Abstract
This chapter is a discussion of the design and implementation of instruction using APOS Theory. For a particular mathematical concept, this typically begins with a genetic decomposition, a description of the mental constructions an individual might make in coming to understand the concept (see Chap. 4 for more details). Implementation is usually carried out using the ACE Teaching Cycle, an instructional approach that supports development of the mental constructions called for by the genetic decomposition.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Preservice refers to college or university students who are preparing to become school teachers.
- 2.
The notation Line # does not actually appear on an ISETL screen. It is being used for convenience here and in other examples with longer lines of code.
- 3.
The application of Actions to physical (real world) Objects is considered in detail in Chap. 9.
- 4.
In Dubinsky et al. (2005a, b), the ability to see a Process as a Totality was considered to be a part of encapsulation. The instruction on which the study was based (Weller et al. 2009, 2011; Dubinsky et al. 2013) showed evidence of Totality as a separate stage between Process and Object. This distinction is considered later in this chapter and explored in depth in Chap. 8.
- 5.
In these discussions, decimal expansions are referred to as strings. This means finite or infinite sequences of digits that correspond to the decimal expansion of a rational number.
- 6.
ISETL recognized decimal expansions using the notation a.b(c). Here a, b, and c are nonnegative integers, where a denotes the integer part of the decimal expansion, b the decimal portion that appears before the repeating cycle, and c the repeating cycle. For repeating digits such as \( 0.{\bar{3}} \) and \( 0.{\overline{35}} \), where the cycle begins in the tenths place, the computer recognized the notation 0.3(3) and 0.3(53), respectively.
- 7.
The preloaded mystery strings were denoted m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, m6, m7, and m8.
- 8.
Because positions \( n = -3, - 4, - 5\ {\rm are}\ 0 \), they do not appear, according to convention.
References
Asiala, M., Brown, A., DeVries, D., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D., & Thomas, K. (1996). A framework for research and curriculum development in undergraduate mathematics education. In Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education II. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education (Vol. 6, pp. 1–32). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Brown, A., DeVries, D., Dubinsky, E., & Thomas, K. (1997). Learning binary operations, groups, and subgroups. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16, 187–239.
Cornu, B. (1991). Limits. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 153–166). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Nichols, D., Schwingendorf, K., Thomas, K., & Vidaković, D. (1996). Understanding the limit concept: Beginning with a coordinated process schema. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 167–192.
Dautermann, J. (1992). Using ISETL 3.0: A language for learning mathematics. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
Dubinsky, E. (1995). ISETL: A programming language for learning mathematics. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 48, 1–25.
Dubinsky, E., Dautermann, J., Leron, U., & Zazkis, R. (1994). On learning fundamental concepts of group theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 267–305.
Dubinsky, E., Weller, K., McDonald, M. A., & Brown, A. (2005a). Some historical issues and paradoxes regarding the concept of infinity: An APOS analysis: Part 1. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 335–359.
Dubinsky, E., Weller, K., McDonald, M. A., & Brown, A. (2005b). Some historical issues and paradoxes regarding the concept of infinity: An APOS analysis: Part 2. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 253–266.
Sierpinska, A. (1987). Humanities students and epistemological obstacles related to limits. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18, 371–397.
Tall, D., & Schwarzenberger, R. (1978). Conflicts in the learning of real numbers and limits. Mathematics Teaching, 82, 44–49.
Weller, K., Arnon, I., & Dubinsky, E. (2009). Preservice teachers’ understanding of the relation between a fraction or integer and its decimal expansion. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 9, 5–28.
Weller, K., Arnon, I., & Dubinsky, E. (2011). Preservice teachers’ understanding of the relation between a fraction or integer and its decimal expansion: Strength and stability of belief. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 11, 129–159.
Weller, K., Clark, J. M., Dubinsky, E., Loch, S., McDonald, M. A., & Merkovsky, R. (2003). Student performance and attitudes in courses based on APOS theory and the ACE teaching cycle. In Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education V. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education (Vol. 12, pp. 97–131). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Williams, S. (1991). Models of limits held by college calculus students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 219–236.
Williams, S. (2001). Predications of the limit concept: An application of repertory grids. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 341–367.
Yopp, D. A., Burroughs, E. A., & Lindaman, B. J. (2011). Why it is important for in-service elementary mathematics teachers to understand the equality .999… = 1. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30, 304–318.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arnon, I. et al. (2014). The Teaching of Mathematics Using APOS Theory. In: APOS Theory. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7966-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7966-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7965-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7966-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)