Skip to main content

Presumptive Planning

From Urban Design to Community Creation in One Move?

  • Chapter
Psychological Sense of Community

Part of the book series: The Plenum Series in Social/Clinical Psychology ((SSSC))

Abstract

In this chapter, I explore the issue of whether planners can “create community,” as one of the current catchphrases in Western Australia (WA) suggests. In doing so, I subject to reasoned critique several of the main themes evident in Western Australian: community-development processes; their physical, neighborhood-based location, a presumption that social relations follow urban form, their inclusivity or aspect of ‘togetherness,’ and the diversity of their inhabitants. As Talen (2000, p. 172) pointedly writes: “the problem, for planners, is that the notion of community is easily misinterpreted and misapplied, and planners have not exhibited any particular sign that their use of the term is well thought out.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Al-Hindi, K. F., & Staddon, C. (1997). The hidden histories and geographies of neotraditional town planning: The case of Seaside, Florida. Environment & Planning D, Society and Space, 15, 349–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altman I. (1975). The environment & social behaviour: Privacy, personal space, territory, and crowding. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audirac, I., Shermyen, A., & Smith, M. (1990). Ideal urban form and visions of the good life. Journal of the American Planning Association, 56, 470–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audirac, I. (1992). Is the development debate of the 1990s to resonate as a fanfare for community? Journal of the American Planning Association, 58, 514–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audirac, I., & Shermyen, A. (1994). An evaluation of neotraditional design’s social prescription: Postmodern placebo or remedy for suburban malaise? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 13, 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, A., & Valins, S. (1979). Architectural mediation of residential density and control: Crowding and the regulation of social contact. In Berkowitz L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 12, (pp. 131–175). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman Z. 1995 Life in fragments., Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1998). The poor — and the rest of us. Arena Journal, no. 12, 43–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2000). What it means ‘to be excluded’: Living to stay apart — or together? In Askonas, P., and Stewart, A. (Eds), Social inclusion, (pp. 73–88). Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2001). Community. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, I., Alcock A., Murrain P., McGlynn S., & Smith G. 1985 Responsive environments. Oxford, UK: Butterworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, S. (1998). George Eliot: Community ends. Australasian Victorian Studies Journal, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, J. (2000). Green around the gills: Environmental justice and the inner city. Baltimore, MD: Institute for Policy Studies, Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calthorpe, P. (1993). The next American metropolis. New York: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calthorpe, P., & Fulton, W. (2001). The regional city: Planning for the end of sprawl. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavis, D., & Wandersman, A. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavis, D., & Newbrough, J. (1986). The meaning of ‘community’ in community psychology. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 335–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congress for the New Urbanism. (1998) Charter of the New Urbanism. Website [http://www.cnu.org].

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, E. (1995). A truly civil society. Sydney, Australia: ABC Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1992). City of quartz. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1998). Ecology of fear. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, S. (1999). Creation of community through urban design. Unpublished Planning Report, Department of Urban & Regional Planning, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J., & Hastings, A. (2000). Challenging images: Housing estates, stigma and regeneration. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle, R., & MacDonald, D. (1978). Communication and a sense of community in a metropolitan neighborhood: A factor analytic examination. Communication Quarterly, 26, 2–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duany, A., & Plater-Zyberk, E. (1992). The second coming of the American small town. Wilson Quarterly, 16, 19–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duany, A., & Plater-Zyberk, E. (1994). The neighborhood, the district and the corridor. In Katz, P. (Ed.), The New Urbanism: toward an architecture of community (pp. xvii–xx). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • East Perth Redevelopment Authority. (1992). East Perth. Perth, Western Australia: EPRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • East Perth Redevelopment Authority. (1999). The Easterly, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbesen, E., Kjos, F., & Sullivan, W. (1976) Spatial ecology: Its effects on the choice of friends and enemies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 505–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenbrook Joint Venture. (1994). Ellenbrook Community Bulletin, Autumn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenbrook Management Propriety Ltd. (2001). Morgan Fields Covenants and Building Conditions. Perth, Western Australia: EMPL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenbrook Management Propriety Ltd. (2001). Ellenbrook Community, Autumn. Perth, Western Australia: EMPL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, B. (1994). Planning sustainability and the chimera of community. Town & Country Planning, 63(4), 108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R. (1990). Settlement-identity: Psychological bonds with home places in a mobile society. Environment & Behaviour, 2, 183–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R. (1996). Constancy and change in attachments to types of settlements. Environment & Behaviour, 28, 419–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., Schacter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressure informal group. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, R. (1982). Urban Utopias in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frug, G. (1997). New urbanism or new suburbanism? Harvard Design Magazine, Winter/Spring, 56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, A., McArthur, A., & McGregor, A. (1996). Less than equal? Community organisations and estate regeneration partnerships. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, I. (1995). The strange case of Dr Jekyll in Hyde Park. Fear, media and the conduct of an emancipatory geography. Australian Geographical Studies, 33, 251–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2000). Connected cities. Town & Country Planning, February: 55–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, J., & McManus, P. (1994). Pull up the drawbridge: Fortress mentality in the suburbs. In Gibson, K., & Watson, S. (Eds), Metropolis now (pp. 91–101). Sydney, Australia: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, J., & van Looij, T. (1997) Who speaks for the poor? International Planning Studies, 2(1), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, J., Tonts M., Jones R., Fisher C., & Hugman, R. (2001) Strengthening communities: The contribution of housing policy and planning. Work in Progress Paper, AHURI, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugman, R., & Sotiri, M. (2000). Housing, social capital & stronger communities AHURI Positioning Paper, Curtin University, Perth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, P. (ed). (1994). The New Urbanism: Toward an architecture of community. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunstler, J. (1996). Home from nowhere. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, F., Sullivan, W., Coley, R., & Brunson, L. (1998). Fertile ground for community: Inner-city neighbourhood common spaces. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 823–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. (1999). Suburban backlash. Melbourne, Australia: Bloomings Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieven, A. (1999). Tale of two cities. American Prospect, August/September, 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1981). A theory of good city form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, D. (1999) Sense of place in a modern town centre: Community perceptions in Karratha. Report for Postgraduate Diploma in Urban & Regional Planning, Department of Urban & Regional Planning, Curtin University, Perth, (unpubd)

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCannell, D. (1992). Empty meeting grounds. London, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, D., & Chavis, D. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, D. (1996). Sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 315–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meppem, T. (1999). Strategic policy development for public sector organisations: A communicative framework for sustainable regional development planning Unpublished PhD thesis, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S. (1987). Crowding, conflict, and neighborhood regulation. In Altman, I., and Wandersman, A. (Eds), Neighborhood and community environments, (pp. 35–68). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1994). Acts of enclosure: Crime and defensible space in contemporary cities. In Gibson, K., and Watson, S. (Eds), Metropolis now, (pp. 78–90). Sydney, Australia: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, E. (1996). Community in theory and practice: A framework for intellectual renewal. Journal of Planning Literature, 11, 127–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, G. (1992). The rebirth of community planning. In Thornley, A. (Ed.), The crisis of London. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, L., & Strommen, S. (2001). New living report: An assessment of impacts on tenants and the community in the urban renewal of Lockridge and Langford, Western Australia. Unpublished report, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1966). The principal structures of community. In Warren, R. (ed.), Perspectives on the American community. New York: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proshansky, H., Fabian, A., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, D. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, D. (1994). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, D. (1996). The strange disappearance of civic America. American Prospect, Winter, 34–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, D. (2000) Bowling Alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, H., & Solomon, P. (1998). The property development process: Western Australia. Perth, Western Australia: Victor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivlin, L. (1987). The neighborhood, personal identity, and group affiliations. In Altman, I., and Wandersman, A. (Eds.), Neighborhood and community environment, (pp. 1–34). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C., & Jang, S. J. (2000). Neighborhood disorder, fear and mistrust: The buffering role of social ties with neighbours. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 401–420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scully, V. (1994). The architecture of community. In Katz, P. (Ed.), The New Urbanism: Toward an architecture of community, (pp. 221–230). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suttles, G. (1972). The social construction of communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talen, E. (2000). The problem with community in planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 15, 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (1995). Unleashing the potential: Bringing residents to the centre of estate regeneration. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorns, D. (1976). The quest for community. London, UK: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tönnies, F. (1955). Community & society. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban Land Institute. (1968). The community builders handbook. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western Australian Planning Commission. (1995). State planning strategy, discussion paper, The community. Perth, Western Australia: WAPC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western Australian Planning Commission. (1997a). Liveable neighbourhoods: Community design code, summary booklet. Perth, Western Australia: WAPC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western Australian Planning Commission. (1997b). Liveable neighbourhoods: Community design code. Perth, Western Australia: WAPC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western Australian Planning Commission. (2000). Liveable neighbourhoods, (2 nd Edition). Perth, Western Australia: WAPC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesenfeld, E. (1996). The concept of ‘we’: A community social psychology myth? Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 337–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windass, G. (2000). Planning for community: Can we create community? Unpublished Honours thesis, Department of Urban & Regional Planning, Curtin University, Perth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, I. (Ed). (2000). Social Capital. Melbourne, Australia: Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1999). Residential segregation and differentiated citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 3, 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hillier, J. (2002). Presumptive Planning. In: Fisher, A.T., Sonn, C.C., Bishop, B.J. (eds) Psychological Sense of Community. The Plenum Series in Social/Clinical Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0719-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0719-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5209-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0719-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics