Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cognitive Readiness for Complex Team Performance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Teaching and Measuring Cognitive Readiness

Abstract

Researchers have recently begun to articulate factors associated with cognitive readiness. For the most part, these efforts have focused on individual performance. However, it is apparent that many modern tasks require workers to perform as part of a team. This may impose additional cognitive readiness demands. This chapter extends the work on cognitive readiness to the area of team performance. The authors describe a set of candidate skills that may indicate cognitive readiness for teamwork.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alavi, J., & McCormick, J. (2007). Measurement of vertical and horizontal idiocentrism and allocentrism in small groups. Small Group Research, 38(4), 556–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alavi, S. B., & McCormick, J. (2004). A cross-cultural analysis of the effectiveness of the learning organization model in school contexts. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(7), 408–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. P., & Salas, E. (1992). Principles for measuring teamwork skills. Human Factors, 34(4), 469–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, C., Hollenbeck, J., Wagner, D., DeRue, D., Nahrgang, J., & Schwind, K. (2008). Harmful help: The costs of backing-up behavior in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 529–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 377–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blickensderfer, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1998). Cross-training and team performance. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 299–311). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, C. A., Braun, C. C., & Morgan, B. B. (1997). Team workload: Its meaning and measurement. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 85–108). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, C. A., Jentsch, F., & Salas, E. (2000). Establishing aircrew competencies: A comprehensive approach for identifying CRM training needs. In H. F. O’Neil & D. H. Andrews (Eds.), Aircrew training methods and assessment (pp. 67–83). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, J., White, B. J., & Mennecke, B. E. (2003). Teams and tasks: A temporal framework for the effects of interpersonal interventions on team performance. Small Group Research, 34(3), 353–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20, 343–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, C., Stagl, K., Klein, C., Goodwin, G., Salas, E., & Halpin, S. (2006). What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 288–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. J., Weir, T., & Duncan, G. (1976). Informal helping relationships in work organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 19, 370–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Bowers, C. (2010). Team development and functioning. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 597–650). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Bowers, C. A., & Sanchez, A. (2008a). Using synthetic learning environments to train teams. In V. I. Sessa & M. London (Eds.), Work group learning: Understanding, improving and assessing how groups learn in organizations (pp. 315–346). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1998a). Team performance and training in complex environments: Recent findings from applied research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(3), 83–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. E. (1998b). Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training. American Psychological Association.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S., & Mathieu, J. (1995). Toward theoretically based principles of training effectiveness: A model and initial empirical investigation. Military Psychology, 7(3), 141–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C., Laerson, J. R., Jr., Abbott, A., Ardolino, A., Franz, T., & Pfeiffer, C. (2000). Decision making of clinical teams: Communication patterns and diagnostic error. Medical Decision Making, 20, 45–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crichton, M. (2005). Attitudes to teamwork, leadership, and stress in oil industry drilling teams. Safety Science, 43, 676–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas, H. M., Fiore, S. M., Bowers, C. A., & Salas, E. (2004). Fostering constructive cognitive and metacognitive activity in computer-based complex task training environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(2), 225–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeChurch, L., & Haas, C. (2008). Examining team planning through an episodic lens: Effects of deliberate, contingency, and reactive planning on team effectiveness. Small Group Research, 39(5), 542–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driskell, J. E., & Salas, E. (1997). Collective behavior and team performance. In D. F. Russ-Eft, H. S. Preskill, C. Sleezer, D. F. Russ-Eft, H. S. Preskill, & C. Sleezer (Eds.), Human resource development review: Research and implications (pp. 206–222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A., Bell, B., Ployhart, R., Ilgen, D., & Hollenbeck, J. (2005). An evaluation of generic teamwork skills training with action teams: Effects on cognitive and skill-based outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 58(3), 641–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flin, R., Fletcher, G., McGeorge, P., Sutherland, A., & Patey, R. (2003). Anaesthetists’ attitudes to teamwork and safety. Anaesthesia, 58, 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flin, R., O’Connor, P., & Mearns, K. (2002). Crew resource management. Improving teamwork in high reliability industries. Team Performance Management, 8, 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foushee, H. C. (1984). Dyads and triads at 35,000 feet. Factors affecting group process and aircrew performance. American Psychologist, 38, 885–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowlkes, J., Lane, N., Salas, E., Franz, T., & Oser, R. (1994). Improving the measurement of team performance: The targets methodology. Military Psychology, 6(1), 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregorich, S., Helmreich, R., & Wilhelm, J. (1990). The structure of cockpit management attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 682–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grogan, E. L., Stiles, R. A., France, D. J., Speroff, T., Morris, J. A., Nixon, B., et al. (2004). The impact of aviation-based teamwork training on the attitudes of health-care professionals. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 199(6), 843–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, R., & Dickson, M. (1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). When and how team leaders matter. In B. Staw & R. Moreland (Eds.), Research in organization behavior (Vol. 26). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, T. E., & Sherblom, J. C. (2002). Small group and team communication. New York: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, R. (1984). Cockpit management attitudes. Human Factors, 26(5), 583–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, R., & Merritt, A. C. (1998). Culture at work in aviation and medicine. National, organizational and professional influences. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, R., Sexton, J. B., & Merritt, A. C. (1997). The operating room management attitudes questionnaire (ORMAQ) (University of Texas Aerospace Crew Research Project Technical Report 97-6). Austin, TX: University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, R. L., & Foushee, H. C. (1993). Why crew resource management? Empirical and theoretical bases of human factors training in aviation. In E. L. Wiener, B. G. Kanki, & R. L. Helmreich (Eds.), Cockpit resource management. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, G., Konradt, U., & Voss, K. (2006). Competencies for virtual teamwork: Development and validation of a web-based selection tool for members of distributed teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(4), 477–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfeld, R., Jordan, M., Feild, H., Giles, W., & Armenakis, A. (2006). Becoming team players: Team members’ mastery of teamwork knowledge as a predictor of team task proficiency and observed teamwork effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 467–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollenbeck, J. R., DeRue, D., & Guzzo, R. (2004). Bridging the gap between I/O research and HR practice: Improving team composition, team training, and team task design. Human Resource Management, 43(4), 353–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jentsch, F., Barnett, J., Bowers, C. A., & Salas, E. (1999). Who is flying this plane anyway? What mishaps tell us about crew member role assignment and air crew situation awareness. Human Factors, 41(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1996). Team leadership and development: Theory, principles, and guidelines for training leaders and teams. In M. Beyerlein, S. Beyerlein, & D. Johnson (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams (pp. 253–292). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassiter, D. L., Vaughn, J. S., Smaltz, V. E., Morgan, B. B., & Salas, E. (1990). A comparison of two types of training interventions on team communication performance. In D. Woods & E. Roth (Eds.), Proceedings of the human factors society 34th annual meeting (pp. 1372–1376). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • LePine, J. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., & Hedlund, J. (1997). Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams: Much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 803–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, L., Espin, S., Whyte, S., Regehr, G., Baker, G., Reznick, R., et al. (2004). Communication failures in the operating room: An observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 13(5), 330–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, J., Entin, E., & Serfaty, D. (2004). Communication overhead: The hidden cost of team cognition. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 61–82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, M. A., Sabella, M. J., Burke, C., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2002). The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, M., Zaccaro, S., & Mathieu, J. (2000). Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 971–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J., & Shulze, W. (2006). The influence of team knowledge and formal plans on episodic team process-performance relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 605–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, M. T., Mathieu, J., Marsh, W., & Ruddy, T. (2007). A multilevel investigation of the influences of employees’ resistance to empowerment. Human Performance, 20, 147–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClough, A. C., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2003). Selection in teams: An exploration of the teamwork knowledge, skills, and ability test. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(1), 56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesmer-Magnus, J., & DeChurch, L. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 535–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. L. (2001). Reexamining teamwork KSAs and team performance. Small Group Research, 32(6), 745–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohrman, S. A., & Cohen, S. G. (1995). When people get out of the box: New relationships, new systems. In A. Howard (Ed.), The changing nature of work (pp. 365–410). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, J. C., Simon, R., Jay, G. D., Wears, R. L., Salisbury, M., Dukes, K. A., et al. (2002). Error reduction and performance improvement in the emergency department through formal teamwork training: Evaluation results of the MedTeams project. Health Services Research, 37(6), 1553–1581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, B., Salas, E., & Glickman, A. (1993). An analysis of team evolution and maturation. The Journal of General Psychology, 120(3), 277–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson, F., Reider, M., & Campion, M. (2005). Selecting individuals in team settings: The importance of social skills, personality characteristics, and teamwork knowledge. Personnel Psychology, 58(3), 583–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, J., & Fletcher, J. D. (2002). Cognitive readiness (IDA Paper P-3735). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, T. V., Van Iddekinge, C. H., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2008). The team role test: Development and validation of a team role knowledge situational judgment test. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 250–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P., & Flin, R. (2003). Crew resource management training for offshore oil production teams. Safety Science, 41, 591–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Daniel, M., & Rosenstein, A. (2008). Professional communication and team coordination. In R. Hughes (Ed.), Patient safety and quality. Washington, DC: AHRQ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oser, R. L., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Dwyer, D. J. (1999). Enhancing human performance in technology-rich environments: Guidelines for scenario-based training. In E. Salas (Ed.), Human/technology interaction in complex systems (pp. 175–202). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, C., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. (2000). Teamwork in multi-person systems: A review and analysis. Ergonomics, 43(8), 1052–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrashkova-Volzdoska, R., McComb, S., Green, S., & Compton, W. (2003). Examining a curvilinear relationship between communication frequency and team performance in cross-functional project teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(3), 262–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ployhart, R., & Bliese, P. (2006). I-ADAPT theory: Conceptualizing the antecedents, consequences, and measurement of individual differences in adaptability. In E. Salas (Ed.), Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research. Bingley, UK: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, C. (2005). Goal orientation: Effects on backing up behavior, performance, efficacy, and commitment in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 811–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, C., Hollenbeck, J., Ilgen, D., Ellis, A., West, B., & Moon, H. (2003). Backing up behaviors in teams: The role of personality and legitimacy of need. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 391–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prichard, J. S., Bizo, L. A., & Stratford, R. J. (2006). The educational impact of team-skills training: Preparing students to work in groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, C., & Salas, E. (1993). Training and research for teamwork in the military aircrew. In E. L. Wiener, B. G. Kanki, & R. L. Helmreich (Eds.), Cockpit resource management (pp. 337–366). Orlando, FL: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulakos, E., Arad, S., Donovan, M., & Plamondon, K. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulakos, E., Dorsey, D., & White, S. (2006). Adaptability in the workplace: Selecting an adaptive workforce. In C. S. Burke, L. G. Pierce, & E. Salas (Eds.), Understanding adaptability: A prerequisite for effective performance within complex environments (pp. 41–71). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., & Bowers, C. A. (2000). The design and delivery of crew resource management training: Exploiting available resources. Human Factors, 42(3), 490–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Johnston, J. (1997). How can you turn a team of experts into an expert team?: Emerging training strategies. In C. E. Zsambok, G. Klein, C. E. Zsambok, & G. Klein (Eds.), Naturalistic decision making (pp. 359–370). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., Fowlkes, J., Stout, R., Milanovich, D., & Prince, C. (1999). Does CRM training improve teamwork skills in the cockpit? Two evaluation studies. Human Factors, 41(2), 326–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., Prince, C., Bowers, C., Stout, R., Oser, R., & Cannon-Bowers, J. (1999). A methodology for enhancing crew resource management training. Human Factors, 41(1), 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., Rozell, D., Mullen, B., & Driskell, J. E. (1999). The effect of team building on performance: An integration. Small Group Research, 30(3), 309–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saus, E.-R., Johnsen, B. H., Eid, J., Riisem, P. K., Andersen, R., & Thayer, J. F. (2006). The effect of brief situational awareness training in a police shooting simulator: An experimental study. Military Psychology, 18(Suppl), S3–S21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatz, S., Bowers, C., & Nicholson, D. (2009). Advanced situated tutors: Design, philosophy, and a review of existing systems. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica, CA: HFES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Salas, E. (2008). Guided team self-correction: Impacts on team mental models, processes, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 39(3), 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Salas, E., & Baker, D. P. (1996). Training team performance-related assertiveness. Personnel Psychology, 49(4), 909–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stajkovic, A. D., Lee, D., & Nyberg, A. J. (2009). Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: Meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 814–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. (1997). Teamwork-KSA test: Examiners manual. Rosemont, IL: McGraw-Hill/London House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. (1999). Staffing work teams: Development and validation of a selection test for teamwork settings. Journal of Management, 25(2), 207–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G. (2006). A meta-analytic review of the relationship among team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32, 29–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, R., & Bailey, J. (2007). Team conflict self-efficacy and outcome expectancy of business students. The Journal of Education for Business, 82, 56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stout, R. J., Driskell, J. E., & Salas, E. (1997). Collective orientation and team performance. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 1190–1194). Santa Monica, CA: HFES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strater, L., & Bolstad, C. (2008). Simulation-based situation awareness training. In D. Vincenzi (Ed.), Human factors in simulation and training. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, J., & Andersson, J. (2006). Speech acts, communication problems, and fighter pilot team performance. Ergonomics, 49(12/13), 1226–1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, S. I., Smith-Jentsch, K. A., & Behson, S. J. (1998). Training team leaders to facilitate team learning and performance. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 247–270). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, J., Bowers, C., Monday, S., & Morgan, B. (1995). Workload, team structure, and communication in team performance. Military Psychology, 7(2), 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallin, C.-J., Meurling, L., Hedman, L., HedegÃ¥rd, J., & Felländer-Tsai, L. (2007). Target-focused medical emergency team training using a human patient simulator: Effects on behaviour and attitude. Medical Education, 41(2), 173–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wears, R. L., Perry, S. J., Shapiro, M., Beach, C., Croskerry, P., & Behara, R. (2003). Shift changes among emergency physicians: Best of times, worst of times. In Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 1420–1423). Santa Monica, CA: HFES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, S., Rosen, M., DiazGranados, D., Lazarra, E., Lyons, R., Salas, E., et al. (2010). Does teamwork improve performance in the operating room? A multilevel evaluation. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 36, 133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yedidia, M. J., Gillespie, C. C., Kachur, E., Schwartz, M. D., Ockene, J., Chepaitis, A. E., et al. (2003). Effect of communications training on medical student performance. Journal of the American Medical Association, 290(9), 1157–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work reported herein was partially supported by a grant from the Office of Naval Research, Award Number N00014-08-1-0126. The findings and opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect the positions or policies of the Office of Naval Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, 4000 Central Florida Boulevard, Orlando, FL, 32816-1390, USA

    Clint Bowers

  2. Institute for Simulation & Training, University of Central Florida, 3100 Technology Parkway, Orlando, FL, 32826, USA

    Janis Cannon-Bowers

Authors
  1. Clint Bowers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Janis Cannon-Bowers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clint Bowers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , National Center for Research on Evaluati, University of Southern California, Longbow Drive 15366, Los Angeles, 91403, California, USA

    Harold F. O'Neil

  2. Office of Naval Research, Inglewood Ct. 2431, Arlington, 22043, Virgin Islands, USA

    Ray S. Perez

  3. National Center for Research on Evaluati, Standards, and Student Testing, CRESST/UCLA, Charles E. Young Drive North 301, Los Angeles, 90095-1521, California, USA

    Eva L. Baker

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bowers, C., Cannon-Bowers, J. (2014). Cognitive Readiness for Complex Team Performance. In: O'Neil, H., Perez, R., Baker, E. (eds) Teaching and Measuring Cognitive Readiness. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7579-8_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation