Skip to main content

Challenging Cases in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Radical Prostatectomy

Abstract

Robotic surgeons are faced with an increasing array of complex clinical scenarios in the management of localized prostate cancer. With appropriate preparation and resource utilization, many of these “difficult cases” can be handled safely and efficiently. Securing obese patients adequately to the operating table and preventing port slippage is important in minimizing long case times and complications in these patients. In patients with large prostates, a well-developed posterior plane prior to bladder neck transection minimizes risk of injuring nearby structures. Use of a retraction suture or the fourth arm to elevate a median lobe can assist in patients with significant intravesical prostatic lobes. Bladder neck reconstruction may be necessary, and however be easily performed with lateral figure-of-eight stitches, which can also internalize the ureteral orifices. RARP can safely be performed in patients with prior bladder outlet, hernia, or multiple abdominal operations, although patients with prior TURP may have an increased risk of postoperative incontinence. An extended lymphadenectomy can be efficiently performed robotically, and increases prognostic and therapeutic yield of the operation without significantly increasing morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 10-K Annual report pursuant to section 13 and 15(d), filed on 2/1/11, filed period 12/31/10. http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=122359&p=irol-sec&secCat011_rs=1&secCat01.1_re-10

  3. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, et al. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA. 2002;288:1723–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, et al. Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1625–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Amling CL, Riffenburgh RH, Sun L, et al. Pathologic variables and recurrence rates as related to obesity and race in men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:439–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. MacInnis RJ, English DR. Body size and composition and prostate cancer risk: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Cancer Causes Control. 2006;17:989–1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Capitanio U, Suardi N, Briganti A, et al. Influence of obesity on tumour volume in patients with prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2012;109:678–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Campeggi A, Xylinas E, Ploussard G, et al. Impact of body mass index on perioperative morbidity, oncological, and functional outcomes after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2012;80:576–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wiltz AL, Shikanov S, Eggener SE, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes. Urology. 2009;73(2):316–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Castle EP, Atug F, Woods M, et al. Impact of body mass index on outcomes after robot assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2008;26(1):91–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Edwards R, et al. Impact of obesity on clinical outcomes in robotic prostatectomy. Urology. 2005;65(4):740–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan RC, Barocas DA, Chang SS, et al. Effect of a large prostate gland on open and robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2008;101(9):1140–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang AC, Kowalczyk KJ, Hevelone ND, et al. The impact of prostate size, median lobe, and prior benign prostatic hyperplasia intervention on robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: technique and outcomes. Eur Urol. 2011;59(4):595–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zorn KC, Orvieto MA, Mikhail AA, et al. Effect of prostate weight on operative and postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology. 2007;69(2):300–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Link BA, Nelson R, Josephson DY, et al. The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;180(3):928–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rehman J, Chughtai B, Guru K, et al. Management of an enlarged median lobe with ureteral orifices at the margin of the bladder neck during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Can J Urol. 2009;16:4490–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Guglielmetti GB, et al. Does the presence of median lobe affect outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy? J Endourol. 2012;26(3):264–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Meeks JJ, Zhao L, Greco KA, et al. Impact of prostate median lobe anatomy on robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology. 2009;73(2):323–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gupta NP, Singh P, Nayyar R, et al. Outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with previous transurethral resection of the prostate. BJU Int. 2011;108(9):1501–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jaffe J, Stakhovsky O, Cathelineau X, et al. Surgical outcomes for men undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol. 2007;178:483–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Katz R, Borkowski T, Hoznek A, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients following transurethral resection of the prostate. Urol Int. 2006;77:216–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Erdogru T, Teber D, Frede T, et al. The effect of previous transperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy on transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005;173(3):769–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Laungani RG, Kaul S, Muhletaler F, et al. Impact of previous inguinal hernia repair on transperitoneal robotic prostatectomy. Can J Urol. 2007;14(4):3635–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hiafler M, Benjamin B, Ghinea R, et al. The impact of previous laparoscopic hernia repair on radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2012;26(11):1458–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim W, Abdelshehid C, Lee HJ, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in umbilical hernia patients: University of California, Irvine, technique for port placement and repair. Urology. 2012;79(6):1412–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Siddiqui SA, Krane LS, Bhandari A. The impact of previous inguinal or abdominal surgery on outcomes after robotic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2010;75(5):1079–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Atug F, Castle EP, Woods M, et al. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: is one better than the other? Urology. 2006;68(5):1077–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Horstmann M, Vollmer C, Schwab C, et al. Single-centre evaluation of the extraperitoneal and transperitoneal approach in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2012;46(2):117–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Boylu U, Oommen M, Raynor M, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients with previous abdominal surgery: a novel laparoscopic adhesiolysis technique. J Endourol. 2010;24(2):229–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Joslyn SA, Konety BR. Impact of extent of lymphadenectomy on survival after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Urology. 2006;68:121–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hyndman ME, Mullins JK, Pavlovich CP. Pelvic node dissection in prostate cancer: extended, limited, or not at all? Curr Opin Urol. 2010;20(3):211–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yuh BE, Ruel NH, Mejia R, et al. Standardized comparison of robot-assisted limited and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2013;112(1):81–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gautam Jayram M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jayram, G., Allaf, M.E. (2014). Challenging Cases in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy. In: Eastham, J., Schaeffer, E. (eds) Radical Prostatectomy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8693-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8693-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8692-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8693-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics