Abstract
Ferdinand Georg Frobenius was born in Berlin on 26 October 1849. He was a descendant of a family stemming from Thüringen, a former state in central Germany and later a part of East Germany. Georg Ludwig Frobenius (1566–1645), a prominent Hamburg publisher of scientific works, including those written by himself on philology, mathematics, and astronomy, was one of his ancestors. His father, Christian Ferdinand, was a Lutheran pastor, and his mother, Christiane Elisabeth Friedrich, was the daughter of a master clothmaker.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
A listing of the semesters in which Weierstrass lectured on abelian integrals and functions is given in vol. 3 of his Mathematische Werke, the volume containing of a version of these lectures.
- 3.
According to Frobenius [202, p. 712], in 1858 Kronecker sent a (now lost) manuscript containing some such extension to Dirichlet and Kummer. In 1882, on the occasion of the fiftieth anniversary of Kummer’s doctorate, he presented a sketch of his ideas as they stood then [363], but they were difficult to follow. Edwards [150] has given a possible reconstruction of what Kronecker had in mind.
- 4.
See Frobenius’ discussion of this and related results [202, pp. 712–713].
- 5.
This is clear from the vita at the end of his doctoral dissertation [171, p. 34], as is the fact that his other courses at Berlin were in physics and philosophy.
- 6.
In 1875 Frobenius published a paper [176] that was an outgrowth of the work he had done on the prize problem.
- 7.
The occasion was a proposal to the Prussian minister of culture of a new associate professorship in mathematics, with Frobenius as the choice to fill the new position. The entire document is given by Biermann [22, pp. 189ff.]; the quotation below is from pp. 190–191.
- 8.
- 9.
See [22, p. 85], where the quotations below about Frobenius’ dissertation and doctoral examination are given in the original German.
- 10.
I am grateful to my colleague Dan Weiner for supplying the translations.
- 11.
The information in this paragraph is drawn from a document published by Biermann [22, p. 191].
- 12.
In discussing Fuchs’ work, as well as the related work of Frobenius, I have drawn upon Gray’s more definitive account [255, Chs. II–III].
- 13.
Thomé should not be confused with Carl Johannes Thomae (1840–1921), who also worked in complex function theory but had received his doctorate from Göttingen in 1864 and then spent two semesters attending Weierstrass’ lectures in Berlin before becoming an instructor in Göttingen in 1866. In 1874 he became a full professor at the University of Freiburg, where he spent the rest of his career.
- 14.
For an account of Schwarz’s work see [255, pp. 70–77].
- 15.
- 16.
Let \(g(x) \in \mathbb{K}[x]\) denote the minimal polynomial of V with \(m =\deg g(x)\). Then since \(\mathbb{K}(a_{1},\ldots,a_{n}) = \mathbb{K}[V ]\), each root a i of f(x) is uniquely expressible as a polynomial in V, \(a_{i} =\phi _{i}(V )\), where \(\phi (x) \in \mathbb{K}[x]\) has degree at most m − 1. If \(V ^{\prime},V ^{\prime\prime},\ldots,{V }^{(m-1)}\) are the other roots of the minimal polynomial g(x), then G consists of m permutations \(\sigma _{1},\ldots,\sigma _{m}\) of \(a_{1},\ldots,a_{n}\) with σ k the mapping that takes the root \(a_{i} =\phi _{i}(V )\) to \(\phi _{i}({V }^{(k)})\), which is also a root a i ′ of f(x), so \(\sigma _{k}: a_{i} \rightarrow a_{i^{\prime}}\) for i = 1, …, n and \(k = 0,\ldots,m - 1\). In the nineteenth century, permutations in the sense of mappings of a finite set of symbols were called “substitutions.” In the example at hand, σ k substituted the arrangement (or permutation) a 1′ , …, a n ′ for the original arrangement a 1, …, a n . Readers interested in a more detailed and historically accurate portrayal of Galois’ ideas, including a detailed working out of Galois’ sketchy remarks about the construction and properties of V, should consult Edwards’ lucid exposition of Galois’ memoir [148], which includes as appendix an annotated English translation of the memoir.
- 17.
Perhaps what he meant is illustrated by the example \(f(y,z) = {z}^{n}{y}^{n} - 1 = 0\). In this case, \({y}^{n} = 1/{z}^{n}\), and so letting z → z 0 = 0, y n → ∞. Of course, \(f(y, 0) = -1\) is a polynomial of degree zero with no roots. What Frobenius meant more generally was perhaps that at singular points z = z 0, a n (z 0) = 0.
- 18.
In what follows, I focus on the group G and omit the subgroups G ∗ that result by adjunction of function elements, although Theorem IX applies more generally to G ∗ .
- 19.
Assume that \(f(y,z) \in \mathbb{K}[y]\), \(\mathbb{K} = \mathbb{C}(z)\), is irreducible and that a 1, …, a m are the singular points a, meaning the points at which f(y, a) has a multiple root or has degree in y less than n, i.e., a n (a) = 0. By the identity theorem, the singular points are finite in number, say a 1, …, a m . Let Γ denote a non-self-intersecting polygonal line joining \(a_{1},\ldots,a_{m},\infty \), and set \(D = \mathbb{C} \sim \Gamma \). Then D is an open, connected, and simply connected set, and by the Weierstrass monodromy theorem each locally defined root y j (z) has an extension Y j (z) to D that is single-valued and analytic. (See, e.g., [348, pp. 126–127].) The identity theorem implies that f(z, Y j (z)) = 0 throughout D. That same theorem implies that Frobenius’ Theorem IX holds with the y j (z) replaced by the Y j (z). Thus if \(\mathbb{L}\) is the field of all meromorphic functions defined on D and expressible rationally in terms of Y 1, …, Y n , then \(\mathbb{L} \supset \mathbb{K} = \mathbb{C}(z)\) and \(\mathbb{L} = \mathbb{K}(Y _{1},\ldots,Y _{n})\) is a splitting field for f(y, z) over \(\mathbb{K}\). Furthermore, by Frobenius’ Theorem IX (as extended to Y 1, …, Y n ), his group G can be identified with \(\mathrm{Aut}(\mathbb{L}, \mathbb{K})\). Thus G is a bona fide Galois group.
- 20.
The French word is substitution, which was used in the nineteenth century for permutations in the modern sense of mappings, as indicated in the earlier footnote on Galois’ definition of the group associated to a polynomial equation.
- 21.
- 22.
Suppose f is irreducible over \(\mathbb{K}\) in the usual sense and that ( ∗ ) fails to hold. Then \(g \in \mathbb{K}[x]\) exists with degg < degf and \(g(a) = f(a) = 0\). But \((f,g)_{\mathbb{K}} = 1\), so \(p,q \in \mathbb{K}[x]\) exist such that \(p(x)f(x) + q(x)g(x) = 1\), and setting x = a implies 0 = 1. Conversely, if f satisfies ( ∗ ), it cannot be reducible, for then f(x) = g(x)h(x), where g, h have degrees less than n. If \(a \in \mathbb{C}\) is a root of f, then \(0 = f(a) = g(a)h(a)\) implies without loss of generality that g(a) = 0, contrary to ( ∗ ).
- 23.
- 24.
See Table 3.2 in Gray’s book [255, p. 87].
- 25.
Chapter III of Gray’s book [255] is devoted to all the work done on Fuchs-type equations that can be integrated algebraically.
- 26.
Stenographic notes of these lectures were reproduced by the university. Copies are located in the Bibliothek Mathematik und Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften at the University of Hamburg.
- 27.
Weierstrass’ negative opinion of Frobenius’ fiancée and of his decision to leave Berlin for Zurich is contained in a letter to Sonya Kovalevskaya dated 23 September 1875 [28, p. 219].
References
Anonymous. Georg Frobenius. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich, page 719, 1917.
K.-R. Biermann. Die Mathematik und ihre Dozenten an der Berliner Universität 1810–1920. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1973.
R. Bölling, editor. Briefwechsel zwischen Karl Weierstrass und Sofja Kowalewskaja. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1993.
A. L. Cauchy. Application du calcul des résidus à l’intégration de quelques équations différentielles linéaires et à coefficients variables. Exercises de mathématiques, 1, 1826. Reprinted in Oeuvres (2) 6, 261–264.
A. L. Cauchy. Mémoire sur les arrangements que l’on peut former avec des lettres donneés, et sur les permutations ou substitutions à la aide desquelles on passe d’un arrangement à un autre. Exercises d’analyse et de physique mathématique, 3:151–252, 1844. Reprinted in Oeuvres (2) 13, 171–282.
H. Edwards. Galois Theory. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984.
H. Edwards. Divisor Theory. Birkhäuser, Boston, 1990.
G. Frobenius. De functionum analyticarum unis variabilis per series infinitas repraesentatione. Dissertatio inauguralis mathematica … . A. W. Schadii, Berlin, 1870.
G. Frobenius. Über die Entwicklung analytischer Functionen in Reihen, die nach gegebenen Functionen fortschreiten. Jl. für die reine u. angew. Math., 73:1–30, 1871. Reprinted in Abhandlungen 1, 35–64. Essentially a German-language reworking of his Berlin dissertation [171].
G. Frobenius. Über die algebraischer Auflösbarkeit der Gleichungen, deren Coefficienten rationale Functionen einer Variablen sind. Jl. für die reine u. angew. Math., 74:254–272, 1872. Reprinted in Abhandlungen 1, 65–83.
G. Frobenius. Über die Integration der linearen Differentialgleichungen durch Reihen. Jl. für die reine u. angew. Math., 76:214–235, 1873. Reprinted in Abhandlungen 1, 84–105.
G. Frobenius. Über den Begriff der Irreductibilität in der Theorie der linearen Differentialgleichungen. Jl. für die reine u. angew. Math., 76:236–270, 1873. Reprinted in Abhandlungen 1, 106–140.
G. Frobenius. Anwendungen der Determinantentheorie auf die Geometrie des Maaßes. Jl. für die reine u. angew. Math., 79:184–247, 1875. Reprinted in Abhandlungen 1, 158–220.
G. Frobenius. Über algebraisch integrirbare lineare Differentialgleichungen. Jl. für die reine u. angew. Math., 80:183–193, 1875. Reprinted in Abhandlungen 1, 221–231.
G. Frobenius. Über die regulären Integrale der linearen Differentialgleichungen. Jl. für die reine u. angew. Math., 80:317–333, 1875. Reprinted in Abhandlungen 1, 232–248.
G. Frobenius. Gedächtnisrede auf Leopold Kronecker. Abhandlungen d. Akad. der Wiss. zu Berlin, pages 3–22, 1893. Reprinted in Abhandlungen 3, 707–724.
L. Fuchs. Zur Theorie der linearen Differentialgleichungen mit veränderlichen Coefficienten. Jahresbericht über die städtliche Gewerbeschule zu Berlin, Ostern 1865, 1865. Reprinted in Werke 1, 111–158.
L. Fuchs. Zur Theorie der linearen Differentialgleichungen mit veränderlichen Coefficienten. Jl. für die reine u. angew. Math., 66:121–160, 1866. Reprinted in Werke 1, 159–202.
L. Fuchs. Zur Theorie der linearen Differentialgleichungen mit veränderlichen Coefficienten (Ergänzungen zu der im 66sten Bande dieses Journals enthaltenen Abhandlung). Jl. für die reine u. angew. Math., 68:354–385, 1868. Reprinted in Werke 1, 205–240.
E. Galois. Oeuvres mathématiques d’Évariste Galois. Jl. de math. pures et appl., 11:381–444, 1846. Reprinted as a book, Oeuvres mathématiques d’Évariste Galois, Paris, 1897.
J. Gray. Linear Differential Equations and Group Theory from Riemann to Poincaré. Birkhäuser, Boston, 2nd edition, 2000.
M. Hamburger. Review of [172]. Jahrbuch über die Fortschritte der Mathematik, 3, 1874.
T. Hawkins. Emergence of the Theory of Lie Groups. An Essay on the History of Mathematics 1869–1926. Springer, New York, 2000.
C. Jordan. Traité des substitutions et des équations algébriques. Gauthier–Villars, Paris, 1870.
K. Knopp. Theory of Functions, Part II. Dover, New York, 1947. Translated from the 4th German edition.
L. Kronecker. Grundzüge einer arithmetischen Theorie der allgebraischen Grössen. (Abdruck einer Festschrift zu Herrn E. E. Kummers Doctor-Jubiläum, 10 September 1881.) Jl. für die reine u. angew. Math., 92:1–122, 1882. Reprinted in Werke 2, 237–387.
M. Kuga. Galois’ Dream: Group Theory and Differenial Equations. Birkhäuser, Boston, 1993. Translated from the Japanese by Susan Addington and Motohico Mulase.
B. Riemann. Theorie der Abel’schen Functionen. Jl. für die reine u. angew. Math., 54, 1857. Reprinted in Werke, pp. 88–144.
N. Stuloff. Frobenius: Ferdinand Georg, Mathematiker. In Neue Deutsche Biographie, volume 5, page 641. Duncker and Humblot, 1960.
L. W. Thomé. Zur Theorie der linearen Differentialgleichungen. Jl. für die reine u. angew. Math., 76:273–302, 1873.
H. Wussing. The Genesis of the Abstract Group Concept. A Contribution to the History of Abstract Group Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1984. Abe Shenitzer, transl., 1984. Translation of [612].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hawkins, T. (2013). A Berlin Education. In: The Mathematics of Frobenius in Context. Sources and Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6333-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6333-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6332-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6333-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)