Skip to main content

Methodological Pathways for Avoiding Pitfalls in Multivocality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Productive Multivocality in the Analysis of Group Interactions

Part of the book series: Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series ((CULS,volume 15))

Abstract

This chapter explores multivocality from a methodological perspective. A conceptual model is presented for thinking about multivocality and how it relates to methodological traditions. We reflect back on what we have learned through experimentation with multivocality through the five data sections of the book and draw principles for best practices that we offer to the broader research community. As a running theme throughout the chapter, and as an invitation to disseminate multivocality to the next generation of researchers in our field, we contrast the experience of expert analysts whose work is presented in the preceding data sections with the experience of students working in groups on their first discourse analysis project in the context of a Computational Models of Discourse Analysis (CMDA) class.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bakhtin, M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. & Looi, C.-K. (this volume). Group Scribbles-supported collaborative learning in a primary grade 5 science class. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rose, C. Teplovs & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 14. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, M. M. (this volume). Social metacognition, micro-creativity and justifications: Statistical discourse analysis of a mathematics classroom conversation. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rosé, C. Teplovs & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 7. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, M. M. (this volume). Statistical discourse analysis of an online discussion: Cognition and social metacognition. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rosé, C. Teplovs & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 23. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (this volume). Successful knowledge building needs group awareness: Interaction analysis of a 9th grade CSCL biology lesson. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rosé, C. Teplovs & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 27. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyke, G., Howley, I. K., Kumar, R., & Rosé, C. P. (this volume). Towards academically productive talk supported by conversational agents. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rosé, C. Teplovs & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 25. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, N. (this volume). Critical reflections on multivocal analysis and implications for design-based research. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rosé, C. Teplovs & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 24. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Goggins, S. P., & Dyke, G. (this volume). Network analytic techniques for online chat. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rosé, C. Teplovs & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 29. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Golato, A. (2003). Studying compliment responses: A comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occurring talk. Applied Linguistics 24/1, 90–121, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Howley, I. K., Kumar, R., Mayfield, E., Dyke, G., & Rosé, C. P. (this volume). Gaining insights from sociolinguistic style analysis for redesign of conversational agent based support for collaborative learning. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rosé, C. Teplovs & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 26. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Howley, I. K., Mayfield, E., Rosé, C. P., & Strijbos, J.-W. (this volume). A multivocal process analysis of social positioning in study groups. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rosé, C. Teplovs & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 11. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, H. (this volume). Development of group understanding via the construction of physical and technological artifacts. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rose, C. Teplovs & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 18. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, N., & Laferriere, T. (this volume). Multivocality in interaction analysis: Implications for practice. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rosé, C. Teplovs & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 35. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, N., & Wong, O.-W. (this volume). Exploring pivotal moments in students’ knowledge building progress using participation and discourse marker indicators as heuristic guides. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rosé, C. Teplovs & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 22. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, K., & Bécu-Robinault, K. (this volume). Conceptual change and sustainable coherency of concepts across modes of interaction. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rose, C. Teplovs & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 17. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, K., Rosé, C. P., Suthers, D. D., & Baker, M. (this volume). Epistemological encounters in multivocal settings. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rosé, C. Teplovs & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 34. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina, R. (this volume). Cascading inscriptions and practices: Diagramming and experimentation in the group scribbles classroom. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rose, C. Teplovs & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 16. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (2004). Discourse analysis. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 607–624). London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, (1996a). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 161–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, (1996b). Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: A partial sketch of a systematics. In B. A. Fox (Ed.), Studies in anaphora. (pp. 437–485). Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. (1999). Discourse, pragmatics, conversation analysis. Discourse Studies, 1(4), 405–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirouzu, H. (this volume). Focus-based constructive interaction. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rosé, C. Teplovs & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 5. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Speer, S. (2002). “Natural” and “contrived” data: A sustainable distinction. Discourse Studies, 4, 511–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (this volume). Interaction analysis of a biology chat. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rosé, C. Teplovs & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 28. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinhauser, K., Clipp, E., McNeilly, M., Christakis, N., McIntyre, L., & Tulsky, J. (2000). In search of a good death: Observations of patients, families, and health care providers. Annals of Internal Medicine, 132, 825–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. D. (this volume). Agency and modalities in multimediated interaction. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rosé, C. Teplovs & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 19. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Teplovs, C., & Fujita, N. (this volume). Socio-dynamic latent semantic learner models. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rosé, C. Teplovs & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 21. New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Pittsburgh Science of Learning Center and Graduate Training Grant from the Department of Education (#R305B040063) and by the French CNRS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn Penstein Rosé .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rosé, C.P., Lund, K. (2013). Methodological Pathways for Avoiding Pitfalls in Multivocality. In: Suthers, D., Lund, K., Rosé, C., Teplovs, C., Law, N. (eds) Productive Multivocality in the Analysis of Group Interactions. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 15. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8960-3_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics