Skip to main content

Creativity and Innovation Inside PSEO: A Contemporary Image

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Government e-Strategic Planning and Management

Abstract

Worldwide, management systems invest strongly on the concepts of innovation and creativity, two pillars necessary for the advancement of any modern economy. These two concepts play a strategic role in the evolution of any organization, defining its competitive advantages and thus securing its future survival. Here, in this chapter, we examine them in the light of the public sector and especially in the area of educational organizations management. We investigate under which circumstances they emerge, how they flourish or fail, and what impact they have on the daily operations of a PSEO. These concepts are dynamic, so the corresponding phenomena are discussed using analytical as well as discrete methodologies. We focus our attention on policies and strategies developed by the public sector, in the frame of e-government initiatives, so as to prepare the organizations for competition in the digital future. Finally, we propose a methodology appropriate for transforming a typical conservative PSEO into a modern, innovation-endorsing, and sustainable business model. It is important to aim at and describe in detail a step-by-step process that leads smoothly to the new situation, avoiding incongruities and disruptions. This is depicted in a roadmap sketched using the basic concepts embedded on a transition diagram. The work ends by wrapping up a psychological profile appropriate to cultivate to all PSEO stakeholders, in order to manage to administer changes of this magnitude and importance.

Acronym for “Public Sector Educational Organization”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Small land features, isolated by water, lying off the shore of a larger island (http://en.wikipedia.org).

  2. 2.

    Visit url http://broadband.cti.gr/en/index.php.

  3. 3.

    More information on url http://www.studioschoolstrust.org.

References

  • Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Connected: the surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. New York: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cointet, J., & Roth, C. (2007). How realistic should knowledge diffusion models be? Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 10, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F., & Aravind, D. (2012). Organizational structure and innovation revisited. In M. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 483–515). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Delre, S., Jager, W., Bijmolt, H. A., & Janssen, M. (2010). Will it spread or not? the effects of social influences and network topology on innovation diffusion. Journal of Product Innovation, 27, 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC Report (2009). The smart guide to innovation-based incubators. Publication Office of the EU.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Report (2010). EU Budget 2009: Financial Report. Publication Office of the EU. http://ec.europa.eu/budget/index.htm. Accessed 12 Sept 2012.

  • Gowan, J. C. (1972). The development of the creative individual. San Diego: Knapp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. (2002). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology (JSTOR), 83, 340–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, A. & Arbaugh, J. B. (2010). Seeking feedback in blended learning: competitive versus cooperative student attitudes and their links to learning outcome. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. Wiley Online Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen: the key to Japan’s competitive success. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Research Centre (JRC)—Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. (2009). Innovation and Creativity in Education and Training in the EU Member States. Office for Official Publications of the EU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khasawneh, B.S. (2008). Entrepreneurship promotion at educational institutions: a model suitable for emerging economies. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ko, R. (2009). A computer scientist’s guide to business process management. ACM Crossroads, 15(4), 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassen, K. B., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2009). Complexity metrics for workflow nets. Information and Software Technology, 51, 610–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H., & Papadimitriou, C. (1981). Elements of the theory of computation. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mashayek, F., Ashgriz, N., Minkowycz, W. J., & Shotorban, B. (2002). Coalescence collision of liquid drops. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 46, 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muketa, G. M., Ghani, A. A. A., Selamat, S. H., & Atan, R. (2010). A survey of business process complexity metrics. Information Technology Journal, 9(7), 1336–1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the public sector. Strategy Unit Cabinet Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011). Education at a Glance 2011, OECD indicators. http://www.oecd.org/education/highereducationandadultlearning/48631582.pdf. Accessed 18 Sept 2012.

  • Penuel, W., Riet, M., Joshi, A., Pearlman, L., & Chong, M. K. (2010). The alignment of the informal and formal organizational supports for reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 2010(46), 57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusions of innovation. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity: theories and themes: research, development, and practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Firestien, R. L. (1983). Theoretical perspectives on creative learning and its facilita-tion. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 17, 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente, T. (1996). Network models for the diffusion of innovations. Computational & Mathematical Organizational Theory, 2(2), 163–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. (1999). Consilience, the unity of knowledge. New York: Vintage Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windrum, P., & Koch, P. (2008). Innovation in public sector services. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantinos Zacharis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zacharis, K., Ipsilandis, P.G., O’Kane, J. (2014). Creativity and Innovation Inside PSEO: A Contemporary Image. In: Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C. (eds) Government e-Strategic Planning and Management. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 3. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8462-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics