Abstract
The statistical study of DTRs and associated methods of estimation is a young and growing field. As such, there are many topics which are only beginning to be explored. In this chapter, we point to some new developments and areas of research in the field.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Almirall, D., Ten Have, T., & Murphy, S. A. (2010). Structural nested mean models for assessing time-varying effect moderation. Biometrics, 66, 131–139.
Bodnar, L. M., Davidian, M., Siega-Riz, A. M., & Tsiatis, A. A. (2004). Marginal structural models for analyzing causal effects of time-dependent treatments: An application in perinatal epidemiology. American Journal of Epidemiology, 159, 926–934.
Gunter, L., Chernick, M., & Sun, J. (2011a). A simple method for variable selection in regression with respect to treatment selection. Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research, VII, 363–380.
Gunter, L., Zhu, J., & Murphy, S. A. (2011b). Variable selection for qualitative interactions. Statistical Methodology, 8, 42–55.
Gunter, L., Zhu, J., & Murphy, S. A. (2011c). Variable selection for qualitative interactions in personalized medicine while controlling the family-wise error rate. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 21, 1063–1078.
Hall, P., Horowitz, J., & Jing, B. (1995). On blocking rules for the bootstrap with dependent data. Biometrika, 82, 561–574.
Henmi, M., & Eguchi, S. (2004). A paradox concerning nuisance parameters and projected estimating functions. Biometrika, 91, 929–941.
Lee, S. M. S. (1999). On a class of m out of n bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 61, 901–911.
Lunceford, J. K., Davidian, M., & Tsiatis, A. A. (2002). Estimation of survival distributions of treatment policies in two-stage randomization designs in clinical trials. Biometrics, 58, 48–57.
Moodie, E. E. M., Platt, R. W., & Kramer, M. S. (2009). Estimating response-maximized decision rules with applications to breastfeeding. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 104, 155–165.
Rich, B., Moodie, E. E. M., and Stephens, D.A. (2013) Adaptive individualized dosing in pharmacological studies: Generating candidate dynamic dosing strategies for warfarin treatment. (submitted).
Topol, E. (2012). Creative destruction of medicine: How the digital revolution and personalized medicine will create better health care. New York: Basic Books.
Torrance, G. W. (1986). Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. Journal of Health Economics, 5, 1–30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chakraborty, B., Moodie, E.E.M. (2013). Additional Considerations and Final Thoughts. In: Statistical Methods for Dynamic Treatment Regimes. Statistics for Biology and Health. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7428-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7428-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7427-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7428-9
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)