Abstract
Robotic surgeons are faced with an increasing array of complex clinical scenarios in the management of localized prostate cancer. With appropriate preparation and resource utilization, many of these “difficult cases” can be handled safely and efficiently. Securing obese patients adequately to the operating table and preventing port slippage is important in minimizing long case times and complications in these patients. In patients with large prostates, a well-developed posterior plane prior to bladder neck transection minimizes risk of injuring nearby structures. Use of a retraction suture or the fourth arm to elevate a median lobe can assist in patients with significant intravesical prostatic lobes. Bladder neck reconstruction may be necessary, and however be easily performed with lateral figure-of-eight stitches, which can also internalize the ureteral orifices. RARP can safely be performed in patients with prior bladder outlet, hernia, or multiple abdominal operations, although patients with prior TURP may have an increased risk of postoperative incontinence. An extended lymphadenectomy can be efficiently performed robotically, and increases prognostic and therapeutic yield of the operation without significantly increasing morbidity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71.
Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 10-K Annual report pursuant to section 13 and 15(d), filed on 2/1/11, filed period 12/31/10. http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=122359&p=irol-sec&secCat011_rs=1&secCat01.1_re-10
Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, et al. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA. 2002;288:1723–7.
Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, et al. Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1625–38.
Amling CL, Riffenburgh RH, Sun L, et al. Pathologic variables and recurrence rates as related to obesity and race in men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:439–45.
MacInnis RJ, English DR. Body size and composition and prostate cancer risk: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Cancer Causes Control. 2006;17:989–1003.
Capitanio U, Suardi N, Briganti A, et al. Influence of obesity on tumour volume in patients with prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2012;109:678–84.
Campeggi A, Xylinas E, Ploussard G, et al. Impact of body mass index on perioperative morbidity, oncological, and functional outcomes after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2012;80:576–84.
Wiltz AL, Shikanov S, Eggener SE, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes. Urology. 2009;73(2):316–22.
Castle EP, Atug F, Woods M, et al. Impact of body mass index on outcomes after robot assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2008;26(1):91–5.
Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Edwards R, et al. Impact of obesity on clinical outcomes in robotic prostatectomy. Urology. 2005;65(4):740–4.
Chan RC, Barocas DA, Chang SS, et al. Effect of a large prostate gland on open and robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2008;101(9):1140–4.
Huang AC, Kowalczyk KJ, Hevelone ND, et al. The impact of prostate size, median lobe, and prior benign prostatic hyperplasia intervention on robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: technique and outcomes. Eur Urol. 2011;59(4):595–603.
Zorn KC, Orvieto MA, Mikhail AA, et al. Effect of prostate weight on operative and postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology. 2007;69(2):300–5.
Link BA, Nelson R, Josephson DY, et al. The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;180(3):928–32.
Rehman J, Chughtai B, Guru K, et al. Management of an enlarged median lobe with ureteral orifices at the margin of the bladder neck during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Can J Urol. 2009;16:4490–4.
Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Guglielmetti GB, et al. Does the presence of median lobe affect outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy? J Endourol. 2012;26(3):264–70.
Meeks JJ, Zhao L, Greco KA, et al. Impact of prostate median lobe anatomy on robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology. 2009;73(2):323–7.
Gupta NP, Singh P, Nayyar R, et al. Outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with previous transurethral resection of the prostate. BJU Int. 2011;108(9):1501–5.
Jaffe J, Stakhovsky O, Cathelineau X, et al. Surgical outcomes for men undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol. 2007;178:483–7.
Katz R, Borkowski T, Hoznek A, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients following transurethral resection of the prostate. Urol Int. 2006;77:216–21.
Erdogru T, Teber D, Frede T, et al. The effect of previous transperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy on transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005;173(3):769–72.
Laungani RG, Kaul S, Muhletaler F, et al. Impact of previous inguinal hernia repair on transperitoneal robotic prostatectomy. Can J Urol. 2007;14(4):3635–9.
Hiafler M, Benjamin B, Ghinea R, et al. The impact of previous laparoscopic hernia repair on radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2012;26(11):1458–62.
Kim W, Abdelshehid C, Lee HJ, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in umbilical hernia patients: University of California, Irvine, technique for port placement and repair. Urology. 2012;79(6):1412–7.
Siddiqui SA, Krane LS, Bhandari A. The impact of previous inguinal or abdominal surgery on outcomes after robotic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2010;75(5):1079–82.
Atug F, Castle EP, Woods M, et al. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: is one better than the other? Urology. 2006;68(5):1077–81.
Horstmann M, Vollmer C, Schwab C, et al. Single-centre evaluation of the extraperitoneal and transperitoneal approach in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2012;46(2):117–23.
Boylu U, Oommen M, Raynor M, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients with previous abdominal surgery: a novel laparoscopic adhesiolysis technique. J Endourol. 2010;24(2):229–32.
Joslyn SA, Konety BR. Impact of extent of lymphadenectomy on survival after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Urology. 2006;68:121–5.
Hyndman ME, Mullins JK, Pavlovich CP. Pelvic node dissection in prostate cancer: extended, limited, or not at all? Curr Opin Urol. 2010;20(3):211–7.
Yuh BE, Ruel NH, Mejia R, et al. Standardized comparison of robot-assisted limited and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2013;112(1):81–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jayram, G., Allaf, M.E. (2014). Challenging Cases in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy. In: Eastham, J., Schaeffer, E. (eds) Radical Prostatectomy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8693-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8693-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8692-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8693-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)