Abstract
I have a dirty little secret to tell. On the night of February 4, 1997, when President Bill Clinton was to give his State of the Union address and the judge in the O.J. Simpson civil case was to read the jury’s verdict, I surfed the channels to find a station that was covering the latter story rather than the speech.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aitkin, D. (1985). The new electorate. In D. Woodward, A. Parkin, & J. Summers (Eds.), Government, politics and power in Australia.. Melbourne, Australia: Longham Cheshire.
Arendt, H. W. (1978). The rise and fall of economic growth. London: Longman.
Barber, B. (1996, September). Strengthening democracy by recreating civil society. Paper presented at the meeting of Independent Sector, “Measuring the impact of the independent, not-for-profit sector on society.” Washington, DC.
Blais, A., & S. Dion, S. (Eds.). (1991). The budget-maximizing bureaucrat: Appraisals and evidence. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Burnham, W. D. (1996). Realignment lives: The 1994 earthquake and its implications. In C. Campbell & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), The Clinton presidency: First appraisals. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Butler, D., & Kavanagh, D. (1992). The British general election of 1992. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Campbell, C. (1993). Political executives and their officials. In A. W. Finifter (Ed.), The state of the discipline II. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
Campbell, C., & Naulls, D. (1991). The limits of the budget-maximizing theory: Some evidence from officials’ views of their roles and careers. In A. Biais & S. Dion, (Eds.), The budget-maximizing bureaucrat: Appraisals and evidence. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Castles, F. G., & Mitchell, D. (1992). Identifying welfare state regimes: The links between politics, instruments and outcomes. Governance, 5(1), 1–26.
Dobbin, M. (1993). The politics of Kim Campbell: From school trustee to prime minister. Toronto: Lorimer.
Donahue, J. D. (1989). The privatization decision: Public ends, private means. New York: Basic Books.
Durant, R. F. (1992). The administrative presidency revisited: Public lands, the BLM, and the Reagan revolution. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Esping-Anderson, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
Feigenbaum, H. B. (1985). The politics of public enterprise: Oil and the French state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Green, D. P., & Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies and rational choice theory: A critique of applications in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Heclo, H. (1981). Introduction: The presidential illusion. In H. Heclo, & L. M. Salamon (Eds.), The illusion of presidential government. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Henig, J. R. (1994). Rethinking school choice: Limits of the market metaphor. Princeton, NJ: University of Princeton Press.
Hennessy, P. (1992). Never again: Britain 1945–1951. London: Jonathan Cape.
Jones, C. O. (1996). Campaigning to govern: The Clinton style. In C. Campbell & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), The Clinton presidency: First appraisals. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Jones, G. W. (1983). Prime ministers’ departments really create problems: A rejoinder to Patrick Weiler. Public Administration, 61(1) 79–84.
Jones, G. W (1991). Presidentialization in a parliamentary system? In C. Campbell & M. J. Wyszomirski (Eds.), Executive leadership in Anglo-American systems. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Keegan, W (1992). The spectre of capitalism: The future of the world economy after the fall of Communism. London: Radius.
Kernell, S. (1986). Going public: New strategies of presidential leadership. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
King, A., (Ed.). (1975). Why is Britain becoming harder to govern? London: BBC Books.
King, R. (1986). The state in modern society: New directions in political sociology. London: Macmillan.
Lowi, T. J. (1969). The end of liberalism: Ideology, policy and the crisis of public authority. New York: Norton.
Marmor, T. R., Mashaw, J. L., & Harvey, P. (1990). America’s misunderstood welfare state: Persistent myths, enduring realities. New York: Basic Books.
McRoberts, K., & Posgate, D. (1980). Quebec: Social change and political crisis (2nd ed.). Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.
Newton, K. (1993). Caring and competence: The long, long campaign. In A. King (Ed.), Britain at the polls 1992. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Niskanen, W. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. New York: Aldine and Atherton.
Phillips, K. (1990). The politics of rich and poor: Wealth and the American electorate in the Reagan aftermath. New York: Random House.
Pierson, C. (1991). Beyond the welfare state?: The new political economy of welfare. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Quirk, P. J., & Hinchliffe, J. (1996). Domestic policy: The trials of a centrist democrat. In C. Campbell & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), The Clinton presidency: First appraisals. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Richards, R. (1994). Closing the door to destitution: The shaping of the Social Security Acts of the United States and New Zealand. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Rockman, B. A. (1984). The leadership question. New York: Praeger.
Rose, R. (1991). The postmodern president: George Bush meets the world (2nd ed.). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Rose, R., & Peters, G. (1978). Can government go bankrupt? New York: Basic Books.
Self, P. (1993). Government by the market?: The politics of public choice. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Seymour-Ure, C. (1991). The role of press secretaries on chief executive staffs in Anglo-American systems. In C. Campbell & M. Wyszomirski (Eds.), Executive leadership in Anglo-American systems. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Thompson, E. (1994). Fair enough: Egalitarianism in Australia. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
Weller, P. (1983). Do prime minister’s departments really create problems? Public Administration, 61(1), 59–78.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Campbell, C. (2002). The Vicious Circle of the Constricting State as Viewed through the Failure of Executive Leadership in Anglo-American Democracies. In: Flynn, P., Hodgkinson, V.A. (eds) Measuring the Impact of the Nonprofit Sector. Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0533-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0533-4_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46548-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0533-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive