Skip to main content

From Love Dynamics to Relationship Marketing: The Case of Linear Partners

  • Chapter
Optimal Control and Differential Games

Part of the book series: Advances in Computational Management Science ((AICM,volume 5))

Abstract

This paper opens the complex issue of relationship marketing to formal modeling using differential equations. Our purpose is to examine how relational commitment is established, developed and maintained in a context of symmetric and asymmetric partners.We present three main findings. The rates of commitment of the seller and the buyer are higher when both partners are engaged in a symmetric relational exchange. A consciously attractive buyer is reluctant to develop a long-term relationship with an unreliable seller. Neither a very low level of opportunistic inclination nor a very high level of trust is healthy for the relational commitment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morgan, R. M. and Hunt, S.D. (1994), “The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing”, Journal of Marketing, 58, 3, 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rinaldi, S. (1998), “Love Dynamics: The case of Linear couples”, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 95, 181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dwyer, F.R., Schurr, P.H. and Oh, S. (1987), “Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships”, Journal of Marketing, 51, 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jorgensen, S. and Zaccour, G. (1999), “Equilibrium Pricing and Advertising Strategies in a Marketing Channel”, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 102, 1, 11–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jorgensen, S., Sigué, S.P. and Zaccour, G. (2000), “Cooperative Advertising in a Marketing Channel”, Journal of Retailing, 76, 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jorgensen, S., Sigué, S.P. and Zaccour, G. (2001), Stackelberg Leadership in a Marketing Channel, International Game Theory Review, 3, 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sigué, S.P. (2002), “Horizontal Strategic Interactions in Franchising”, in Zaccour, G., Ed., Decision and Control in Management Science, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson, J.C. and Naru, J.A. (1990), “A model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships”, Journal of Marketing, 54, 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moore, K.R. (1998), “Trust and Relationship Commitment in Logistic Alliances: A Buyer Perspective”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 34, 24–37.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Garbarino, E. and Johnson, M.S. (1999), “The Different Roles of Satisfaction, Trust, and Commitment in Customer Relationships”, Journal of Marketing, 63, 70–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gragnani, A., Rinaldi, S. and Feichtinger, G. (1996), “Cyclic Dynamics in Romantic Relationships”, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos,7, 11, 2611–2619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Williamson, O. E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies, Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rinaldi, S. and Gragnani, A. (1998), “Love Dynamics Between Secure Individuals: A Modeling Approach”, Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 2, 4, 283–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Muratori, S. and Rinaldi, S. (1991), “Excitability, Stability, and Sign of Equilibria in Positive Linear Systems”, Systems é4 Control Letters, 16, 59–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barnes, J.G. (1994), “Close to the Customer: but is it really a relationship?”, Journal of Marketing Management, 10, 7, 561–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Palmer, A.J. (1996), “Relationship marketing: a universal paradigm or management fad?”, The Learning Organization, 3, 3, 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Das, T.K. and Teng, B. (1998), “Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances”, The Academy of Management Review, 23,3, 491–512.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Noordewier, T.G., John, G, and Nevin, J.R. (1990), “Performance outcomes of purchasing arrangements in industrial buyer-vendor relationships”, Journal of Marketing, 54, 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sigué, S.P., Elloumi, F. (2002). From Love Dynamics to Relationship Marketing: The Case of Linear Partners. In: Zaccour, G. (eds) Optimal Control and Differential Games. Advances in Computational Management Science, vol 5. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1047-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1047-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5368-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1047-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics