Abstract
Glaucoma laser surgery was initially intended and practiced as a less invasive modification of standard filtration surgery. Pulsed and continuous-wave (CW) laser beams were used to create new outflow paths to lower the intra ocular pressure (IOP). The patency of laser-made openings proved short lasting, but the realization that the reduction of IOP persisted long after their failure prompted the investigation of new techniques and protocols. Lasers were used to produce shrinking burns in the trabecular meshwork (laser trabeculoplasty or LT), to stretch or perforate the iris (laser iridoplasty or laser iridotomy), and to replace diathermy and cryotherapy in cyclodestructive procedures to reduce the production of aqueous humor (laser cyclophotocoagulation or CPC). Treatment endpoint of all laser surgeries was always a discernable photothermal, photoacoustic, or photomechanical tissue effect, such as stretching, blanching, burning, bubbling, popping, perforating, or cutting. Although destructive in nature, the iatrogenic damage and collateral effects associated with these endpoints have been universally accepted as necessary for a useful treatment. Lately, almost by serendipity, it has been found that some procedures result equally effective and more beneficial when performed without destructive endpoint, by eliciting similar mechanisms of action with fewer or no collateral effects. This chapter will briefly review past and current glaucoma laser-surgery procedures and discuss new laser technologies that allow performing novel subthreshold laser-therapy treatments with no discernable tissue reaction endpoint.
Effective subthreshold laser therapies, with less or no iatrogenic damage, can be administered pro re nata (PRN) and play an important complementary role with emerging microinvasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) in the long-term management of glaucoma.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Krasnov MM. Laseropuncture of the anterior chamber angle in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1973;75:674–8.
Hager H. Besondere mikrochirurgische Eingriffe. II. Erste Erfahrungen mit dem Argon-Laser-Gerat 800. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1973;162:437–50.
Worthen DM, Wickam MG. Argon laser trabeculotomy. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1974;78:OP371–5.
Wickam MG, Worthen DM. Argon laser trabeculotomy: long-term follow-up. Ophthalmology. 1979;86:495–503.
Wise JB, Witter SL. Argon laser therapy for open-angle glaucoma. A pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97:319–22.
Gaasterland D, Kupfer C. Experimental glaucoma in the rhesus monkey. Invest Ophthalmol. 1975;14:455.
Ticho U, Zauberman H. Argon laser application to angle structures in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1976;94:61–4.
Ticho U, Cadet JC, Mahler J, et al. Argon laser trabeculotomies in primates: evaluation by histological and perfusion studies. Invest Ophthalmol. 1978;17:667–74.
Ticho U. Laser applications to the angle structures in animal and in the human glaucomatous eye. Adv Ophthalmol. 1977;34:201.
Glaucoma Laser Trial Research Group. The Glaucoma Laser Trial (GLT) and glaucoma laser trial follow-up study: 7. Results. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120:718–31.
Musch DC, et al., for the CIGTS Study Group. The collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study. Study design, methods, and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:653–62.
Lichter PR, et al., for the CIGTS Study Group. Interim clinical outcomes in the collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1943–53.
Heijl A, et al., for the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression. Results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1268–79.
Leske MC, et al., for the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Factors for glaucoma progression and effect of treatment. The Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:48–56.
Ederer F, Gaasterland DA, Dally LG, Kim J, VanVeldhuisen PC, Blackwell B, Prum B, Shafranov G, Allen RC, Beck A, AGIS Investigators. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study 13. Comparison of treatment outcomes within race 10 years results. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(4):651–64.
Shigleton BJ, Richter CU, Dharma SK, et al. Long-term efficacy of argon laser trabeculoplasty. A 10-year follow-up study. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:1324–9.
Rachmiel R, Trope GE, Chipman ML, et al. Laser trabeculoplasty trends with the introduction of new medical treatments and selective laser trabeculoplasty. J Glaucoma. 2006;15(4):306–9.
American Academy of Ophthalmology. Committee on Ophthalmic Procedures Assessment. Laser trabeculoplasty for primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(10):1706–12.
Park CH, Latina MA, Schuman JS. Developments in laser trabeculoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2000;30(4):315–22.
Olivier MMG. Glaucoma laser treatment: where are we now? Tech Ophthalmol. 2004;2(3):118–23.
Fea AM, Bosone A, Rolle T, et al. Micropulse diode laser trabeculoplasty (MDLT): a phase II clinical study with 12 months follow-up. Clin Ophthalmol. 2008;2(2):247–52.
Ingvoldstad DD, Krishna R, Willoughby L. Micropulse diode laser trabeculoplasty versus argon laser trabeculoplasty in the treatment of open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci. 2005;46:ARVO E-Abstract 123.
Fea AM, Dorin G. Laser treatment of glaucoma: evolution of laser trabeculoplasty techniques. Tech Ophthalmol. 2008;6(2):45–52.
Goldenfeld M, Melamed S, Simon G, Ben Simon GJ. Titanium:sapphire laser trabeculoplasty versus argon laser trabeculoplasty in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2009;40:264–9.
Gaasterland DE. Diode laser cyclophotocoagulation. Technique and results. Glaucoma Today. 2009;7(2):35–8.
Wilensky JT, Krammer J. Long-term visual outcome with transscleral laser cyclotherapy in eyes with ambulatory vision. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1389–92.
Ansari E, Gandhewar J. Long-term efficacy and visual acuity following transscleral diode laser photocoagulation in cases of refractory and non-refractory glaucoma. Eye. 2007;21(7):936–40.
Gedde SJ, Sciffman JC, Feuer WJ, et al. Three-year follow-up of the tube versus trabeculectomy study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(5):670–84.
Tan AM, Chockalingam M, Aquino MC, et al. Micropulse transscleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in the treatment of refractory glaucoma. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2010;38:266–72.
Aquino MC, Tan AW, Xiang L, et al. Micropulse versus continuous wave transscleral diode cyclophotocoagulation in the treatment of refractory glaucoma: a randomized comparison trial. (submitted for publication).
Liu GJ, Mizukawa A, Okisada S. Mechanism of intraocular pressure decrease after contact transscleral continuous-wave Nd:YAG laser cyclophotocoagulation. Ophthalmic Res. 1994;26(2):65–79.
Ho CL, Wong EYM, Chew PTK. Effect of diode laser contact transscleral pars plana photocoagulation on intraocular pressure in glaucoma. Clin Exper Ophthalmol. 2002;30:343–7.
Ho CL. Micropulse diode transscleral cyclophotocoagulation. Asian J Ophthalmol. 2002; nos 3,4, 2001 Supplement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dorin, G. (2014). New Laser Technologies. In: Samples, J.R., Ahmed, I.I.K. (eds) Surgical Innovations in Glaucoma. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8348-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8348-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8347-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8348-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)