Abstract
The specimen can be thought of as an electrical junction into which flows the beam current i B. The phenomena of backscattering of the beam electrons and secondary electron emission represent currents flowing out of the junction, i BSE and i SE, respectively. For a copper target with an incident beam energy of 20 keV, η is approximately 0.3 and δ is approximately 0.1, which accounts for 0.4, or 40%, of the beam current. The remaining beam current must flow from the specimen to ground to avoid the accumulation of charge in the junction (Thevenin’s current theorem). The balance of the currents is then given by
where i SC is the specimen (or absorbed) current. For the example of copper, i SC = 0.6i B. Thus, even with a conducting specimen such as a metal, an electrical connection must be established to conduct this substantial current from the specimen to ground (typically the specimen stage is wellgrounded). Because all materials (except superconductors) have the property of electrical resistivity ρ, the specimen has a resistance R ( R = ρ l / A, where l is the length of the specimen and A is the cross section). The passage of the specimen current i SC through this resistance will cause a potential drop across the specimen, V = i SC R. For a metal, ρ is typically of the order of 10-6 ohm-cm, so that a specimen 1 cm thick with a crosssectional area of 1 cm2 will have a resistance of 10-6 ohm, and a beam current of 1 nA (10-9 A) will cause a negligible potential of about 10-15 V to develop across the specimen.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Akahori, H., M. Handa, H. Yoshida, and Y. Kozuka (2000).J. Electron Microsc. 49, 735.
Chen, Y., V. E. Centonze, A. Verkhovsky, and G. G. Borisy (1995).J. Microsc. 179, 67.
Echlin, P. (1992).Low Temperature Microscopy and Analysis, Plenum Press, New York.
Hermann, R., J. Pawley, T. Nagatani, and M. Muller (1988).Scanning Microsc. 2, 1215.
Maisell, L. I. and R. Glang, eds. (1970).Handbook of Thin Film Technology, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Osawa, T. , and Y. Nozaka (1998).J. Electron Microsc. 47, 273.
Osawa, T. , Y. Yoshida, F. Tsuzuku, M. Nozaka, M. Takashio, and Y. Nozaka (1999).J. Electron Microsc. 48, 665.
Peters, K. R. (1984). InElectron Beam Interactions with Solids for Microscopy, Microanalysis, and Microlithography(D. F. Kyser, H. Niedrig, D. E. Newbury, and R. Shimizu, eds.), SEM, Inc., O’Hare, Illinois, p. 363.
Stokroos, L., D. Kalicharan, J. J. L. Van der Want, and W. L. Jongebloed (1998).J. Microsc. 189, 79.
Tanaka, A. (1994).J. Electron Microsc. 43, 177.
Walther, P., and M. Muller (1999).J. Microsc. 196, 279.
Wepf, R., M. Amrein, U. Burkli, and H. Gross (1991).J. Microsc. 163, 51.
Woodward, J. T., and J. A. Zasadinski (1996).J. Microsc. 184, 157.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goldstein, J.I. et al. (2003). Procedures for Elimination of Charging in Nonconducting Specimens. In: Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0215-9_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0215-9_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4969-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0215-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive