Abstract
This chapter “defamiliarizes” us with socially imposed universal monogamy by focusing on its most heinous facet: its depriving innocent out-of-wedlock children of normal birth-status rights. The context is France in the 19th century and earlier. Before the revolution of 1789, a non-marital child was a bastard who, by virtue of the law, belonged to no family and could inherit from neither of his two progenitors nor their respective relatives. Canon law prohibited any such child to enter into a church career. After 1793, the bastard became legally known as a natural or illegitimate child. He was then defined as related to his mother and father, but not to his parents’ relatives. He could inherit only from his parents (never from their relatives) and only a reduced portion. The case of an adulterine natural child was far worse. A married man was prohibited by law to make any attempt at acknowledging his child with a mistress. If we define, as British anthropologists do, a marriage as an intimate conjunction providing its resulting progeny with full birth-status rights, then, at that time, no concubinal relationship could be regarded as a marriage of any sort, common law or otherwise. In consequence, no pluri-concubinage and no wife-plus-mistress understandings could be actual forms of polygamy. The chapter ends with the question of the ethics of universal monogamy if its enforcement requires that year after year many innocent children be relegated for life to true social pariah conditions. The next chapter examines what happened when illegitimate children were granted full birth-status rights.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Some of the notions contained in the civil code do not exist in English-speaking countries, most of which use the common law system. The translated terms in our essay are either borrowed from other authors or simply suggestions.
- 2.
See “De la Bâtardise”. In Dictionnaire de Droit et de Pratique par M. Claude-Joseph de Ferrière, doyen des docteurs-régens en la Faculté des droits de Paris, et ancien avocat au Parlement, 2 tomes, Paris: chez Savoye, 1762. Extract quoted in Livre des sources médiévales at: http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/french/batard.htm (retrieved Dec. 16, 2008).
- 3.
A career in the Church was possible for a bastard only if a papal dispensation was granted. Such cases were very rare. See “Bastardy,” Encyclopedia of Children and Childhood in History and Society. http://www.faqs.org/childhood/Ar-Bo/Bastardy.html (retrieved Dec. 3, 2011).
- 4.
The complete Roman phrase is: Mater semper certa; pater est quem nuptiae demonstrant (The [identity of the] mother is always certain; the father is whom the marriage vows indicate).
- 5.
“De la Bâtardise”, ibid.
- 6.
See “Is Polygamy Illegal?” In Polygamy—Frequently Asked Questions. At http://www.absalom.com/mormon/polygamy/faq.htm (retrieved Jan. 20, 2009).
- 7.
References
Beckert, J. (2008). Inherited Wealth (trans: Dunlap, T.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ferrière, C.-J. de (1762). Dictionnaire de Droit et de Pratique. Paris: chez Savoye, 2 tomes.
Fustel de Coulanges, N. D. (1956). The ancient city: A study on the religion, laws, and institutions of Greece and Rome. Garden City: Doubleday Anchor Books A76 [original 1864].
Gough, K. E. (1959). The Nayars and the definition of marriage. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 89, 23–34.
Krause, H. D. (1976). Creation of relationships of kinship. In A. Chloros (Ed.), Person and family. In International encyclopedia of comparative law, eds. Zweigert and Drobnig, Vol. 4, (pp. 1–101). The Hague and Tubingen: Mouton and Mohr.
Maillu, D. G. (1988). Our kind of polygamy. Nairobi: Heineman Kenya.
Sohn, A.-M. (2006). Concubinage et illégitimité. Revised web version of concubinage and illegitimacy. In Encyclopedia of European social history, Vol. 4, (pp. 259–267), 2001.Footnote
Sohn at http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/08/58/42/PDF/Concubinage.pdf
Weill, A., & Terré, F. (1983). Droit civil: Les personnes, la famille, les incapacités (Jurisprudence Générale Dalloz). Paris: Dalloz.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Legros, D. (2014). Anthropologizing Traditional Marriage in France. In: Mainstream Polygamy. SpringerBriefs in Anthropology(), vol 2. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8307-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8307-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8306-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8307-6
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)