Skip to main content

Abstract

Genetically modified (GM) plants are the center of an increasingly rancorous debate about the value of agricultural biotechnology. The champions of agricultural biotechnology see it as a tool to help solve problems related to hunger and excessive pesticide use (BIO 2001). The critics of biotechnology, such as Altieri and Rosset (2000), say that plant biotechnology is not needed, will impoverish small farmers, will fatten the profits of life science companies, will increase pesticide use, reduce biodiversity and create “superpests.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alston, J.M., Norton, G.W., & Pardey, P.G. (1995). Science under scarcity: Principles and practices of agricultural research evaluation and priority setting. Ithaca, NY: Cornell U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M.A., & Rosset, P. (2000). Ten reasons why biotechnology will not ensure food security, protect the environment and reduce poverty in the developing world. AgBioForum, 2(3&4), 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, R. (1999). People’s Republic of China: Cotton production and market reform update 1999 (Report # CH9058). US Embassy, Beijing GAIN. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.fas.usda.gov/gainfiles/199911/25546147.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, William. (1999, November). Bollgard in Hebei. Unpublished powerpoint presentation. Xiangshan, Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falck-Zepeda, J.G., Traxler, G., Nelson, R.G., McBride, W.D., & Brooks, N. (1999, June). Rent creation and distribution from biotechnology innovations: The Case of Bt cotton and herbicide-tolerant soybeans. Paper presented at the NE-165 Conference, Transitions in Agbiotech: Economics of Strategy and Policy, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Cornejo, J., & Klotz-Ingram, C. (1998, June). Economic, environmental, and policy impacts of using genetically engineered crops for pest management. Selected paper presented at the 1998 NEREA meetings, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Klotz-Ingram, C., & Jans. (1999). Farm-level effects of adopting herbicide-tolerant soybeans in the USA. Unpublished paper. Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianessi, L.P., & Carpenter, J.E. (1999). Agricultural biotechnology: Insect control benefits. Washington, DC: National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianessi, L.P., & Carpenter, J.E. (2000). Agricultural biotechnology: Benefits of transgenic soybeans. Washington, DC: National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.ncfap.org/soy85.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J., Martin, M.M., Preckel, P.V., & Edwards, C.R. (1999). The economics of Bt corn: Valuing protection from the European corn borer. Review of Agricultural Economics, 21, 442–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia Shirong. (1999, November 4). Personal communication. Beijing, CAAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marra, M., Carlson, G., & Hubbell, B. (1998). Economic impacts of the first crop biotechnologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOA (Ministry of Agriculture) China. (1999). Unpublished data on area covered by cotton varieties.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moschini, G., Lapan, H., & Sobolevsky, A. (1999). Roundup Ready soybeans and welfare effects in the soybean complex (Department of Economics Staff Paper #324). Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moschini, G., & Lapan, H. (1997). Intellectual property rights and the welfare effects of agricultural R&D. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79, 1229–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics. (1999). China statistical yearbook 1999. Beijing: China Statistics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qaim, M. (1999). Potential benefits of agricultural biotechnology: An Example from the Mexican potato sector. Review of Agricultural Economics, 21, 390–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Xinji County Board of Agriculture. (1997). Report on transgenic cotton varieties (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pray, C., Huang, J. (2003). The Impact of Bt Cotton in China. In: Kalaitzandonakes, N. (eds) The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0177-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0177-0_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4954-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0177-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics