Abstract
Brian O’Connell, founding president of INDEPENDENT SECTOR, in his incredibly widely cited claim, termed advocacy “the quintessential function of the voluntary sector” (O’Neill, 1989, p. 114). The subtext of that claim undoubtedly accounts for its broad resonance among functionaries in the nonprofit sector: nonprofit organizations (translated into the latest resonant language, “civil society institutions”) can be expected to leap into the breach to represent the interests of the poor and physically disadvantaged who are unable to represent themselves in the rough-and-tumble of U.S. interest group politics. That sense of advocacy is the focus of our interest and motivation for the analysis that follows, even though we are convinced that advocacy cannot be understood by studying it in isolation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey, C. W. (1996). Snakes in the grass. Washington Monthly, 28 (September), 24–27.
Baumgartner, F. R., & Walker, J. L. (1988). Survey research and membership in voluntary associations. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 908–928.
Baumgartner, ER. & Leech, B. L. (1998). The importance of groups in politics and political science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bykerk, L. & Maney, A. (1995). Consumer groups and coalition politics on capitol hill. In A. j. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics (4th ed., pp. 259–279). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1982). The asymmetric society. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
DeGregorio, C, & Rossotti, J. E. (1995). Campaigning for the court interest group participation. In A.J. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics (4th ed., pp. 215–238). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Faucheux, R. (1995). The grassroots explosion. Campaigns and elections, (December/January), 20–25, 53–56, 66–67.
Foley, M., & Edwards, R. (1996). The paradox of civil society. Journal of Democracy, 7, 38–52.
Gamson, W (1990). The strategy of social protest. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Gandhi, N. M. (1995). Personal correspondence to Honorable Ernest Istook. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accounting Office.
Gould, S.J. (1990). Taxonomy as politics. Dissent, 28 (Winter), 73–78.
Gove, Philip Babcock (Ed.). (1986). Webster’s Third new International Dictionary. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
Gronbjerg, K. A. (1992). Developing a universe of nonprofit organizations: Methodological considerations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 18, 63–80.
Gronbjerg, K. A. (1993). Understanding nonprofit funding: Managing revenues in social services and community development organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hertzke, A. (1988). Representing God in Washington: The role of religious lobbies in the American polity. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.
Hopkins, B. R. (1992). Charity, advocacy, and the law. New York: Wiley.
Hrebenar, R.J. (1997). Interest group politics in America. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Jenkins, J. C. (1987). Nonprofit organizations and policy advocacy. In Walter Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector (pp. 296–318). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kallenberg, A. L., Knoke, D., Marsden, P. V, & Spaeth, J. L. (1994). The national organizations study. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 860–871.
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Knoke, D. (1990). Organizing for collective action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Kohut, A. (1996). The diminishing divide: American churches, American politics. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for the People and the Press.
Laumann, E. O., & Knoke, D. (1987). The organizational state: Social choice in national policy domains. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
McCarthy, J. D., & Castelli, J. (1994). Working for justice: The campaign for human development and poor empowerment groups. Washington, DC: Life Cycle Institute, The Catholic University of America.
McCarthy, J. D., Smith, J. & Zald, M. N. (1996). Accessing public, media, electoral and governmental agendas. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy and M. N. Zald, (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunity, mobilizing structures and cultural framings (pp. 291–311). New York: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212–1241.
McPherson, J. M. (1982). Hypernetwork sampling: Duality and differentiation among voluntary associations. Social Networks 3, 25–250.
O’Neill, M. (1989). The third America: The emergence of the nonprofit sector in the United States. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Petracca, M. P. (1992). The politics of interest: Interest groups transformed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Putnam R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Putnam R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 6, 65–78.
Rampton, S., & Stauber, J. C. (1995). Yes, in your backyard: Flacking at the grass-roots level. PR Watch, 2, 5–11.
Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1992a). In search of the non-profit sector 1: The question of definitions. Voluntas, 3, 125–151.
Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1992b). In search of the non-profit sector II: The problem of classification. Voluntas, 3, 267–309.
Scott, W. R. (1997). Organizations: Rational, natural and open systems (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Schlozman, K. L., & Tierney, J. T. (1986). Organized interests and American democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Smith, D. H. (1994). The rest of the nonprofit sector I: The nature of grassroots associations in America. Prepared for Annual ARNOVA Meeting, Berkeley, CA.
Spaeth, J. L., & O’Rourke, D. P. (1994). Designing and implementing the national organizations study. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 872–890.
U.S. Postal Rate Commission (1987). Study of political advocacy in third-class nonprofit mail. Washington, DC: Postal Rate Commission.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L, & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
Walker, J. L., Jr. (1991). Mobilizing interest groups in America: Patrons, professions and social movements. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Walters, J. (1983). Multiply your clout with a grassroots lobbying network. Association Management, 35(April), 56–61.
Young, D. R., Ian, N. B., & Bailey, D. (1994). The structure of national nonprofit associations: survey results. Working Paper. Aspen Institute: Washington, DC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McCarthy, J.D., Castelli, J. (2002). The Necessity for Studying Organizational Advocacy Comparatively. In: Flynn, P., Hodgkinson, V.A. (eds) Measuring the Impact of the Nonprofit Sector. Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0533-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0533-4_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46548-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0533-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive