Skip to main content

The Public Policy Approach: Governments, Institutions, Welfare States and Social Justice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Handbook on Noncommunicable Diseases and Health Promotion

Abstract

The twentieth century was, for many reasons, the age of successful public policy making. With the firm establishment of the nation-state in a colonialised context of the nineteenth century, the welfare state in its many guises emerged in the last century of the second millennium. The successes of the welfare state, and as a corollary the success of public policy in preventing disease and promoting health, has been undeniable.

But the world is changing and so is the notion of public policy. Similar to a debate in public health (is it “the public’s health” or “public sector health?”) public policy has faced a need to transcend the boundaries of the nation-state. This was already the case in the infectious disease era (and the networked nature of the smallpox eradication effort serves as a beautiful example) but is even more so the case in the twenty-first century where the growth and pathology of NCDs are much more complex and less amenable to direct clinical intervention.

The welfare state, as a major accomplishment of the age of modernity, is struggling to cope with a new world order though. Multinational corporations often manage financial turnovers many times the national accounts of nation-states, and seek to engage in global policy development, including (impacts on) global health. Similarly, a renewed global civil society is challenging both industry interests and the illusion of state prerogatives in health policy development.

The lessons are that governments need to engage in exercises mapping the social, cultural and organisational contexts in which NCDs emerge and result in substantial differences in health outcomes. That their role has shifted from direct control and ownership of public health to that of a coordinator and mediator of roles in a networked health society. Public policy is still important—but it has become “the public’s policy” and less “public sector policy.” The chapter concludes with arguments for health promoters and policy makers how to re-align and reconfigure their ambitions to promoting health and preventing (NC)Disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Takeaway is a unique partnership of global news leaders. It is a co-production of PRI (Public Radio International) and WNYC Radio in collaboration with the BBC World Service, The New York Times and WGBH Boston.

References

  • Arts, W. A., & Gelissen, J. (2002). Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report. Journal of European Social Policy, 12(2), 137–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bambra, C. (2007). Going beyond the three worlds: regime theory and public health research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61, 1098–1102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bambra, C., & Beckfield, J. (2011). Institutional arrangements as candidate explanations for the US mortality disadvantage. Background paper for the NAS/IOM panel on Understanding International Health Differences in High-Income Countries. The National Academies/Institute of Medicine, Washington (scholar.harvard.edu/jbeckfield/files/bambra_and_beckfield_2012.pdf) last Accessed August 21, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. (2006). The smallpox eradication game. Public Choice, 130, 179–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, W. (1942). Social insurance and allied services. Report by Sir William Beveridge. New York, NY: The MacMillan Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birn, A. E. (2011). Small(pox) success? Erradicação da varíola: medida do sucesso? Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 16(2), 591–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonoli, G. (1997). Classifying welfare states: A two-dimension approach. Journal of Social Policy, 26(3), 351–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundage, A. (1988). England’s “Prussian” minister: Edwin Chadwick and the politics of government growth 1832 1854. University Park: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, E. (1993). Health policy, epidemiology and power: the interest web. Health Promotion International, 8(1), 49–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, E. (2009). Evidence for healthy cities: reflections on practice, method and theory. Health Promotion International, 24(S1), i19–i36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Tocqueville, A. (1835, 1840). Democracy in America. London: Penguin Classics. 2003 edition and translation.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVol, R. (2011). The eight Best innovation ideas from around the world. The Atlantic, http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/11/the-8-best-innovation-ideas-from-around-the-world/248695/ (last Accessed August 21, 2012)

  • Ferrera, M. (1993). Modelli di solidarietà. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, D. (1979). Review of William Beveridge: A biography by Jose Harris. The Historical Journal, 22(4), 1031–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geissler, J. (2011). Health policy in Germany: Consumer groups in a corporatist polity. Ch. 9. In H. Löfgren, E. DeLeeuw, & M. Leahy (Eds.), Democratising health: Consumer groups in the policy process. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gini, C. (1912). Variabilità e mutabilità. Tipografia di P: Cuppini, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, S. (2004). The communitarian “philosophy” of New Labour. In S. Hale, W. Leggett, & L. Martell (Eds.), The third Way and beyond. Criticisms, futures, alternatives (pp. 87–107). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1998). Cities in civilization. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ham, C. (2001). Values and health policy: The case of Singapore. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 26(4), 739–745.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamlin, C. (1998). Public health and social justice in the age of Chadwick: Britain 1800–1854. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2006). Analysing policy processes as multiple governance: Accountability in social policy. Policy & Politics, 34(3), 557–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, M. (2007). The institutionalization of the lifecourse: Looking back to look ahead. Research in Human Development, 4(3–4), 253–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehning, P. B. (2002). Rawls in The Netherlands. European Journal of Political Theory, 1(2), 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1989). Implementation and public policy. With a new postscript. Lan-ham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeown, T. (1976). The role of medicine—Dream, mirage or nemesis. London: Nuffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Najam, A. (1995). Learning from the literature on policy implementation: A synthesis perspective. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, V., Muntaner, C., Borrell, C., Benach, J., Quiroga, Á., Rodríguez-Sanz, M., et al. (2006). Politics and health outcomes. The Lancet, 368, 1033–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. J. D. (2009). The Politics of Professionalisation: MPs, Medical men, and the 1858 Medical Act. Medical History, 53, 37–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosero-Bixby, L., & Dow, W. H. (2009). Surprising SES gradients in mortality, health, and biomarkers in a Latin American population of adults. Journals of Gerontology Series B—Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64(1), 105–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosero-Bixby, L., Dow, W. H., & Laclé, A. (2005). Insurance and other socioeconomic determinants of elderly longevity in a Costa Rican panel. Journal of Biosocial Science, 37(6), 705–720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruger, J. P. (2006). Ethics of the social determinants of health. The Lancet, 364(9439), 1092–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. (2007). The need for better theories. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed., pp. 3–17). Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabel, C. E., Dorling, D., & Hiscock, R. (2007). Sources of income, wealth and the length of life: An individual level study of mortality. Critical Public Health, 17(4), 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titmuss, R. M. (1968). Essays on the welfare state. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend B., Martin E., Löfgren H., de Leeuw E. (2012). Global Health Governance: Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the Doha Declaration, and Democratisation. Administrative Sciences, 2(2), 186–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2008). Human development report 2007/2008: Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a divided world. New York: United Nations Development Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2000). Health systems: improving performance. World Health Report. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcock, A. (1993). A theory of the human need for occupation. Journal of Occupational Science: Australia, 1(1), 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, A. (1977). Doing better and feeling worse: The political pathology of health policy. Daedalus, 106(1), 105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2007). The problems of relative deprivation: Why some societies do better than others. Social Science & Medicine, 65(9), 1965–1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level. Why greater equality makes societies stronger. London: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winslow, C. E.-A. (1920). The untilled fields of public health. Science, 51(3106), 23–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization, Canadian Public Health Association & Health Canada. (1986). The Ottawa charter for health promotion. Health Promotion, 1(4), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evelyne de Leeuw .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Leeuw, E. (2013). The Public Policy Approach: Governments, Institutions, Welfare States and Social Justice. In: McQueen, D. (eds) Global Handbook on Noncommunicable Diseases and Health Promotion. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7594-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7594-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7593-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7594-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics