Skip to main content

Reconstructing Ancient Head-Shaping Traditions from the Skeletal Record

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Bioarchaeology of Artificial Cranial Modifications

Part of the book series: Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology ((IDCA,volume 7))

  • 1241 Accesses

Abstract

In archaeological record, the ancient tradition of head shaping is prone to leave tangible impressions in the skulls. The systematic examination of ancient skulls allows scholarship to recreate the modeling techniques and their morphological results, even in those past populations that have left no written record. This chapter reviews different typologies that have been employed in the classification of artificially modified crania of American, and specifically Mesoamerican, modeling techniques and modeling implements. I describe at length a cranial typology adapted from the taxonomy of José Imbelloni, an Italo-Argentinian anthropologist who originally proposed it 80 years ago. Today, this classification system is employed together with craniometrical criteria in most studies on Mesoamerican and Andean cranial modifications. Its standardized use benefits comparisons within and between areas and warrants inferences of Mesoamerican shaping techniques and implements, which are explored subsequently in this chapter. From here, broader bioarchaeological and contextual criteria are given that provide useful points of departure for inferring the social dimensions and temporal trends of past head-molding practices. Such are the skeletal attributes of sex and age and a set of associated mortuary attributes, materialized in the form of graves’ construction and offerings, architectural associations and orientation.

Now they are gone with all their songs and sins,Women and men, to dust; their copper penny,Of livings, spent, among these dusty inns;The glittering one made level with the many.

Their speech is gone, none speaks it, none can read The pictured writing of their conqueror’s march;The dropping plaster of fading screedCeils with its mildred the decaying arch.John Masefield (2005 [1920–1923], p. 96)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    During the nineteenth century, in most French regions or departments, infant heads were still molded with hair ribbons or bandages (bandeau or crémé). In some areas, tight caps and preformed head-dresses (serre têtes, béguins, fromages) were put on daily. Head restrictions of this kind were widely distributed in rural France and many of the resulting forms were recognized as characteristic of certain areas, confirming their cultural quality as head modification (Delisle 1880, 1902; Dingwall 1931, pp. 46–61; Pereira da Silva and Miya 1994).

  2. 2.

    The original Latin version reads: “medioci constant corpais habitudine colore frisco ocuis magnis fronte navibus, plano occiputio, quaquarium parentens hos fiat indishia… ad pularitudianaum apectare puntuant frontes parvas et refetas capillis ac fire nulum occipitum quod eneris quo que ferendi causa deprimitus unión cal < varia et teenrrina servatuga en figura sipinis lascatibus in canis…”

References

  • Allison, Marvin J., Enrique Gerszten, Juan Munizaga, Calogero Santoro, and Guillermo Focacci. 1981. La práctica de la deformación craneana entre los pueblos andinos precolombinos. Chungara 7:238–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anton, Susan C. 1989. Intentional cranial vault deformation and induced changes of the cranial base and face. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 79:253–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armas, Juan Ignacio de. 1885. Les cránes dits déformés; memoire lu en espagnol a la Societé Anthropologique de la Havane. Cuba: El Fénix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, Wolfgang H., Victoria A. Fedorischeva, Ella A. Naumova, and Nicolay I. Yabluchansky. 2008. Craniometric measurement of artificial cranial deformation in eastern European skulls. Anthropologischer Anzeiger 66:139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrientos, G., and L. L’Heureux. 2009. Una aproximación bioarqueológica al estudio del poblamiento prehispánico tardío del sudeste de la región Pampeana. Revista Intersecciones en Antropología 2:3–18. Buenos Aires: UNCPBA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bautista, Josefina. 2004. Evidencias de deformación cefálica intencional en figurillas prehispánicas de México. Ph.D. diss., Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béguelin, Marien, Valeria Bernal, Mariano Del Papa, Paula Novellino y Gustavo Barrientos. 2006. El poblamiento humano tardío del sur de Mendoza y su relación con el norte de Patagonia: una discusión bioarqueológica. Anales de Arqueología y Etnología 61:5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björk, Arne, and Lise Björk. 1964. Artificial deformation and craniofacial asymmetry in ancient Peruvians. Journal of Dental Research 43(3):353–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, Deborah E. 2005. Embodying borders: Human body modification and diversity in Tiwanaku society. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 24:1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas, Franz. 1890. Cranium from Progreso, Yucatan. Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society 6:350–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buikstra, Jane E. 2006. A historical introduction. In Bioarchaeology. The contextual analysis of human remains, ed. Jane E. Buikstra and Lane A. Beck, 7–25. Burlington: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buikstra, Jane E., and Douglas Ubelaker, (ed.). 1994. Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Fayetteville: Arkansas Archaeological Survey Research Series No. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavatrunci, Claudio, Giuseppe Orefici, and Claudia Terenzi. 1992. Centro America. Tesori d’Arte delle Civiltá Precolombiana. Milán: Fabbri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheverud, James M., and James E. Midkiff. 1992. Effects of fronto-occipital cranial reshaping on mandibular form. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 87:167–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheverud, James M., Luci A. P. Kohn, Lyle W. Konigsberg, and Steven R. Leigh. 1992. Effects of fronto-occipital artificial cranial vault modification on the cranial base and face. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 88:323–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J.L., S. D. Dobson, S. C. Antón, J. Hawks, K. L. Hunley, and M. H. Wolpoff. 2007. Identifying artificially deformed crania. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 17:596–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comas, Juan. 1958. La deformación cefálica intencional en la región del Ucayali, Perú. In Miscelánea Paul Rivet, 109–119. México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comas, Juan. 1960. Datos para la historia de la deformación craneal en México. Historia Mexicana 36:509–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comas, Juan. 1970a. José Imbelloni (obituario). Anales de antropología 7:290–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comas, Juan. 1970b. History of physical anthropology in Middle America. In Physical Anthropology. Handbook of Middle American Indians, Vol. 9, ed. R. Wauchope and T. Dale Stewart, 3–21. Austin: University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comas, Juan, and Paulette Marquer. 1969. Crânes déformés de l’île de Sacrificios (État de Veracruz, Mexique). Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d’anthropologie de Paris 4(3):209–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crist, Thomas A. J., Arthur Washburn, Hydrow Park, Ian Hood, and Molly A. Hickey. 1997. Cranial bone displacement as a taphonomic process in potential child abuse cases. In Forensic taphonomy. The postmortem fate of human remains, ed. William D. Haglund and Marcella H. Sorg, 319–336. Florida: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, Joane. 2007. On the etiology of occipital lytic lesions in artificially deformed crania. Supplement to the paleopathology newsletter: Annual meeting 2007, 17–18. Philadelphia: Paleopathology Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dávalos, Eusebio. 1951. La deformación craneana entre los tlatelolca. B.A. and Masters diss., Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dávalos, Eusebio. 1965. La osteología mexicana en el Museo del Hombre. In Temas de antropología física, ed. Eusebio Dávalos, 103–116. Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dávalos, Eusebio, and Arturo Romano. 1965. Las deformaciones corporales entre los mexicas. In Temas de Antropología Física, ed. Eusebio Dávalos, 75–102. Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delisle, Fernand. 1880. Contribution a l’étude des déformations artificielles du crâne. Ph.D. diss., Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delisle, Fernand. 1902. Les déformations artificielles du crâne en France, carte de leur distribution. Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris 3(serie V):111–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembo Adolfo, and José Imbelloni. 1938. Deformaciones intencionales del cuerpo humano de carácter étnico. Buenos Aires: Biblioteca Humanior.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingwall, Eric J. 1931. Artificial cranial deformation. A contribution to the study of ethnic mutilations. London: Bale & Sons & Danielsson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, William N. 2009. Cranial modification among the maya: Absence of evidence or evidence of absence?. In Bioarchaeology and identity in the Americas, ed. Kelly Knudson and Christopher Stojanowski, 177–193. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, William, and Charles Hofling. 2011. Why the head? Cranial modification as protection and ensoulment among the maya. Ancient Mesoamerica 22:199–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenburger, Fédéric. 1938. Récherches anthropologiques sur la déformation artificielle du crâne. Revista de Antropología de la Universidad de Tucumán 1:1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flower, William H. 1881. Fashion in deformity. London: Nature Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foville, Achille. 1834. Influence des vê tements sur nos organes. Déformation du crâ ne résultant de la méthode la plus générale de couvrir la tê te des enfantes. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francisco Paso y Troncoso del. 1926. Códice de la Real Academia de la Historia (facsimile edition, Museo Nacional de México, fols. 46, 47 de Anticuarios Nova Hispania).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller, Pamela. 2006. Altering identities: Body modifications and the pre-Columbian maya. In Social archaeology of funerary remains, ed. Rebecca Gowland and Christopher Knüsel, 279–291. Oxbow: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gervais, Véronique. 1989. Déformations artificielles de crânes préhispaniques au Guatemala et au Mexique. Ph.D. diss., Universidad de Caen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gervais, Véronique. 2001. El uso del mecapal en Guatemala y sus consecuencias sobre la columna cervical (primeras observaciones). Estudios de Antropología Biológica 10: 496–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Valdés, Jorge, Josefina Bautista, and Arturo Romano. 2007. Morfometría geométrica aplicada al estudio de la deformación cefálica intencional. Estudios de antropología biológica 13:117–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosse. Louis. 1855. Déformations artificielles du crâne. Bailliere: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, John M. Jr, Jeannie Kreutzman, Dawn Earl, Andy Halberg, Carlos Samayoa, and Xiuqing Guo. 2005. Deformational brachycephaly in supine-sleeping infants. Journal of Pediatrics 146(2):253–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen Soren. 1919. On posthumous deformation of fossil skulls. Man 19:121–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, Diane Y. 1993. Occipital lesions: A possible cost of cradleboards. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 90(3):283–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdlička, Aleš, and Carl Lumholtz. 1912. Artificial deformations of the human skull with special reference to America. Acts of the 17 International Americanistic Congress, 147–149. Buenos Aires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbelloni, José. 1925. Sobre el número de los tipos fundamentales a los que deben referirse las deformaciones craneanas de los pueblos indígenas de Sudamérica. Anales de la Sociedad Argentina de Estudios Geográficos GAEA 1:183–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbelloni, José. 1930. Die Arten der künstlichen Schädeldeformationen. Zusammenfassender Bericht. Anthropos 25:801–830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbelloni, José. 1933. Los pueblos deformadores de los Andes. Anales del Museo de Historia Natural 37:209–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbelloni, José. 1938. Formas, esencia y metódica de las deformaciones cefálicas intencionales. Revista del Instituto de Antropología de la Universidad de Tucumán 1(1):5–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jácome, Carlos, Fernando González, and Laura Almendros. 2013. El Tropel, Colima. Hallazgo de un deformador craneal de cerámica. Arqueología Mexicana 121:8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaén Esquivel, María T. 1962. Comparación de los métodos para estimar la capacidad craneana. B.A. and Master diss., Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, Katsutomo, Ken-ichi Shinoda, Yoshikazu Kitagawa, Yoshitaka Manabe, Joichi Oyamada, Kazunari Igawa, Hild Vidal, and Atsushi Rokutanda. 2007. A possible case of prophylactic supra-inion trepanation in a child cranium with an auditory deformity (pre-Columbian Ancon site, Perú). Anthropological Science 115:227–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, Luci Ann, Steven Leigh, and James Cheverud. 1995. Asymmetric vault modification in Hopi crania. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 98:173–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krejci, Estella, and Patrick Culbert. 1995. Preclassic and Classic burials and caches in the Maya Lowlands. In The emergence of Lowland Maya civilization, ed. Nikolai Grube, 103–116. Acta Mesoamericana 8, Möckmühl: Verlag Anton Saurwein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagunas, Zaid. 1970. Nota sobre el hallazgo de cráneos con lesión supra-iniana en Cholula. Boletín del Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia 39:1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagunas, Zaid. 1972. La trepanación suprainiana en cráneos de Cholula, Puebla. Comunicaciones Proyecto Puebla Tlaxcala 8:47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagunas, Zaid. 1974. Observaciones recientes sobre la lesión suprainiana. Boletín del Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia 11(2nd series):47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagunas, Zaid. 1989. Los antiguos habitantes de Cholula: Prácticas osteoculturales. Notas Americanas 11:8–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozada, María Cecilia. 2011. Marking ethnicity through premortem cranial modification among the Pre-Inca Chiribaya, Perú. In The bioarchaeology of the human head. Decapitation, decoration, and deformation, ed. Michelle Bonogofsky, 228–240. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magitot, Émile. 1884. Essai sur les mutilations ethniques. CRAA, 9th Session, 549–622. Lisbonne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manríquez, Germán, Fermín E. González, Juan Carlos Salinas, and Oscar Espoueys. 2006. Deformación intencional del cráneo en poblaciones arqueológicas de Arica, Chile: Análisis preliminar de morfometría geométrica con uso de radiografías craneofaciales. Chungara 38(1):13–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez, Blanca Lilia. 2009. La deformación cefálica intencional tipo tabular, variante superior, en el Zapotal, Veracruz. Estudios de Antropología Biológica 14:489–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masefield, John. 2005 [1920–1923]. Enslaved and other poems by John Masefield. Montana: Kessinger Publishing Reprints.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Otis T., and J. H. Porter. 1889. Cradles of the American aborigines with notes on the artificial deformation of children among savage and civilized peoples. Washington: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, William, and George Newton. 1965. Cranial base morphology in association with intentional cranial vault deformation. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 23(3):241–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendieta, Gerónimo de. 1997. Historia eclesiástica Indiana, Vol. 1. México: Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Mary E. 1995. Bonampak. Arqueología Mexicana 16:48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, Samuel G. 1839. Crania americana. Philadelphia: John Pennington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, Samuel G. 1841. Mexican crania: Otomí, Chichimec, Tlascalan, Aztec. Proceedings of the National Academy Sciences 1:50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, Melvin L. 1958. The pathogenesis of artificial cranial deformation. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 16(3):269–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munizaga, Juan R. 1974. Deformación craneal y momificación en Chile. Anales de Antropología 11:329–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Greg C., and Felicia C. Mandimenos. 2010. Obelionic cranial deformation in the Puebloan Southwest. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 143:465–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, George K. 1942. Types of artificial cranial deformation in the eastern United States. American Antiquity 3:307–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardal, Ramón. 1938. La deformación intencional del cráneo por los indios de América. Actas Ciba 3:67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, Grégory. 1999. Potrero de Guadalupe: anthropologie funéraire d’une communauté pré-tarasque du nord du Michoacán, Mexique. Oxford: British Archaeological Research International Series 816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira da Silva, Miya A. 1994. Du bandeau aux couvre-chefs ou les origines de la ‘déformation toulousiaine’. Musé de’l Homme 4:51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez, Sergio Iván, Claudia Della, Paula Novellino, Paula N. González, Valeria Bernal, Estela Cuneo, and Adam Hajduk 2009. Deformaciones artificiales del cráneo en cazadores-recolectores del Holoceno medio-tardío del noroeste de Patagonia. Magallana 37:77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, Emma, Jay T. Stock, Sonia R. Zakrzewski, and Marta Mirazón. 2010. A metric study of three types of artificial cranial modification from North-Central Perú. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 20:317–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhode, Matthew, and Bernardo T. Arriaza. 2006. Influence of cranial deformation on facial morphology among prehistoric south central Andean populations. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 130:462–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Charlotte A. 2009. Human remains in archaeology: A handbook. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Spencer. 1975. Artificial deformation of the head. New World examples of ethnic mutilation and notes on its consequences. San Diego: San Diego Museum Papers 8, Museum of Balbao Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, Arturo. 1965. Estudio morfológico de la deformación craneana en Tamuín, S.L.P., y en la Isla del Idolo, Veracruz. Serie de Investigaciones 10. Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, Arturo. 1973. Deformación cefálica intencional en la población prehispánica de Cholula, Puebla. Comunicaciones Proyecto Puebla Tlaxcala 8:49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, Arturo. 1974. Deformación cefálica intencional. In Antropología Física, Época Prehispánica, ed. Juan Comas, 197–227. Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, Arturo. 1975. Dólicocéfalos prehispánicos de Teotenango, México. In Memorias del XLI Congreso Internacional de Americanistas, 1974, 417–463. Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, Arturo. 1977. Los cráneos deformados de El Zapotal. In Las Esculturas en Terracota de El Zapotal, Veracruz, ed. Nelly Gutierrez Solana and Susan K. Hamilton, 31. Mexico: Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, Arturo. 1980. The skull from El Pajon, Chiapas. Papers of the New World Archaeological Foundation 44: 95–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, Arturo. 1987. Iconografía cefálica maya. In Memorias del Primer Coloquio Internacional de Mayistas, 1413–1474. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, Arturo. 1996. La craneología antropológica en México. In La antropología física en México. Estudio sobre la población antigua y contemporánea, ed. Sergio López, Carlos Serrano, and Lourdes Márquez, 35–54. Mexico: Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez Saldaña, Patricia. 1971. Cuicuilco: Estudio osteológico de la población prehispánica. B.A. diss., Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saul, Frank. 1972. The human skeletal remains of Altar de Sacrificios. An osteobiographic analysis. Cambridge: Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 63, no. 2, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano, Carlos. 1973. La lesión suprainiana en Mesoamérica: Implicaciones arqueológicas. Estudios de la Cultura Maya 9:29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, John, and Frederick Catherwood. 1963 [1843]. Incidents of travel in Yucatan, 2 vols. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. Dale. 1937. Discussion and correspondence: Different types of cranial deformity in the Pueblo Area. American Anthropologist 39:169–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. Dale. 1939. A new type of artificial cranial deformation from Florida. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 29(10):460–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. Dale. 1941. The circular type of cranial deformity in the United States. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 28:343–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. Dale. 1943a. Skeletal remains with cultural associations from the Chicama, Moche, and Virú Valleys, Perú. Proceedings of the United States National Museum. Smithsonian Institution 93:153–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. Dale. 1943b. Skeletal remains from Tajamulco, Guatemala. In Excavations at Tajamulco, Guatemala, ed. Bertha Dutton and Hilda R. Hobbs:111–114. Albuquerque: Monographs of the School of American Research 9, University of New Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. Dale. 1948. The true form of the cranial deformity originally described under the name “T ete Trilobé”. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 38(2):66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. Dale. 1953. Skeletal remains from Zaculeu, Guatemala. In The ruins of Zaculeu, Guatemala, Vol. 1, ed. Richard B. Woodbury and Aubrey S. Trik, 295–311. Richmond: William Byrd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. Dale. 1958. Skeletal remains from Venado Beach, Panama: Cranial deformity. Congreso Internacional de Americanistas 33(3):45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. Dale. 1963. Deformity, trephining, and mutilation in South American indian skeletal remains. Handbook of South American Indians 6:43–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. Dale. 1975. Human remains from Dzibilchaltun, Yucatan, Mexico, with a review of cranial deformity types in the Maya region. Papers of the Middle American Research Institute, Vol. 31. New Orleans: Tulane University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, T. Dale. 1976. Are supra-inion depressions evidence of prophylactic trephination?. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 50(3):414–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stojanowski, Christopher M. and Julie Euber. 2011. Technical note: Comparability of Hrdlička’s catalog of crania data based on measurement landmark definitions. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 146(1):143–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiesler, Vera. 1998. La costumbre de la deformación cefálica entre los antiguos mayas: Aspectos morfológicos y culturales. Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiesler, Vera. 1999. Rasgos bioculturales entre los antiguos mayas: Aspectos arqueológicos y sociales. Ph.D. diss., Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiesler, Vera. 2006. ¿Hubo trepanación en la antigua sociedad maya? Una apreciación regional. Antropología Física Latinoamericana 4:169–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiesler, Vera. 2007. Bases conceptuales para la evaluación de restos humanos en arqueología. Mexico: Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiesler, Vera. 2010. “Olmec” head shapes among the Preclassic period maya and cultural meanings. Latin American Antiquity 21(3):290–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiesler, Vera. 2011. Becoming Maya: Infancy and upbringing through the lens of pre-hispanic head shaping. Childhood in the Past 4:117–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiesler, Vera. 2012a. Transformarse en maya. El modelado cefálico entre los mayas prehispánicos y coloniales. Mexico: Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiesler, Vera. 2012b. Studying cranial vault modifications in ancient Mesoamerica. Journal of Anthropological Sciences 90:1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiesler, Vera, Arturo Romano, Jorge Gómez-Valdés, and Annick Daneels. 2013. Posthumous body manipulation in the Classic period Mixtequilla: Reevaluating the human remains of Ossuary I from El Zapotal, Veracruz. Latin American Antiquity 24:47–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Rouff, Christina. 2002. Cranial vault modification and ethnicity in Middle Horizon San Pedro de Atacama, North Chile. Current Anthropology 43(1):163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Rouff, Christina. 2003. Shaping identity: Cranial vault modification in the Pre-Columbian Andes. Ph.D. diss., University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus, Erik. 1982. Artificial cranial deformation in the Shanidar 1 and 5 Neandertals. Current Anthropology 23(2):198–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus, Erik. 1983. The Shanidar Neanderthals. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virchow, Rodolphe. 1888. La craneologie américaine. Congrés International des Americanistes 251–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virchow, Rodolphe. 1890. Sur la craneologie américaine. 7 Congrés International des Americanistes, 251–262, Berlín.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Pedro. 1961. Osteología cultural. Prácticas cefálicas. Lima: Universidad Nacional de San Marcos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Pedro. 1962. Tipología de las deformaciones cefálicas de los antiguos peruanos, según la osteología cultural. Revista del Museo Nacional 31:15–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Pedro. 1967. Ensayo de osteología cultural en Guatemala. Antropología e Historia de Guatemala 19:14–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Pedro. 1981. La trepanación ritual suprainiana. Boletín de la Sociedad Mexicana de Historia y Filosofía de la Medicina 36:193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, W. Bruce. 1988. An Analysis of Classic Lowland Maya Burials. London: International Series 40, British Archaeological Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winning, Hasso von. 1968. Process of head deformation shown by Mesoamerican figurines. The Masterkey 42(2):53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Lori. 2006. Diet, health, and status among the Pasión maya. A reappraisal of the collapse, Vol. 2. Nashville: Vanderbilt Institute of Mesoamerica, Archaeological Series 2, Vanderbilt University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yépez, Rosaura. 2001. El Modelado cefálico intencional en los pobladores prehispánicos del barrio teotihuacano de la Ventilla. Exploración 1992–1994. Master diss., Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yépez, Rosaura. 2006. La práctica cultural de modelar la cabeza en dos culturas andinas del Antiguo Perú: Paracas y Chancay. Un estudio de los procesos de significación de la cabeza modelada intencionalmente. Ph.D. diss., Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yépez, Rosaura. 2009. El simbolismo de la modificación cultural de la cabeza en la cultura andina de Paracas del antiguo Perú. Estudios de Antropología Biológica 14(2):526–543.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vera Tiesler Ph.D. .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tiesler, V. (2014). Reconstructing Ancient Head-Shaping Traditions from the Skeletal Record. In: The Bioarchaeology of Artificial Cranial Modifications. Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology, vol 7. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8760-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics