Abstract
For more than 60 years, United States telecommunications policy was guided by the Communications Act of 1934. Despite the incredible changes that occurred in the telecommunications sector during this long period, very few changes were made in the law. Indeed, it was the failure of the 1934 Act to provide the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) with the necessary guidance in dealing with one of these changes — competitive entry — that forced antitrust authorities to wrest control of the sector from the FCC in the 1980s.1 In 1996, partly in response to controversies created by the resulting AT&T antitrust decree, the Congress passed a new Telecommunications Act that opened all markets to entry, but evidenced a misguided belief in the efficacy of regulation to achieve this result.2 Rather than freeing the entire sector from government regulation, the 1996 Act established a new, more complicated regulatory regime that has created controversy, litigation, and only modest progress.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Crandall, Robert W. and Jerry Hausman (2000), “Competition” in U.S. Telecommunications Services Four Years After the 1996 Act,” in Sam Peltzman and Clifford Winston (eds.) Deregulation of Network Industries. The Brookings Institution.
Crandall, Robert W. and Leonard Waverman (1996), Talk is Cheap: The Promise Of Regulatory Reform in North American Telecommunications. The Brookings Institution.
Crandall, Robert W. and Leonard Waverman (2000), Who Pays for Universal Service? When Telephone Subsidies Become Transparent. The Brookings Institution.
Harris, Robert G. and Jeffrey Kraft (1997), “Meddling Through: Regulating Local Telephone Competition in the United States,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 11, Fall, pp. 93–112.
Hausman, Jerry (1999), “Regulation by TSLRIC: Economic Effects on Investment and Innovation,” Multimedia Und Recht.
Hausman, Jerry (1999) “The Effect of Sunk Costs in Telecommunication Regulation,” in J. Alleman and E. Noam, eds., Real Options: The New Investment Theory and its Implications for Telecommunications Economics, Kluwer Academic Press.
Sappington, David E.M. and David S. Sibley (1988), “Regulating without Cost Information: The Incremental Surplus Subsidy Scheme,” International Economic Review, Vol. 29, May, pp. 297–306.
Vogelsang, Ingo and Jorg Finsinger (1979), “A Regulatory Adjustment Process for Optimal Pricing by Multiproduct Monopoly Firms,” Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 10, Spring, pp. 157–71.
Winston, Clifford (1998), “U.S. Industry Adjustment to Economic Deregulation,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 12, Summer, pp. 89–110.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Crandall, R.W. (2001). Local and Long Distance Competition: Replacing Regulation with Competition. In: Eisenach, J.A., May, R.J. (eds) Communications Deregulation and FCC Reform: Finishing the Job. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1521-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1521-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5595-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1521-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive