Workshop on Automating Software Design, St. Paul, MN, pp. 48–55, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  25. W.L. Johnson and M.S. Feather, “Using evolution transformations to construct specifications,” Automating Software Design. AAAI Press: Cambridge, MA, 1991, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. W.L. Johnson and K. Yue, “An integrated specification development framework,” Technical Report RS-88–215, University of Southern California, Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, CA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  27. V.E. Kelly and U. Nonnenmann, Reducing the complexity of formal specification acquisition,“ in Proc. AAAI-88 Workshop on Automating Software Design, St. Paul, MN, pp. 66–72, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Mac Gregor. Loom Users Manual, USC/ISI, Marina del Rey, CA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  29. J.J. Myers and W.L. Johnson, “Towards specification explanation: Issues and lessons,” in Proc. 3d Knowledge-Based Software Assistant Conf., Rome, NY, pp. 251–269, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  30. C. Niskier, T. Maibaum, and D. Schwabe, “A look through PRISMA: Towards pluralistic knowledge-based environments for software specification acquisition, ”in Proc. 5th Int. Workshop on Software Specification and Design, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 128–136. Computer Society Press of the IEEE, May 1989.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. The KBSA Project. Knowledge-based specification assistant: Final report. Unpublished, USC/ISI, Marina del Ray, CA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  32. . Refine User’s Guide, Reasoning Systems, Palo Alto, CA, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  33. H.B. Rubenstein and R.C. Waters, “The requirements apprentice: An initial scenario,” in Proc. 5th Int. Workshop on Software Specification and Design, Pittsburgh, PA, May, pp. 211–218. Computer Society Press of the IEEE, 1989.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. C. Rich, H.E. Schrobe, and R.C. Waters, “An overview of the programmer’s apprentice, in Proc. 6th Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intell., Tokyo, pp. 827–828, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  35. W.N. Robinson, “Integrating multiple specifications using domain goals,” in Proc. 5th Int. Workshop on Software Specification and Design, Pittsburgh, PA, May, pp. 219–226. Computer Society Press of the IEEE, 1989.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. D.R. Smith, G.B. Kotik, and S.J. Westfold, “Research on knowledge-based software environments at Kestrel Institute,” IEEE Trans. Software Eng., vol. SE-11, no. 11, pp. 1278–1295, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. G.L. Steele,Jr., “The definition and implementation of a computer programming language,” Technical Report 595, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, MA 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  38. W. Swartout, “Gist English generator,” in Proc. Nat. Conf. Artificial Intell., Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 404–409, AAAI, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  39. R.C. Waters, “The programmer’s apprentice: A session with KBEmacs,” IEEE Trans. Software Eng., vol. SE-11, no. 11, pp. 1296–1320, November 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johnson, W.L., Feather, M.S., Harris, D.R. (1991). Integrating Domain Knowledge, Requirements, and Specifications. In: Yeh, R.T. (eds) Case Technology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3644-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3644-4_3

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6621-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-3644-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics