Abstract
The PD theory provides deformation, as well as damage initiation and growth, without resorting to external criteria since material failure is invoked in the material response. However, it is computationally more demanding compared to the finite element method. Furthermore, the finite element method is very effective for modeling problems without damage. Hence, it is desirable to couple the PD theory and FEM to take advantage of their salient features if the regions of potential failure sites are identified prior to the analysis. Then, the regions in which failure is expected can be modeled by using the PD theory and the rest can be analyzed by using FEM.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agwai A, Guven I, Madenci E (2012) Drop-shock failure prediction in electronic packages by using peridynamic theory. IEEE Trans Adv Packag 2(3):439–447
Belytschko T (1983) An overview of semidiscretization and time integration procedures. Comput Meth Trans Anal 1:1–65
Kilic B, Madenci E (2010) Coupling of peridynamic theory and finite element method. J Mech Mater Struct 5:707–733
Lall P, Shantaram S, Panchagade D (2010) Peridynamic-models using finite elements for shock and vibration reliability of leadfree electronics. In: Proceedings of the 12th intersociety conference, thermal and thermomechanical phenomena in electronic systems (ITHERM), Las Vegas. IEEE, Piscataway, p 859, 2–5 June 2010
Liu W, Hong J (2012) A coupling approach of discretized peridynamics with finite element method. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 245–246:163–175
Lubineau G, Azdoud Y, Han F, Rey C, Askari A (2012) A morphing strategy to couple non-local to local continuum mechanics. J Mech Phys Solids 60:1088–1102
Macek RW, Silling SA (2007) Peridynamics via finite element analysis. Finite Elem Anal Des 43(15):1169–1178
Oterkus E, Madenci E, Weckner O, Silling S, Bogert P, Tessler A (2012) Combined finite element and peridynamic analyses for predicting failure in a stiffened composite curved panel with a central slot. Comp Struct 94:839–850
Seleson P, Beneddine S, Prudhomme S (2013) A force-based coupling scheme for peridynamics and classical elasticity. Comput Mater Sci. 66:34–49
Underwood P (1983) Dynamic relaxation. Comput Meth Trans Anal 1:245–265
Zienkiewicz OC (1977) The finite element method. McGraw-Hill, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Madenci, E., Oterkus, E. (2014). Coupling of the Peridynamic Theory and Finite Element Method. In: Peridynamic Theory and Its Applications. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8465-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8465-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8464-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8465-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)