Skip to main content

The Biopolitics of Defining “Mental Disorder”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Making the DSM-5

Abstract

What is psychiatry, and how does it relate to other medical and mental health disciplines? Apart from the obvious sociological answer—psychiatrists are physicians who have completed residency training in psychiatry—psychiatry has always struggled to define itself with precision. Unlike pediatrics or geriatrics, psychiatry does not define itself by reference to a specific demographic population. Unlike general surgery or anesthesiology or radiology, it does not define itself exclusively with reference to specific technologies or interventional practices: the majority of psychotropic medications in the United States are prescribed by nonpsychiatrists [1]. Unlike certain medical specialties such as nephrology or cardiology, psychiatry cannot lay exclusive claim to a particular body part or organ system: although psychiatry is often referred to as a “clinical neuroscience” [2], psychiatry at best shares this distinction with neurology, neurosurgery, and neuropsychology. Nor can psychiatry define itself according to a particular institutional structure of practice, since psychiatrists have long shed their historic identification with inpatient institutions and now work within a broad and diverse array of practice settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Stagnitti M. Antidepressants prescribed by medical doctors in office based and outpatient settings by specialty for the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population, 2002 and 2005. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, Statistical Brief #206.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Insel T, Quirion R. Psychiatry as a clinical neuroscience discipline. JAMA. 2005;294:2221–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. American Psychiatric Association. What is psychiatry? [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2012 Sept 9]. http://www.psychiatry.org/about-apa--psychiatry/more-about-psychiatry.

  4. Bayer R. Homosexuality and American psychiatry: the politics of diagnosis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Elliott C. Better than well: American medicine meets the American dream. New York: W. W. Norton; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Horwitz AV, Wakefield JC. The loss of sadness: how psychiatry transformed normal sorrow into depressive disorder. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gert B, Culver CM. Sex, immorality, and mental disorders. J Med Philos. 2009;34:487–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Szasz T. The myth of mental illness: foundations of a theory of personal conduct. Revised ed. New York: Harper & Row; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Foucault M. History of madness. London: Routledge; 2006 [J. Murphy, trans].

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mayes R, Horwitz AV. DSM-III and the revolution in the classification of mental illness. J Hist Behav Sci. 2005;41:249–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goffman E. Asylums: essays on the social situations of mental patients and other inmates. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kesey K. One flew over the cuckoo’s nest. New York: Penguin Classics; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenhan DL. On being sane in insane places. Science. 1973;179:250–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Scadding JG. Diagnosis: the clinician and the computer, Lancet. 1967;7521:877–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kendell RE. The concept of disease and its implications for psychiatry. Br J Psychiatry. 1975;127:305–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Klein DF. A proposed definition of mental illness. In: Spitzer RL, Klein DF, editors. Critical issues in psychiatric diagnosis. New York: Raven; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Spitzer RL. The diagnostic status of homosexuality in DSM-III: a reformulation of the issues. Am J Psychiatry. 1981;138:210–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Spitzer RL, Endicott J. Medical and mental disorder: proposed definition and criteria. In: Spitzer RL, Klein DF, editors. Critical issues in psychiatric diagnosis. New York: Raven; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The definition and diagnosis of mental disorder. In: Gove WR, editor. Deviance and mental illness. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Skodol AE. DSM-III: the major achievements and an overview. Am J Psychiatry. 1980;137:151–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd revised ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  23. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Frances A, Pincus HA, Widiger TA, Davis WW, First MB. DSM-IV: work in progress. Am J Psychiatry. 1990;147:1439–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Definition of a mental disorder [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2 Oct 2012]. http://www.dsm5.org/proposedrevision/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=465.

  26. Phillips J, Frances A, Cerullo MA, Chardavoyne J, Decker HS, First MB, et al. The six most essential questions in psychiatric diagnosis: a pluralogue Part 1: conceptual and definitional issues in psychiatric diagnosis. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine. 2012;7:2. doi:10.1186/1747-5341-7-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rounsaville BJ, Alarcon RD, Andrews G, Jackson JS, Kendell RE, Kendler K. Basic nomenclature issues for DSM-V. In: Kupfer DA, First MB, Regier DA, editors. A research agenda for DSM-V. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stein DJ, Phillips KA, Bolton D, Fulford KWM, Sadler JZ, Kendler KS. What is a mental/psychiatric disorder? From DSM-IV to DSM-V. Psychol Med. 2010;40:759–65.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kendler KS, Appelbaum PS, Bell CC, Fulford KWM, Ghaemi SN, Shaffner KF, et al. Issues for DSM-V: DSM-V should include a conceptual issues workgroup. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165:174–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wakefield JC. The concept of mental disorder: on the boundary between biological facts and social values. Am Psychol. 1992;47:373–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wakefield JC. Diagnosing DSM-IV—Part I: DSM-IV and the concept of disorder. Behav Res Ther. 1997;35:633–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual: mental disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Mental Hospital Service; 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fulford KWM, Smirnov AYU, Snow E. Concepts of disease and the abuse of psychiatry in the USSR. Br J Psychiatry. 1993;162:801–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bolton D. What is mental disorder? An essay in philosophy, science, and values. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Sadler JZ, Agich GJ. Diseases, functions, values, and psychiatric classification. PPP. 1995;2:219–31.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wakefield JC. Dysfunction as a value-free concept: a reply to Sadler and Agich. PPP. 1995;2:233–46.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fulford KWM. Nine variations and a coda on the theme of an evolutionary definition of dysfunction. J Abnorm Psychol. 1999;108:412–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Fulford KWM. Teleology without tears: naturalism, neo-naturalism, and evaluationism in the analysis of function statements in biology (and a bet on the twenty-first century). PPP. 2000;7:77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sadler JZ. Values and psychiatric diagnosis. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Blazer DG. The age of melancholy: ‘major depression’ and its social origins. New York: Routledge; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kirmayer LJ. Psychotherapy and the cultural concept of the person. Transcult Psychiatry. 2007;44:232–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chen Y, Nettles ME, Chen S. Rethinking dependent personality disorder: comparing different human relatedness in cultural contexts. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2009;197:793–800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Warren Kinghorn MD, ThD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kinghorn, W. (2013). The Biopolitics of Defining “Mental Disorder”. In: Paris, J., Phillips, J. (eds) Making the DSM-5. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6504-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6504-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6503-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6504-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics