Abstract
In this chapter simulated qubits take on another dimension, the phase of the “1.” For each qubit this phase is held by a separate recursive neuron dedicated to recording phase. As in quantum theory, it is possible to employ this extra phase variable to develop useful algorithms. For instance, a simulated qubit may be prepared to be either [1 1]′ or [1 −1]′ but generally these cannot be distinguished by direct sampling and readout since both would give a true result. However after application of the h-transform, defined below, [1 1]′ is easily distinguished from [1 −1]′.
Two simulated qubits [a 1 a 2]′, [b 1 b 2]′ may be prepared to be [1 1]′, [1 1]′ meaning that each has 50 % probability of being true and 50 % probability of being false. Overall there are probabilities for the following combinations a 1 b 1, a 1 b 2, a 2 b 1, a 2 b 2. A multivibrator function is defined to be one that places a negative sign on one more of these terms, which is assumed to be accomplished by phase transforms on the simulated qubit vectors. Generalizing, for any number of simulated qubits, the locations of the negative signs will be congruent to the ones of a particular Boolean function. Negative signs are invisible in the sampling method, which provides only positive probabilities. So it is difficult to identify a multivibrator function by direct observation, should it be unknown.
However, for certain families of Boolean multivibrator functions, ways have been discovered to classify them. A variation on the Deutsch’s quantum algorithm permits classification of a multivibrator function of a single variable, using only one application of the function. A generalization to symmetric and antisymmetric functions, defined below, permits classification of binary multivibrator functions of many variables using only one application of the function. A variation on Grover’s algorithm, defined below, permits the relatively efficient identification of a code that satisfies a known multivibrator decoding function (a function that is true for exactly one binary combination as input).
Finally it is noted in this chapter that phase could be used to increase the capacity of biological memory. A data-packing example is given using n simulated qubits, in which each simulated qubit may be [1 0]′, [0 1]′, or [1 1]′ resulting in far more than the humble 2n codes that n bits usually provide.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Note that a function is implemented by operations that change the sign of selected terms in the Prepared List to become the Tagged List.
References
Burger JR (2011) Neural networks that emulate qubits. NeuroQuantology 9:910–916
Pittenger AO (1999) An introduction to quantum computing algorithms. Birkhauser, Boston, MA
Burger JR (2011) Symmetric and anti-symmetric quantum functions. arXiv:cs/0304016, 13 June 2011
Nielson MA, Chuang IL (2000) Quantum computation and quantum information, Cambridge series on information and the natural sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [Paperback]
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burger, J.R. (2013). The Phase of the “1”. In: Brain Theory From A Circuits And Systems Perspective. Springer Series in Cognitive and Neural Systems, vol 6. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6412-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6412-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6411-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6412-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)