Skip to main content

Modeling Risk Sharing Agreements and Patient Access Schemes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Operations Research and Health Care Policy

Abstract

Risk sharing agreements are becoming an increasingly common type of contract between drug manufacturers and third party payers such as private insurance companies and public sector health plans. In a risk sharing agreement a payer will agree to include a drug on its formulary in the presence of a contract that reduces some of the payer’s risk. Payer risk may be caused by high uncertainty in sales volume, cost, effectiveness, or cost-effectiveness of a new drug. In this chapter we review the literature on risk sharing agreements, identify some opportunities for future research in the area, and highlight some policy implications associated with their use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ontario Ministry of Health (2008) Ontario Drug Benefit Formulary/Comparative Drug Index No. 41. Queen’s Printer for Ontario, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tilson L, Barry M (2005) European pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement strategies. National Centre for Pharmacoeocnomics, Dublin, Ireland, p 166

    Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor RS et al. (2004) Inclusion of cost effectiveness in licensing requirements of new drugs: the fourth hurdle. BMJ 329:972–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. OECD (2005) Drug spending in OECD countries up by nearly a third since 1998, according to new OECD data. http://www.oecd.org/document/25/0,2340,en_2649_201185_34967193_1_1_1_1,00.html. Accessed 15 Nov 2011

  5. OECD (2011) Quarterly National Accounts MetaData: Quarterly Growth Rates of real GDP, change over previous quarter. http://www.oecd.org/document/25/0,2340,en_2649_201185_34967193_1_1_1_1,00.html. Accessed 23 Nov 2011

  6. Sullivan R et al. (2011) Delivering affordable cancer care in high-income countries. Lancet Oncol 12(10):933–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lowry F (2010) Erlotinib for advanced NSCLC is “marginally” cost effective. Medscape Medical News. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/717585. Accessed 15 Nov 2011

  8. Towse A, Garrison LP Jr (2010) Can’t get no satisfaction? Will pay for performance help? Toward an economic framework for understanding performance-based risk-sharing agreements for innovative medical products. Pharmacoeconomics 28(2):93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carlson JJ et al. (2010) Linking payment to health outcomes: a taxonomy and examination of performance-based reimbursement schemes between healthcare payers and manufacturers. Health Policy 96(3):179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Adamski J et al. (2010) Risk sharing arrangements for pharmaceuticals: potential considerations and recommendations for European payers. BMC Health Serv Res 10:153

    Google Scholar 

  11. BBC News (2009) Green light for bowel cancer drug. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8077515.stm. Accessed 15 Nov 2011

  12. Devlin K (2009) Kidney cancer patients should get Sutent on the NHS, says NICE. In: The Telegraph. London. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/4449605/Kidney-cancer-patients-should-get-Student-on-the-NHS-says-NICE.html. Accessed 7 Feb 2013

    Google Scholar 

  13. BBC News (2009) Deal reached on NHS myeloma drug. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7859053.stm. Accessed 15 Nov 2011

  14. BBC News (2007) Cancer-drug refund scheme backed. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6713503.stm

  15. Wilkinson E (2010) NHS missing out on cancer drug payments. BBC News, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schuler C, Faulker LP (2009) Pay for play. PharmaExec.com

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pollack A (2007) Pricing pills by the results. New York Times, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2002) Technology appraisal No. 32. Guidance on the use of beta interferon and glatiramer acetate for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London, UK, p 25

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rafferty J (2010) Multiple sclerosis risk sharing scheme: a costly failure. BMJ 340:c1672

    Google Scholar 

  20. McCabe C et al. (2010) Continuing the multiple sclerosis risk sharing scheme is unjustified. BMJ 340:c1786

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ebers GC (2010) Commentary: Outcome measures were flawed. BMJ 340:c2693

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zaric GS, O’Brien BJ (2005) Analysis of a pharmaceutical risk sharing agreement based on the purchaser’s total budget. Health Econ 14(8):793–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zaric GS, Xie B (2009) A comparison of two risk sharing agreements. Value in Health 12(5):838–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang H, Zaric GS (2011) Promotion and leakage under a pharmaceutical price-volume agreement. INFOR 49(4):247–253

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mahjoub R, Odegaard FK, Zaric GS (2011) Modeling the dynamics of a risk sharing agreement. INFORMS Healthcare, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lilico A (2003) Risk-sharing pricing models in the distribution of pharmaceuticals. Staff Working Paper. Europe Economics, London

    Google Scholar 

  27. Barros PP (2011) The simple economics of risk-sharing agreements between the nhs and the pharmaceutical industry. Health Econ 20(4):461–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Antonanzas F, Juarez-Castello C, Rodriguez-Ibeas R (2011) Should health authorities offer risk-sharing contracts to pharmaceutical firms? A theoretical approach. Health Econ Policy Law 6(3):391–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gandjour A (2009) Pharmaceutical risk sharing agreements. Pharmacoeconomics 27(5):431–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang H, Huang T, Zaric GS (2011) Optimal design of a price volume agreement in the presence of unobservable marketing effort. Working paper

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang H, Zaric GS, Huang T (2011) Optimal design of a pharmaceutical price-volume agreement under asymmetric information about expected market size. Prod Oper Manage 20(3):334–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cook JP, Vernon JA, Manning R (2008) Pharmaceutical risk-sharing agreements. Pharmacoeconomics 26(7):551–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. de Pouvourville G (2006) Risk-sharing agreements for innovative drugs: a new solution to old problems? Eur J Health Econ 7(3):155–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Neumann PJ et al. (2011) Risk-sharing arrangements that link payment for drugs to health outcomes are proving hard to implement. Health Aff (Millwood) 30(12):2329–2337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Robertson J, Walkom EJ, Henry DA (2009) Transparency in pricing arrangements for medicines listed on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. Aust Health Rev 33(2):192–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Williamson S (2010) Patient access schemes for high-cost cancer medicines. Lancet Oncol 11(2):111–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dana JD, Spier KE (2001) Revenue sharing and vertical control in the video rental industry. J Ind Econ 49(3):223–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cachon GP, Lariviere MA (2001) Contracting to assure supply: how to share demand forecasts in a supply chain. Manage Sci 47(5):629–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jena AB, Philipson TJ (2008) Cost-effectiveness analysis and innovation. J Health Econ 27(5):1224–1236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pearson SD (2007) Getting the innovation we want. Health Aff (Millwood) 26(5):1506–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ingram J (2011) Eliminating innovation: how price controls limit access. J Leg Med 32(1):115–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Scherer FM (2009) Price controls and global pharmaceutical progress. Health Aff (Millwood) 28(1):161–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lakdawalla DN et al. (2009) US pharmaceutical policy in a global marketplace. Health Aff (Millwood) 28(1):138–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Garber AM, McClellan MB (2007) Satisfaction guaranteed—“Payment by Results” for biologic agents. N Engl J Med 357:1575–1577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Garrison LP et al. (2008) Paying for pills by result: Performance-based rewards for innovation. ISPOR Annual Meeting, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory S. Zaric .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zaric, G.S., Zhang, H., Mahjoub, R. (2013). Modeling Risk Sharing Agreements and Patient Access Schemes. In: Zaric, G. (eds) Operations Research and Health Care Policy. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 190. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6507-2_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics