Abstract
This chapter provides fundamentals of value-at-risk and conditional value-at-risk models applied to routing problems in hazardous materials transportation.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abkowitz M, Cheng P (1988) Developing a risk/cost framework for routing truck movements of hazardous materials. Accid Anal Prev 20(1):39
Abkowitz M, Eiger A, Srinivasan S (1984) Estimating the release rates and costs of transporting hazardous waste. Transport Res Rec 977:22–30
Abkowitz M, Lepofsky M, Cheng P (1992) Selecting criteria for designating hazardous materials highway routes. Transport Res Rec 1333:30–35
Acerbi C (2002) Spectral measures of risk: a coherent representation of subjective risk aversion. J Bank Finance 26:1505–1518
Acerbi C (2004) Coherent representations of subjective risk-aversion. In: Szeö G (ed) Risk measures for the 21st century. Wiley, New York, pp 147–207
Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math Finance 9(3):203–228
Batta R, Chiu S (1988) Optimal obnoxious paths on a network: transportation of hazardous materials. Oper Res 36(1):84–92. http://www.jstor.org/stable/171380
Craft R (2004) Crashes involving trucks carrying hazardous materials. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/facts-research/research-technology/analysis/fmcsa-ri-04-024.htm
Dah-Nein Tzang RML (1990) Hedge ratios under inherent risk reduction in commodity complex. J Futures Markets 10:497–504
Dowd K, Blake D (2006) After var: the theory, estimation, and insurance applications of quantile-based risk measures. J Risk Insur 73(2):193–229
Einhorn D (2008) Private profits and socialized risk. Global Association of Risk Professionals Risk Review, June/July, No. 42, pp 10–18
Erkut E, Ingolfsson A (2000) Catastrophe avoidance models for hazardous materials route planning. Transport Sci 34(2):165
Erkut E, Ingolfsson A (2005) Transport risk models for hazardous materials: revisited. Oper Res Lett 33(1):81–89
Erkut E, Verter V (1998) Modeling of transport risk for hazardous materials. Oper Res 46(5):625–642
Erkut E, Tjandra S, Verter V (2007) Hazardous materials transportation. In: Barnhart C, Laporte G (eds) Transportation, Handbooks in operations research & management science, vol 14, chap 9, North Holland, pp 539–611. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927050706140098
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (2007) Final report: designation of highway routes for hazardous materials shipments: literature review. U.S. Department of Transportation, prepared by Battelle
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (2008) Guidance document: hazardous materials routing using safety and security criteria. U.S. Department of Transportation, prepared by Battelle
Helander M, Melachrinoudis E (1997) Facility location and reliable route planning in hazardous material transportation. Transport Sci 31(3):216–226
Huang B, Cheu R, Liew Y (2004) GIS and genetic algorithms for HAZMAT route planning with security considerations. Int J Geogr Inform Sci 18(8):769–787
Jin H, Batta R (1997) Objectives derived from viewing hazmat shipments as a sequence of independent Bernoulli trials. Transport Sci 31(3):252–261
Kang Y, Batta R, Kwon C (2011) Generalized route planning model for hazardous material transportation with var and equity considerations. Working paper
Kang Y, Batta R, Kwon C. Value-at-risk model for hazardous material transportation. Ann Oper Res. doi: 10.1007/s10479-012-1285-0
Kwon C (2011) Conditional value-at-risk model for hazardous materials transportation. In: Jain S, Creasey RR, Himmelspach J, White KP, Fu M (eds) Proceedings of the 2011 winter simulation conference. pp 1708–1714
Pruzzo L, Cantet RJ, Fioretti CC (2003) Risk-adjusted expected return for selection decisions. J Anim Sci 81:2984–2988
List G, Mirchandani P, Turnquist M, Zografos K (1991) Modeling and analysis for hazardous materials transportation: risk analysis, routing/scheduling and facility location. Transport Sci 25(2):100–114
Manfredo MR, Leuthold RM (1999) Market risk and the cattle feeding margin: an application of value-at-Risk. Agribusiness 17(3):333–353
Mansini R, Ogryczak W, Speranza M (2007) Conditional value at risk and related linear programming models for portfolio optimization. Ann Oper Res 152(1):227–256
Nune R, Murray-Tuite P (2007) Comparison of potential paths selected by a malicious entity with hazardous materials: minimization of time vs. minimization of distance. Proceedings of the 2007 winter simulation conference. Washington, DC. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1351542.1351745
Nembhard D, White C III (1997) Applications of non-order-preserving path selection of hazmat routing. Transport Sci 31(3):262–271
Nocera J (2009) Risk mismanagement. The New York Times Magazine. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/04/magazine/04risk-t.html. Accessed 4 Jan 2009
Nozick L, List G, Turnquist M (1997) Integrated routing and scheduling in hazardous materials transportation. Transport Sci 31(3):200–215
Patel M, Horowitz A (1994) Optimal routing of hazardous materials considering risk of spill. Transport Res A 28(2):119–132
Pflug G (2000) Probabilistic constrained optimization: methodology and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York
ReVelle C, Cohon J, Shobrys D (1991) Simultaneous siting and routing in the disposal of hazardous wastes. Transport Sci 25(2):138
Robert Dahlgren CCL, Lawarre J (2003) Risk assessment in energy trading. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(2):503–511
Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 2(3):21–42. http://www.thejournalofrisk.com/public/showPage.html?page=1491
Rockafellar R, Uryasev S (2002) Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J Bank Finance 26(7):1443–1471
Saccomanno F, Chan A (1985) Economic evaluation of routing strategies for hazardous road shipments. Transport Res Rec 1020:12–18
Sarykalin S, Serraino G, Uryasev S (2008) Value-at-risk vs. conditional value-at-risk in risk management and optimization. Tutorials Oper Res 270-294. https://www.informs.org/content/download/132735/1131225/file/Tutorials-2008-CD-titlepage.pdf
Sherali H, Brizendine L, Glickman T, Subramanian S (1997) Low probability–high consequence considerations in routing hazardous material shipments. Transport Sci 31(3):237–251
Sivakumar RA, Rajan B, Karwan M (1993) A network-based model for transporting extremely hazardous materials. Oper Res Lett 13(2):85–93
Sodhi MS (2005) Managing demand risk in tactical supply chain planning for a global consumer electronics company. Prod Oper Manag 14:69–79
Toumazis I, Kwon C (2012) Routing hazardous materials on time-dependent networks using conditional value-at-risk. Working paper
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Toumazis, I., Kwon, C., Batta, R. (2013). Value-at-Risk and Conditional Value-at-Risk Minimization for Hazardous Materials Routing. In: Batta, R., Kwon, C. (eds) Handbook of OR/MS Models in Hazardous Materials Transportation. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 193. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6794-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6794-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6793-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6794-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)