Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Uterine Fibroids

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ultrasound Imaging in Reproductive Medicine

Abstract

Uterine fibroids are often identified by ultrasonography during an infertility evaluation, with a peak incidence of 70–80 % of women during the late reproductive years. Precise identification of the size, number, and location of fibroids is determined by ultrasound. In most circumstances, detailed fibroid mapping can be accomplished with transvaginal ultrasonography. Abdominal ultrasound is needed when the uterus is large, when fibroid calcification limits uterine assessment, or when the ovaries cannot be identified with transvaginal ultrasound. Saline infusion sonohysterography is extremely useful to identify submucous fibroids and to define the relationship of intramural fibroids and the endometrial cavity. Three-dimensional sonography provides diagnostic insight when complex uterine abnormalities are identified. Tubal patency can be assessed by infusing saline and air bubbles during sonography and the examiner can determine if an adjacent fibroid is the cause of proximal tubal occlusion. Most uterine fibroids are asymptomatic, but some cause significant morbidity. Submucosal fibroids reduce fertility and compromise pregnancy, and outcomes are improved after hysteroscopic myomectomy. In select cases of hysteroscopic myomectomy, concurrent abdominal ultrasound helps to provide guidance and enhances the safety and efficacy of the procedure. Women with untreated fibroids have a higher incidence of maternal and fetal pregnancy-related complications, and there is increasing evidence that fertility and pregnancy outcomes are improved following myomectomy. Laparoscopic or abdominal myomectomy is appropriate for women with symptomatic intramural, subserosal, or pedunculated fibroids who desire fertility. Intracorporeal ultrasound may be useful when a fibroid deviates the endometrial cavity but cannot be identified by visual inspection of the uterus during myomectomy. Approximately 50 % of women conceive after myomectomy, and IVF outcomes may improve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Rahimi S, Negro R, Cavallotti C, Vergara D, Vittori G, Mettler L. Myoma pseudocapsule: a distinct endocrino-anatomical entity in gynecological surgery. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2009;25:661–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ishikawa H, Reierstad S, Demura M, Rademaker AW, Kasai T, Inoue M, Usui H, Shozu M, Bulun SE. High aromatase expression in uterine leiomyoma tissues of African-American women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:1752–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ciarmela P, Islam MS, Reis FM, Gray PC, Bloise E, Petraglia F, Vale W, Castellucci M. Growth factors and myometrium: biological effects in uterine fibroid and possible clinical implications. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:772–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Malvasi A, Tinelli A, Cavallotti C, Morroni M, Tsin DA, Nezhat C, Stark M, Mettler L. Distribution of substance P (SP) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) in pseudocapsules of uterine fibroids. Peptides. 2011;32:327–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with Society of Reproductive Surgeons. Myomas and reproductive function. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:S125–30.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baird DD, Dunson DB, Hill MC, Cousins D, Schectman JM. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:100–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Laughlin SK, Schroeder JC, Baird DD. New directions in the epidemiology of uterine fibroids. Semin Reprod Med. 2010;28:204–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL): Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide. AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of submucous leiomyomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19:152–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Olive DL, Pritts EA. Fibroids and reproduction. Semin Reprod Med. 2010;28:218–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Oliveira FG, Abdelmassih VG, Diamond MP, Dozortsev D, Melo NR, Abdelmassih R. Impact of subserosal and intramural uterine fibroids that do not distort the endometrial cavity on the outcome of in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:582–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hart R, Khalaf Y, Yeong CT, Seed P, Taylor A, Braude P. A prospective controlled study of the effect of intramural uterine fibroids on the outcome of assisted conception. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2411–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Metwally M, Farquhar CM, Li TC. Is another meta-analysis on the effects of intramural fibroids on reproductive outcomes needed? Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23:2–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Olive DL. The surgical treatment of fibroids for infertility. Semin Reprod Med. 2011;29:113–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pritts EA, Parker WH, Olive DL. Fibroids and infertility: an updated systematic review of the evidence. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1215–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kroon B, Johnson N, Chapman M, Yazdani A, Hart R, Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence (ACCEPT) group. Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;51:289–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eldar-Geva T, Meagher S, Healy DL, MacLachlan V, Breheny S, Wood C. Effect of intramural, subserosal, and submucosal uterine fibroids on the outcome of assisted reproductive technology treatment. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:687–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Seoud MA, Patterson R, Muasher SJ, Coddington 3rd CC. Effects of myomas or prior myomectomy on in vitro fertilization (IVF) performance. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1992;9:217–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Narayan R, Rajat R, Goswamy K. Treatment of submucous fibroids, and outcome of assisted conception. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994;1:307–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Farhi J, Ashkenazi J, Feldberg D, Dicker D, Orvieto R, Ben Rafael Z. Effect of uterine leiomyomata on the results of in-vitro fertilization treatment. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:2576–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramzy AM, Sattar M, Amin Y, Mansour RT, Serour GI, Aboulghar MA. Uterine myomata and outcome of assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:198–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Somigliana E, De Benedictis S, Vercellini P, Nicolosi AE, Benaglia L, Scarduelli C, Ragni G, Fedele L. Fibroids not encroaching the endometrial cavity and IVF success rate: a prospective study. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:834–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Surrey ES, Lietz AK, Schoolcraft WB. Impact of intramural leiomyomata in patients with a normal endometrial cavity on in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycle outcome. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:405–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Benecke C, Kruger TF, Siebert TI, Van der Merwe JP, Steyn DW. Effect of fibroids on fertility in patients undergoing assisted reproduction. A structured literature review. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2005;59:225–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stovall DW, Parrish SB, Van Voorhis BJ, Hahn SJ, Sparks AE, Syrop CH. Uterine leiomyomas reduce the efficacy of assisted reproduction cycles: results of a matched follow-up study. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:192–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sunkara SK, Khairy M, El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Coomarasamy A. The effect of intramural fibroids without uterine cavity involvement on the outcome of IVF treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:418–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bodri D, Guillen JJ, Lopez M, Vernaeve V, Coll O. Racial disparity in oocyte donation outcome: a multiethnic, matched cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:436–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sheiner E, Bashiri A, Levy A, Hershkovitz R, Katz M, Mazor M. Obstetric characteristics and perinatal outcome of pregnancies with uterine leiomyomas. J Reprod Med. 2004;49:182–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Muram D, Gillieson M, Walters JH. Myomas of the uterus in pregnancy: ultrasonographic follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;138:16–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shavell VI, Thakur M, Sawant A, Kruger ML, Jones TB, Singh M, Puscheck EE, Diamond MP. Adverse obstetric outcomes associated with sonographically identified large uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:107–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Klatsky PC, Tran ND, Caughey AB, Fujimoto VY. Fibroids and reproductive outcomes: a systematic literature review from conception to delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:357–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. De Vivo A, Mancuso A, Giacobbe A, Savasta LM, De Dominici R, Dugo N, Dugo C, Vaiarelli A. Uterine myomas during pregnancy: a longitudinal sonographic study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:361–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Campo S, Campo V, Gambadauro P. Reproductive outcome before and after laparoscopic or abdominal myomectomy for subserous or intramural myomas. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;110:215–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hurst BS. Anatomic abnormal uterine bleeding due to anatomic causes. In: Marshburn PB, Hurst BS, editors. Disorders of menstruation. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. p. 86–107.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Hurst BS, Tsin DA, Davila F, Dominguez G, Dell’edera D, Cavallotti C, Negro R, Gustapane S, Teigland CM, Mettler L. Surgical management of neurovascular bundle in uterine fibroid pseudocapsule. JSLS. 2012;16:119–29.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Saunders RD, Shwayder JM, Nakajima ST. Current methods of tubal patency assessment. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:2171–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rajan DK, Margau R, Kroll RR, Simons ME, Tan KT, Jaskolka JD, Kachura JR, Sniderman KW, Beecroft JR, Haider M. Clinical utility of ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for deciding to proceed with uterine artery embolization for presumed symptomatic fibroids. Clin Radiol. 2011;66:57–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Soysal S, Soysal ME. The efficacy of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in selected cases of myoma-related menorrhagia: a prospective controlled trial. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2005;59:29–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Matteson KA, Anderson BL, Pinto SB, Lopes V, Schulkin J, Clark MA. Practice patterns and attitudes about treating abnormal uterine bleeding: a national survey of obstetricians and gynecologists. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:321.e1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hurst BS, Matthews ML, Marshburn PB. Laparoscopic myomectomy for symptomatic uterine myomas. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wallach EE, Vlahos NF. Uterine myomas: an overview of development, clinical features, and management. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:393–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tinelli A, Hurst BS, Hudelist G, Tsin DA, Stark M, Mettler L, Guido M, Malvasi A. Laparoscopic myomectomy focusing on the myoma pseudocapsule: technical and outcome reports. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:427–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Roy KK, Singla S, Baruah J, Sharma JB, Kumar S, Singh N. Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic myomectomy in patients with infertility and recurrent abortions. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;282:553–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Shokeir T, El-Shafei M, Yousef H, Allam AF, Sadek E. Submucous myomas and their implications in the pregnancy rates of patients with otherwise unexplained primary infertility undergoing hysteroscopic myomectomy: a randomized matched control study. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:724–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Camanni M, Bonino L, Delpiano EM, Ferrero B, Migliaretti G, Deltetto F. Hysteroscopic management of large symptomatic submucous uterine myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:59–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hamerlynck TW, Dietz V, Schoot BC. Clinical implementation of the hysteroscopic morcellator for removal of intrauterine myomas and polyps. A retrospective descriptive study. Gynecol Surg. 2011;8:193–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Casadio P, Youssef AM, Spagnolo E, Rizzo MA, Talamo MR, De Angelis D, Marra E, Ghi T, Savelli L, Farina A, Pelusi G, Mazzon I. Should the myometrial free margin still be considered a limiting factor for hysteroscopic resection of submucous fibroids? A possible answer to an old question. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1764–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Chamberlain G. The master of myomectomy. J R Soc Med. 2003;96:302–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kongnyuy EJ, Wiysonge CS. Interventions to reduce haemorrhage during myomectomy for fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;11, CD005355.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. LaMorte AI, Lalwani S, Diamond MP. Morbidity associated with abdominal myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82:897–900.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Manyonda IT, Bratby M, Horst JS, Banu N, Gorti M, Belli AM. Uterine artery embolization versus myomectomy: impact on quality of life–results of the FUME (Fibroids of the Uterus: Myomectomy versus Embolization) Trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012;35:530–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Dilek S, Ertunc D, Tok EC, Cimen R, Doruk A. The effect of myomectomy on health-related quality of life of women with myoma uteri. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36:364–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F, Iuzzolino D, Surico D, Reich H. Laparoscopy versus minilaparotomy in women with symptomatic uterine myomas: short-term and fertility results. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:2368–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Anonymous. An expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier (Gore-Tex surgical membrane) reduces post-myomectomy adhesion formation. The Myomectomy Adhesion Multicenter Study Group. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:491–3.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ahmad G, Duffy JM, Farquhar C, Vail A, Vandekerckhove P, Watson A, Wiseman D. Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;2, CD000475.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sizzi O, Rossetti A, Malzoni M, Minelli L, La Grotta F, Soranna L, Panunzi S, Spagnolo R, Imperato F, Landi S, Fiaccamento A, Stola E. Italian multicenter study on complications of laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:453–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Modi R. Laparoscopic myomectomy with aquadissection and barbed sutures. J Gynec Endosc Surg. 2011;2:47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Mansour FW, Kives S, Urbach DR, Lefebvre G. Robotically assisted laparoscopic myomectomy: a Canadian experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;34:353–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Nezhat C, Lavie O, Hsu S, Watson J, Barnett O, Lemyre M. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy–a retrospective matched control study. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:556–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Jung YW, Kim YT, Lee DW, Hwang YI, Nam EJ, Kim JH, Kim SW. The feasibility of scarless single-port transumbilical total laparoscopic hysterectomy: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1686–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Landon MB, Lynch CD. Optimal timing and mode of delivery after cesarean with previous classical incision or myomectomy: a review of the data. Semin Perinatol. 2011;35:257–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Usadi RS, Marshburn PB. The impact of uterine artery embolization on fertility and pregnancy outcome. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19:279–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Rabinovici J, David M, Fukunishi H, Morita Y, Gostout BS, Stewart EA, MRgFUS Study Group. Pregnancy outcome after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) for conservative treatment of uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:199–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kim HS, Baik JH, Pham LD, Jacobs MA. MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for symptomatic uterine leiomyomata: long-term outcomes. Acad Radiol. 2011;18:970–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Behera MA, Leong M, Johnson L, Brown H. Eligibility and accessibility of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) for the treatment of uterine leiomyomas. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1864–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Hesley GK, Gorny KR, Henrichsen TL, Woodrum DA, Brown DL. A clinical review of focused ultrasound ablation with magnetic resonance guidance: an option for treating uterine fibroids. Ultrasound Q. 2008;24:131–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Comerford KP, Hurst BS. Alternatives to hysterectomy for symptomatic uterine leiomyomata. Female Patient. 2012;37(8):29–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carolinas Healthcare System, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive, Suite 500, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA

    Bradley S. Hurst MD

Authors
  1. Bradley S. Hurst MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley S. Hurst MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine, Norfolk, Virginia, USA

    Laurel Stadtmauer

  2. Institute for Human Reproduction, Chicago, Illinois, USA

    Ilan Tur-Kaspa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hurst, B.S. (2014). Uterine Fibroids. In: Stadtmauer, L., Tur-Kaspa, I. (eds) Ultrasound Imaging in Reproductive Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9182-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9182-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-9181-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-9182-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation