Abstract
The surgical approach to the thyroid compartment has evolved considerably over the last decade. Steady progress toward defining the steps of a safe and thorough thyroidectomy has resulted in a procedure with a success rate approaching 100 % and whose complication rate is minimal. Focus within the discipline of endocrine surgery has therefore shifted beyond the safety and completeness of surgery toward optimizing the cosmetic and quality-of-life outcomes for the patient.
In order to improve the convenience of thyroid and parathyroid surgery for patients requiring surgical intervention, surgeons have learned that the use of drains is no longer necessary. It has further been demonstrated that thyroid and parathyroid surgery may be safely performed on an outpatient basis with attention to several specific cautionary methods. These concepts will be covered in greater detail in other chapters. The emphasis on cosmetic outcomes is natural, given the fact that the patient population requiring endocrine neck surgery is largely comprised of women and often young women. They are more likely to develop thyroid nodules, more likely to require surgical intervention for thyroid cancer, and more likely to suffer from hyperparathyroidism. There is a well-recognized tendency for women to harbor more concern about the appearance of a neck scar than men. Because of concomitant advances in technology, and notably the advent of advanced energy devices, the availability of robust nerve monitoring, and the application of high-resolution endoscopy to the thyroid compartment, incorporation of minimal access surgery with or without the use of endoscopes has emerged. A second and more recent trend has been the effort to completely move the scar off of the neck, represented by remote access surgery with or without use of the robot.
The performance of these procedures provides the opportunity to pursue personalized surgery which is customized to the patient and their disease characteristics, in keeping with the principles of patient- and family-centered care.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Recommended Reading
Holsinger FC, Kuppersmith RB, Chung WY. Robotic and extracervical approaches to the thyroid and parathyroid glands: a modern classification scheme. In: Randolph GW, editor. Surgery of the thyroid and parathyroid glands. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2013.
Ikeda Y, Takami H, Sasaki Y, Kan S, Niimi M. Endoscopic neck surgery by the axillary approach. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191(3):336–40.
Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Yun JS, Sung TY, Lee SC, Lee YS, Nam KH, Chang HS, Chung WY, Park CS. Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients. Surg Endosc. 2009a;23(11):2399–406.
Kang SW, Lee SC, Lee SH, Lee KY, Jeong JJ, Lee YS, Nam KH, Chang HS, Chung WY, Park CS. Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: the operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients. Surgery. 2009b;146(6):1048–55.
Lee KE, Rao J, Youn YK. Endoscopic thyroidectomy with the da Vinci robot system using the bilateral axillary breast approach (BABA) technique: our initial experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19(3):e71–5.
Lee KE, Koo do H, Kim SJ, Lee J, Park KS, Oh SK, Youn YK. Outcomes of 109 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma who underwent robotic total thyroidectomy with central node dissection via the bilateral axillo-breast approach. Surgery. 2010;148(6):1207–13.
Lee S, Ryu HR, Park JH, Kim KH, Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Nam KH, Chung WY, Park CS. Early surgical outcomes comparison between robotic and conventional open thyroid surgery for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Surgery. 2012;151(5):724–30.
Miccoli P, Berti P, Conte M, Bendinelli C, Marcocci C. Minimally invasive surgery for thyroid small nodules: preliminary report. J Endocrinol Invest. 1999;22(11):849–51.
Miccoli P, Berti P, Ambrosini CE. Perspectives and lessons learned after a decade of minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2008;70(5):282–6.
Pothier DD. The use of drains following thyroid and parathyroid surgery: a meta-analysis. J Laryngol Otol. 2005;119(9):669–71.
Seybt MW, Terris DJ. Outpatient thyroidectomy: experience in over 200 patients. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(5):959–63.
Snyder SK, Hamid KS, Roberson CR, Rai SS, Bossen AC, Luh JH, Scherer EP, Song J. Outpatient thyroidectomy is safe and reasonable: experience with more than 1,000 planned outpatient procedures. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(5):575–82, 582–4.
Terris DJ, Seybt MW. Modifications of Miccoli minimally invasive thyroidectomy for the low-volume surgeon. Am J Otolaryngol. 2011;32(5):392–7.
Terris DJ, Bonnett A, Gourin CG, Chin E. Minimally invasive thyroidectomy using the Sofferman technique. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(6):1104–8.
Terris DJ, Singer MC, Seybt MW. Robotic facelift thyroidectomy: II. Clinical feasibility and safety. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(8):1636–41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Terris, D.J. (2014). Principles and Philosophy of Minimally Invasive and Remote Access Endocrine Surgery. In: Terris, D., Singer, M. (eds) Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9011-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9011-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-9010-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-9011-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)