Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Decision Making in the Social Sciences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Adaptive Decision Making and Intellectual Styles

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Psychology ((BRIEFSPSYCHOL,volume 13))

Abstract

This chapter explores four social science disciplines and their perspectives and concerns in relation to decision making. The chapter is organized into four perspectives: sociology; management; marketing and education. The key concepts covered in the sociology section include how decisions are constrained and controlled by cooperation, competition, trust, reciprocity, and social norms. The management discipline is regarded as the science of decision making and this second section explores rational decision making, risk, uncertainty, the decision school, individual, and group decision making as well as the concept of adaptive decision making. The third major section examines decision making from a marketing perspective taking a broad view of communicating information and social influences. The focus in this section centers on unlocking the black box to optimize understanding mindsets, customer behaviors, cognitive style, and market appreciation. The final section deals with adaptive decision making in education and discusses recent studies in various education sectors including compulsory schooling: mainstream, exceptional students (gifted, talented, and special), and in other sectors such as higher education, vocational education, health and medical education, and workplace learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Marketing Association, Definition of Marketing. Retrieved June 4, 2007 from http://www.marketingpower.com/AboutAMA/Pages/DefinitionofMarketing.aspx

  • Anderson, J. L., Hilborn, R. W., Lackey, R. T., & Ludwig, D. (2003). Watershed restoration—adaptive decision making in the face of uncertainty. In R. C. Wissmar & P. A. Bisson (Eds.), Strategies for restoring river ecosystems: sources of variability and uncertainty in natural and managed systems (pp. 203–232). Bethesda: American Fisheries Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, S. (1999). The influence of individual cognitive style on performance in management education. In J. Hill, S. Armstrong, M. Graff, S. Rayner, & E. Sadler-Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th annual conference of the European learning styles information network (pp. 31–50). Preston: University of Central Lancashire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baysal, Z. (2009). An application of the decision-making model for democracy education: a sample of a third grade social science lesson. Educational sciences: theory and practice, 9(1),75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettman, J. R. (1979). An information processing theory of consumer choice. Reading: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. P., Berg, C. A., & Olson, J. K. (2009). Promoting effective science teacher education and science teaching: a framework for teacher decision making. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 7(4), 821–847. doi:10.1007/s10763-008-9146-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cravera, A. (2011). L’abilità di decider oggi. L’impresa, 9, 88–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, J. B., Gerrard, P., Schoch, H., & Hong, C. L. (2002). An entrepreneurial logic for the new economy. Management Decision, 40(7/8), 734–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. C. (1951). The fundamental of top Management. New York: Harpers and Brothers publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. S. (1984). Strategic market planning: The pursuit of competitive advantage. St. Paul: West Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Mooi, M. (2011). Consumer behavior and culture: Consequences for global marketing and advertising (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (2004). What makes an effective executive. Harvard Business Review, 82(6), 58–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Easen, P., & Wilcockson, J. (1996). Institution and rational decision making in professional thinking: a false dichotomy? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24(4), 667–673. doi:10.1111/1365-2648.ep8543214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1991). Cognitive-experiential self-theory: An integrative theory of personality. In R. Curtis (Ed.), The relational self: Convergences in psychoanalysis and social psychology (pp. 111–137). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayol, H. (1916). Administration industrielle et générale; prévoyance, organization, commandement, coordination, controle. Paris: H. Dunod et E. Pinat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organization. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, J., & Buckley, P. (2011). Using technology to encourage critical thinking and optimal decision making in risk management education. Risk Management & Insurance Review, 14(2), 299–309. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6296.2011.01200.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, J. (2005). America’s Manic Entrepreneurs. The American Enterprise, 16(5), 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, J., Mazursky, D., & Solomon, S. (1999). The fundamental templates of quality ads. Marketing Science, 18(3), 333–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, K., Vance, C., & Choi, D. (2011). Examining entrepreneurial cognition: An occupational analysis of balanced linear and nonlinear thinking and entrepreneurship success. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(3), 438–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, K., Vance, C., & Paik, Y. (2008). Linking linear/nonlinear thinking style balance and managerial ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(2), 305–325. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9422-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güroğlu, B., van den Bos, W., & Crone, E. A. (2009). Neural correlates of social decision making and relationships. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167, 197–206. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04502.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1980): Encoding/decoding. In Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (Ed.), Culture, media, language, working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79 (pp. 128–138). London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, C., & Courvoisier, D. (2010). Personality and thinking style in different creative domains. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 4(3), 149–160. doi:10.1037/a0017084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harbaugh, W., Krause, K., & Liday, S. (2003). Bargaining by children. University of Oregon Economics Working Paper No. 2002-4. Retrieved 3 August, 2012 from http://pages.uoregon.edu/harbaugh/Papers/KidBargaining.pdf

  • Hardaker, J. B., Huirne, R. B. M., & Anderson, J. R. (1997). Coping with risk in agriculture. New York: CAB International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, R. P. (1980). An analysis of the decision making processes in special education. Exceptional Children, 46(7), 551–554.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. (1991). Leadership: A new synthesis. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, A., Reza, R., & Mahdi, S. (2012). Analysis the relationship between cultural intelligence and transformational leadership. International Journal of Business and Social Science., 3(14), 252–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jary, D., & Jary, J. (1995). Dictionary of sociology (2nd ed.). Glasgow: Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kepner, C., & Tregoe, B. (1965). The rational Manager. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilgour, M., & Koslow, S. (2009). Why and how do creative thinking techniques work?: Trading off originality and appropriateness to make more creative advertising. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(3), 298–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G. (2009). Streetlights and shadows. Searching for the keys to adaptive decision making. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Boston: Hart, Schaffner & Marx, Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (1991). Marketing management (7th ed.). Milan: Isedi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labrecque, M., Lafortune, V., Lajeunesse, J., Lambert-Perrault, A., Manrique, H., Blais, J., et al. (2010). Do continuing medical education articles foster shared decision making? Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 30(1), 44–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lambie, G. W., Hagedorn, W., & Ieva, K. P. (2010). Social-cognitive development, ethical and legal knowledge, and ethical decision making of counselor education students. Counselor Education & Supervision, 49(4), 228–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. (2008). Game theory and neural basis of social decision making. Nature Neuroscience, 11(4), 404–409. doi:10.1038/nn2065.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, J. (2009). The decisive moment: How the brain makes up its mind. Edinburgh: Canongate Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemons, G. (2005). When the horse drinks: Enhancing everyday creativity using elements of improvisation. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, D. V. (2006). Understanding uncertainty. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacKnight, C. (2000). Teaching critical thinking through online discussions. Educause Quarterly, 4, 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W. (1987). Modeling coordination in organizations and markets. Management Science, 33(10), 1317–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W. (2004). The future of work: How the new order of business will shape your organization, your management style, and your life. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, B. C. (1981). Career decision making patterns of gifted and talented adolescents: Implications for career education. Journal of Career Education, 7(4), 305–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauboussin, M. J. (2008). More than you know: Finding financial wisdom in unconventional places. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaulley, M. H. (1999). The Myers-Briggs type indicator and leadership. In K. E.Clark & M. B.Clark (Eds.), Measures of leadership (pp. 381–418). West Orange: Leadership Library of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, D., Gardia, A., & Rathore, H. S. (2010). Teacher participation in the decision making process: reality and repercussions in Indian higher education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative & International Education, 40(5), 659–671. doi:10.1080/03057921003638171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monga, A. B. & John D. R. (2007). Cultural differences in brand extension evaluation: the influence of analytic versus holistic thinking. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 529–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, M., & McMillan, K. (2012). The decision dilemma. HR Monthly, Australian Human Resource Institute, August, pp. 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, C. (1995). Organizational market information processes: Cultural antecedents and new product outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(August), 318–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A. (2008). ‘I can’t do any more education’: class, individualization and educational decision making. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 60(4), 349–362. doi:10.1080/13636820802591749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, J. W., & Walker, O. C, Jr. (1996). Competency, prior performance, opportunity framing, and competitive response: Exploring some behavioral decision theory perspectives. Marketing Letters, 7(March), 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicosia, F. M. (1966). Consumer decision process: Marketing and advertising implications. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niguidila, D. (1997). Picturing performance with digital portfolios. Educational Leadership, 55(30), 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutt, P. (1993). The formulation process and tactics used in organizational decision making. Organization Science, 4, 226–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, A. (1995). Validation of a decisional scale. Medical Decision Making, 15(1), 25–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. W. (1982). Contingent decision behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 382–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, W., & Burrell, D. (2009). Decision making skills that encompass a critical thinking orientation for law enforcement professionals. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 11(2), 141–149. doi:10.1350/ijps.2009.11.2.118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porzsolt, F., Ohletz, A., Thim, A., Gardner, D., Ruatti, H., Meier, H., et al. (2003). Evidence-based decision making—the six step approach. Evidence Based Medicine, 8, 165–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu, J., & Stewart, D. W. (2001). Signaling Strategies in Competitive Interaction: Building Reputations and Hiding the Truth. Journal of Marketing, 38(February), 62–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, S., & Sicilia, M. (2004). The impact of cognitive and/or affective processing styles on consumer response to advertising appeals. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 657–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. (2011). How we think: a theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational implications. New york: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1995). Decision making style: The development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 818–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shevlin, M., & Rose, R. (2008). Pupils as partners in education decision making: responding to the legislation in England and Ireland. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 23(4), 423–430. doi:10.1080/08856250802387430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative behavior. New York: The free press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative behavior (2nd ed.). New York: The free press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, B. (2004). Context and background: Pierre Bourdieu’s analysis of class, gender and sexuality. The Sociological Review, 52(2), 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007, November 1). A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from http://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making/ar/1

  • Sofo, F. (1999). Human resource development: Perspectives, roles and practice choices. Woodslane: Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofo, F. (2002). Thinking style inventory. University of Canberra, Australia. (Unpublished). (Australian and Chinese versions).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofo, F. (2004). Open your mind: the seven keys to thinking critically. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofo, F., & Colapinto, C. (2008). Studiare le performance dei manager attraverso l’analisi dei thinking style. Un approccio comparativo internazionale. In D. La Torre & G. Pizzutto (Eds.), Metodi e Modelli per la finanza e il management (pp. 79–100). Torino: Giappichelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofo, M., & Sofo, F. (in press-a). E-marketing as an antecedent to online fraud. In H. El-Gohary & R. Eid (Eds.). E-marketing in developed and developing countries: Emerging practices. Pennsylvania: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofo, F., & Sofo, M. (in press-b) Promoting critical thinking in virtual teams: lessons from the higher education sector. In K. Boateng & E. Nikoi (Eds.), Collaborative processes and decision making in organizations. Pennsylvania: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steckroth, R. L., S. Locum, J. W., Jr & Sims, H. P. Jr. (1980). Organizational roles, cognitive roles, and problem-solving styles. Journal of Experiential Learning and Simulation, 2, 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1998). The nature of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strudler, N., & Wetzel, K. (2005). The diffusion of electronic portfolios in teacher education: issues of initiation and implementation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(4), 411–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds. Philadelphia: Anchor books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutter, M., & Kocher, M. (2007). Trust and trustworthiness across different age groups. Games and Economic Behavior, 59, 364–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, G. (2009). Tools for data-driven decision making in teacher education: designing a portal to conduct field observation inquiry. Journal of Computing In Teacher Education, 25(3), 107–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallman, I., & Gray, L. (1990). Choices, decisions and problem-solving. Annual Review of Sociology, 16(1), 405–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tharp, R. G. (1989). Psychocultural variables and constants: Effects on teaching and learning in schools. American Psychologist, 44, 349–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organization in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullett, A. D. (1997). Cognitive style: Not culture’s consequence. European Psychologist, 2(3), 258–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vinitzky, G., & Mazursky, D. (2011). The effects of cognitive thinking style and ambient scent on online consumer approach behavior, experience approach behavior, and search motivation. Psychology & Marketing, 28(5), 496–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H. (2003). Educating managers for decision making and leadership. Management Decision, 41(10), 968–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia. Prospect theory. (2012) Retrieved November 19, 2012 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prospect_theory

  • Wilhelm, L., Puckett, K., Beisser, S., Wishart, W., Merideth, E., & Sivakumaran, T. (2006). Lessons learned from the implementation of electronic portfolios at three universities. Tech Trends: linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 50(4), 62–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyn, J., & Woodman, D. (2006). Generation, youth and social change in Australia. Journal of Youth Studies, 9(5), 495–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ysseldyke, J. E., Algozzine, B., & Mitchell, J. (1982). Special education team decision making: An analysis of current practice. Personnel & Guidance Journal, 60(5), 308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Science, Technology and Maths, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia

    Francesco Sofo & Michelle Sofo

  2. Department of Management, Ca’ Foscari University, San Giobbe- Cannareggio, 873, 30121, Venice, Italy

    Cinzia Colapinto

  3. Department of Mechanical, Energetic and Management Engineering, University of Calabria, Ponte Pietro Bucci Cubo 42/C, 87036, Arcavacata di Rende, Cosenza, Italy

    Salvatore Ammirato

Authors
  1. Francesco Sofo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cinzia Colapinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michelle Sofo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Salvatore Ammirato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Sofo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sofo, F., Colapinto, C., Sofo, M., Ammirato, S. (2013). Decision Making in the Social Sciences. In: Adaptive Decision Making and Intellectual Styles. SpringerBriefs in Psychology, vol 13. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6708-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation