Skip to main content

Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agrobiotechnology: An Introduction

  • Chapter
The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech

Abstract

Radical scientific discoveries and technical breakthroughs can profoundly affect economic growth and social welfare (Romer, 1990). When radical discoveries link together and reinforce each other, they create a platform for continuing innovation with the potential to affect multiple sectors of the economy or give rise to new ones, causing far-reaching structural, social, and economic changes (Freeman & Perez, 1988).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abelson, P. (1998). A third technological revolution. Science, 279, 2019.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Abernathy, W., & Utterback, J. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 80, 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, J., Norton, G., & Pardey, P. (1995). Science under scarcity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Airman, A. (Ed.). (1998). Agricultural biotechnology. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, D., & Carlson, G. (1993). A hedonic analysis of herbicides: Do user safety and water quality matter? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 3(75), 612–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, J., Brown, S.L., Hails, R.S., Kohn, D.D., & Rees, M. (2001). Biotechnology: Transgenic crops in natural habitats.Nature,409, 682–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, G., Marra, M., & Hubbell, B. (1997, 3rd quarter). Transgenic technology for crop protection: The new “super seeds.” Choices, 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falck-Zepeda, J., Traxler, G., & Nelson, R. (2000). Surplus distribution from the introduction of a biotechnology innovation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82, 360–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C., & Perez, C. (1988). Structural crises of adjustment: Business cycles and investment behavior. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, M., & Keyowski, L. (1999). The producer benefits of herbicide-resistant canola. AgBioForum, 2(2), 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, R. (1999). The Business of agriceuticals. Nature Biotechnology, 17 (suppl.), 5–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzandonakes, N., & Bjornson, B. (1997). Vertical and horizontal coordination in the agro-biotechnology industry: Evidence and implications. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 29, 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzandonakes, N. (1999). A farm-level perspective on agrobiotechnology: How much value and for whom? AgBioForum, 2(2), 61–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marra, M. (2001, January). Economic impacts of transgenic crops: A critical review of the evidence to date. Paper presented at Agricultural Biotechnology: Markets, and Policies in an International Setting Workshop, International Food Policy Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marra, M., Hubbell, B., & Carlson, G. (2001). Information quality, technology depreciation and Bt cotton adoption in the Southeast. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 26, 158–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, B. (1999). Technology issues in plant biotechnology. Nature Biotechnology, 17 (suppl.),9–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, D. (1999). Moving agbiotech downstream. Nature Biotechnology, 17, 1071–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moschini, G., & Lapan, H. (1997). Intellectual property rights and the welfare effects of agricultural R&D. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79, 1229–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98,71–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kooten, G., Weisensel, W., & Chinthammit, D. (1990). Valuing trade-offs between net returns and stewardship practices in the case of soil conservation in Saskatchewan. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72, 104–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kalaitzandonakes, N. (2003). Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agrobiotechnology: An Introduction. In: Kalaitzandonakes, N. (eds) The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0177-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0177-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4954-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0177-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics