Skip to main content

A Differential Geometric Approach to Motion Planning

  • Chapter
Nonholonomic Motion Planning

Abstract

We propose a general strategy for solving the motion planning problem for real analytic, controllable systems without drift. The procedure starts by computing a control that steers the given initial point to the desired target point for an extended system, in which a number of Lie brackets of the system vector fields are added to the right-hand side. The main point then is to use formal calculations based on the product expansion relative to a P. Hall basis, to produce another control that achieves the desired result on the formal level. It then turns out that this control provides an exact solution of the original problem if the given system is nilpotent. When the system is not nilpotent, one can still produce an iterative algorithm that converges very fast to a solution. Using the theory of feedback nilpotentization, one can find classes of non-nilpotent systems for which the algorithm, in cascade with a precompensator, produces an exact solution in a finite number of steps. We also include results of simulations which illustrate the effectiveness of the procedure.

Work supported in part by the National Science Foundation under NSF Grant DMS-8902994.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A.A. Agrachev and R.V. Gamkrelidze. The exponential representation of flows and chronological calculus. Math. Sbornik, 107(149):467–532, 1978.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. J.A. Bathurin. Lectures on Lie algebras. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R.W. Brockett. Control theory and singular Riemannian geometry, pages 11–27. New Directions in Applied Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Fliess. Réalisation locale des systèmes non linéaires, algèbres de lie filtrées transitives et series generatrices non commutatives. Invent. Math., 71:521–537, 1983.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Hermes. Distributions and the lie algebras their bases can generate. In Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 106, No. 2, pages 555–565, 1989.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Hermes, A. Lundell, and D. Sullivan. Nilpotent bases for distributions and control systems. J. Diff. Eqs., 55(3):385–400, 1984.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Hauser, S. Sastry, and P. Kokotovic. Nonlinear control via approximate input-output linearization: the ball and beam example. In Proc. 28th IEEE CDC, pages 1987–1993, Tampa, Florida, Dec. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Lafferriere and H.J. Sussmann. Motion planning for controllable systems without drift: a preliminary report. SYCON report 90–04, Rutgers Center for Systems and Control, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, July 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.M. Murray and Sastry S.S. Grasping and manipulation using multifingered robot hands. Memorandum UCB/ERL M90/24, Electronics Research Laboratory, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, March 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.W. Murray and S.S. Sastry. Steering nonholonomic systems using sinusoids. In Proc. 29th IEEE CDC, pages 2097–2101, Honolulu, Hawaii, Dec. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Palais. Global formulation of the Lie theory of transformation groups, volume 22 of Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. AMS, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H.J. Sussmann and G. Lafferriere. Motion planning for controllable systems without drift. In preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Sastry and Zexiang Li. Robot motion planning with nonholonomic constraints. In Proc. 28th IEEE CDC, pages 211–216, Tampa, Florida, Dec. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H.J. Sussmann. Lie brackets and local controllability: a sufficient condition for scalar input systems. S.I.A.M. J. Control and Optimization, 21(5):686–713, 1983.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. H.J. Sussmann. A product expansion for the Chen series, pages 323–335. Theory and Applications of Nonlinear Control Systems, C. Byrnes and A. Lindquist Eds. North-Holland, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H.J. Sussmann. A general theorem on local controllability. S.I.A.M. J. Control and Optimization, 25(1):158–194, 1987.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lafferriere, G., Sussmann, H.J. (1993). A Differential Geometric Approach to Motion Planning. In: Li, Z., Canny, J.F. (eds) Nonholonomic Motion Planning. The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol 192. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3176-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3176-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6392-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-3176-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics