Skip to main content

Public R&D and Infrastructure Policies: Effects on Cost of Midwestern Agriculture

  • Chapter
Agricultural Productivity

Part of the book series: Studies in Productivity and Efficiency ((SIPE,volume 2))

Abstract

U.S. competitiveness in agricultural products and the competitiveness of individual states can be shifted by changes in public policies on R&D, extension, infrastructure, and other programs. States are heterogeneous in agro-climatic conditions and resource-base, and they have different public R&D, extension, and infrastructure policies. The objective of this paper is to assess the impacts of public investment in research and infrastructure on cost of production and input demands in five Midwestern states (Minnesota, Iowa, Illinois, Missouri, and Indiana). We represent technology via the variable cost function. Our model identifies two outputs (crops and livestock) and four variable inputs (capital, land, hired labor, and materials). Fixed factors include self-employed and unpaid family labor, own R&D, potential spillovers from other states’ investment in research, and infrastructure (i.e., roads and highways).

We estimate the variable cost function using pooled time series and cross section observations. The parameter estimates are used to construct measures of price responsiveness. The own-price elasticities of demand, evaluated at sample means, for capital, land, hired labor, and materials are −0.86, −0.70, −0.59, and −0.04, respectively. Pair-wise substitution dominates. Capital and land and capital and hired labor exhibit strong substitutability. The impacts on variable costs of increasing endowments of the fixed factors are large and negative. Finally, the implied internal rate of return to investment in agricultural research exceeds 40 percent per annum.

The authors are Professor, Department of Economics, Iowa State University; Economist, ERS-USDA; Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Oregon State University, and Economist, ERS-USDA. The received helpful comments from two reviewers of an earlier draft of the paper, and participants in the joint NC208, ERS, and Farm Foundation sponsored conference, “Agricultural Productivity: Data, Methods, and Measures,” Washington, D.C., March 1999. Financial assistance has been obtained from ERS, the Iowa Agricultural and Home Economics Experiment Station, and the Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alston, J. M., and P. G. Pardey. 1996. Making Science Pay. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, J., B. Craig, and P. Pardey. 1999. “Research Lags and Research Returns.” In Paying for Agricultural Productivity, ed. J. M. Alston, P. G. Pardey, and V. H. Smith.. Baltimore, Md.: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 333–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., A. Varga, and Z. Acs. 1997. “Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations.” Journal of Urban Economics, 42:422–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, V. E. 1988. “Modeling Supply Response in a Multiproduct Framework.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70(November):813–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, V. Eldon, F. Gollop, A. Kelly-Hawke, and G. Swinand. 1999. “Patterns of Productivity Growth in the U.S. Farm Sector: Linking State and Aggregate Models.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81:164–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barten, A. P. 1969. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of a Complete System of Demand.” European Economic Review, l (Fall):7–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. E., and T. J. McGuire. 1997. “Macroeconomic Analysis of the Linkages Between Transportation Investments and Economic Performance,” NCHRP Report 389, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, E. R., and N. E. Savin. 1976. “Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Singular Equation Systems with Autoregressive Disturbances.” Econometrica, 43:937–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J. I., and X. Yan. 1997. “International R&D Spillovers between Canadian and Japanese Industries.” Canadian Journal of Economics, 30:276–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binswangen H. 1974. “The Measurement of Technical Change Biases with Many Factors of Production.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(December): 964–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on the Future of the Colleges of Agriculture in the Land Grant College System, Board on Agriculture. 1995. Colleges of Agriculture at Land Grant Universities: A Profile. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K. W. 1995. Technical Change, Human Capital, and Spillovers in United States Agriculture, 1949-1985. New York: Garland Pub. Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W. E. 1973. “Functional Forms for Profit and Transformation Functions.” Journal of Economic Theory, 6:284–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evenson, Robert E. 2001, forthcoming. “Economic Impact Studies of Agricultural Research and Extension.” Chapter for Handbook of Agricultural Economics, volume 1, ed. B. L. Gardner and G. Rausser. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science/North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuglie, K., N. Ballenger, K. Day, C. Klotz, M. Olinger, J. Reilly, U. Vasavada, and J. Yee. 1996. Agricultural Research and Development. Public and Private Investments Under Alternative Markets and Institutions. Agricultural Economic Research #735, Economic Research Service, USDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. 2000. Econometic Analysis. 4th edition. Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Prentice Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. 1998. R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. 1979. “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth.” Bell Journal of Economics, 10(Spring):92–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. 1995. “R&D and Productivity.” In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, ed. P. Stoneman. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, W. E., and R. E. Evenson. 1989. “Supply and Demand Functions for Multiproduct U.S. Cash Grain Farms: Biases Caused by Research and Other Policies.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71(August):761–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, W. E., and R. E. Evenson. 2000. The Development of U.S. Agricultural Research and Education: An Economic Perspective. Ames: Iowa State University, Department of Economics (available at the USDA, National Agricultural Library).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, W. E., and R. E. Evenson. 1994. The Development of U.S. Agricultural Research and Education: An Economic Perspective. Ames: Iowa State University, Department of Economics (available at the USDA, National Agricultural Library).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, W. E., and R. Evenson. 1993. Science for Agriculture. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, W. E., A. McCunn, and J. Xu. 2001, forthcoming. “Public Agricultural Research Expenditures with an Agricultural Productivity Emphasis: Data for 48 States, 1927–1995.” Iowa State University, Department of Economics, Staff Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, J., W. E. Huffman, and T. Sandler. 1994. “Agricultural Research Expenditure in the United States: A Public Goods Perspective.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 66(May):267–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, L. J. 1974. “Economics of Monotonicity, Convexity, and Quasi-Convexity.” Technical Report No. 123, The Economic Series, Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, L. J. 1978. “Testing and Imposing Monotonicity, Convexity, and Quasi-Convexity Constraints.” In Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, ed. D. McFadden and M. Fuss. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, H., and C. R. Shumway. 1997. “Technical Change and Model Specification: U.S. Agricultural Production.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(May):543–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madansky, A. 1966. “On the Efficiency of Three-Stage Least Squares Estimation.” Econometrica, 34:851–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCunn, A., and W. E. Huffman. 2000. “Convergence in U.S. TFP Growth for Agriculture: Implications of Interstate Research Spillovers for Funding Agricultural Research.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82(May):370–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, C. J., and A. E. Schwartz. 1996. “State Infrastructure and Productivity Performance.” American Economics Review, 85(December): 1095–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, R., and R. E. Just. 1996. “Empirical Implementation of ex ante Cost Functions.” Journal of Econometrics, 72:231–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, T. J. 1974. Efficient Estimation with a priori Information. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shumway, C. R., and W. P. Alexander. 1988. “Agricultural Product Supplies and Input Demands: Regional Comparisons.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80 (February): 153–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. 1998. Agricultural Exports: Estimated Value by Commodity Group and State (available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FATUS/V

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Huffman, W.E., Ball, V.E., Gopinath, M., Somwaru, A. (2002). Public R&D and Infrastructure Policies: Effects on Cost of Midwestern Agriculture. In: Ball, V.E., Norton, G.W. (eds) Agricultural Productivity. Studies in Productivity and Efficiency, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0851-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0851-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5270-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0851-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics