Skip to main content

The Teaching of Mathematics Using APOS Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
APOS Theory

Abstract

This chapter is a discussion of the design and implementation of instruction using APOS Theory. For a particular mathematical concept, this typically begins with a genetic decomposition, a description of the mental constructions an individual might make in coming to understand the concept (see Chap. 4 for more details). Implementation is usually carried out using the ACE Teaching Cycle, an instructional approach that supports development of the mental constructions called for by the genetic decomposition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Preservice refers to college or university students who are preparing to become school teachers.

  2. 2.

    The notation Line # does not actually appear on an ISETL screen. It is being used for convenience here and in other examples with longer lines of code.

  3. 3.

    The application of Actions to physical (real world) Objects is considered in detail in Chap. 9.

  4. 4.

    In Dubinsky et al. (2005a, b), the ability to see a Process as a Totality was considered to be a part of encapsulation. The instruction on which the study was based (Weller et al. 2009, 2011; Dubinsky et al. 2013) showed evidence of Totality as a separate stage between Process and Object. This distinction is considered later in this chapter and explored in depth in Chap. 8.

  5. 5.

    In these discussions, decimal expansions are referred to as strings. This means finite or infinite sequences of digits that correspond to the decimal expansion of a rational number.

  6. 6.

    ISETL recognized decimal expansions using the notation a.b(c). Here a, b, and c are nonnegative integers, where a denotes the integer part of the decimal expansion, b the decimal portion that appears before the repeating cycle, and c the repeating cycle. For repeating digits such as \( 0.{\bar{3}} \) and \( 0.{\overline{35}} \), where the cycle begins in the tenths place, the computer recognized the notation 0.3(3) and 0.3(53), respectively.

  7. 7.

    The preloaded mystery strings were denoted m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7, and m8.

  8. 8.

    Because positions \( n = -3, - 4, - 5\ {\rm are}\ 0 \), they do not appear, according to convention.

References

  • Asiala, M., Brown, A., DeVries, D., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D., & Thomas, K. (1996). A framework for research and curriculum development in undergraduate mathematics education. In Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education II. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education (Vol. 6, pp. 1–32). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A., DeVries, D., Dubinsky, E., & Thomas, K. (1997). Learning binary operations, groups, and subgroups. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16, 187–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornu, B. (1991). Limits. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 153–166). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Nichols, D., Schwingendorf, K., Thomas, K., & Vidaković, D. (1996). Understanding the limit concept: Beginning with a coordinated process schema. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 167–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dautermann, J. (1992). Using ISETL 3.0: A language for learning mathematics. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, E. (1995). ISETL: A programming language for learning mathematics. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 48, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, E., Dautermann, J., Leron, U., & Zazkis, R. (1994). On learning fundamental concepts of group theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 267–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, E., Weller, K., McDonald, M. A., & Brown, A. (2005a). Some historical issues and paradoxes regarding the concept of infinity: An APOS analysis: Part 1. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 335–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, E., Weller, K., McDonald, M. A., & Brown, A. (2005b). Some historical issues and paradoxes regarding the concept of infinity: An APOS analysis: Part 2. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sierpinska, A. (1987). Humanities students and epistemological obstacles related to limits. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18, 371–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D., & Schwarzenberger, R. (1978). Conflicts in the learning of real numbers and limits. Mathematics Teaching, 82, 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, K., Arnon, I., & Dubinsky, E. (2009). Preservice teachers’ understanding of the relation between a fraction or integer and its decimal expansion. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 9, 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, K., Arnon, I., & Dubinsky, E. (2011). Preservice teachers’ understanding of the relation between a fraction or integer and its decimal expansion: Strength and stability of belief. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 11, 129–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, K., Clark, J. M., Dubinsky, E., Loch, S., McDonald, M. A., & Merkovsky, R. (2003). Student performance and attitudes in courses based on APOS theory and the ACE teaching cycle. In Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education V. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education (Vol. 12, pp. 97–131). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. (1991). Models of limits held by college calculus students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 219–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. (2001). Predications of the limit concept: An application of repertory grids. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 341–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yopp, D. A., Burroughs, E. A., & Lindaman, B. J. (2011). Why it is important for in-service elementary mathematics teachers to understand the equality .999… = 1. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30, 304–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arnon, I. et al. (2014). The Teaching of Mathematics Using APOS Theory. In: APOS Theory. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7966-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics