Abstract
In the literature, problem posing is claimed to be important in learning mathematics. This study investigated US and Chinese high school students’ attitudes and abilities in posing mathematical problems. All of the participants were taking advanced mathematics in high school. A mathematics content test and a mathematical problem-posing test were administered to the students. The mathematical content test was adapted from the National Assessment of Educational Progress for 12th graders. The problem-posing test included three situations, namely a free problem-posing situation, a semi-structured problem-posing situation, and a structured problem-posing situation. Students who scored 39 or above out of 50 points were interviewed. During the interviews, the majority of the students reported that they had not had any prior experience in posing mathematical problems. Many students did not have a specific strategy for posing problems, and many had difficulty explaining their problem-posing processes. Most of the US students for various reasons said that problem posing was important in mathematics. Most Chinese students said that problem posing was not important in high school learning because of college entrance examinations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barlow, A. T., & Cates, J. M. (2006). The impact of problem posing on elementary teachers’ beliefs about mathematics and mathematics teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 106(2), 64–73.
Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (2005). The art of problem posing (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Cai, J. (1998). An investigation of U.S. and Chinese students’ mathematical problem posing and problem solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 10(1), 37–50.
Cai, J. (2000). Mathematical thinking involved in U.S. and Chinese students’ solving process-constrained and process-open problems. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2, 309–340.
Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2002). Generalized and generative thinking in U.S. and Chinese students’ mathematical problem solving and problem posing. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 401–421.
Dillon, J. T. (1982). Problem finding and solving. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 16, 97–111.
Ellerton, N. F. (1986). Children’s made-up mathematics problems: A new perspective on talented mathematicians. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17(3), 261–271.
English, L. D. (1997). Development of seventh-grade students’ problem posing. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 241–248). Lahti, Finland: PME.
English, L. D. (2003). Engaging students in problem posing in an inquiry-oriented mathematics classroom. In F. K. Lester Jr. & I. C. Randall (Eds.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving: Prekindergarten-grade 6 (pp. 187–269). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
English, L. D., & Halford, G. S. (1995). Mathematics education: Models and processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jay, E. S., & Perkins, D. N. (1997). Problem finding: The search for mechanism. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 257–293). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Li, X., & Wang, J. (2006). Problem-posing-based mathematical learning [基于问题提出的数学学习] (Doctoral dissertation). East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Mathematics Curriculum Development Group of Basic Education of Education Department [教育部基础教育司数学课程标准研制组]. (2002). The interpretation of mathematics curriculum (Trial Version) [数学课程标准(实验稿)解读]. Beijing, China: Beijing Normal University Press.
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2009). The National Assessment of Educational Progress Overview. Retrieved August 28, 2009, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/mathematics/
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Peverly, S. (2005). Moving past cultural homogeneity: Suggestions for comparisons of students’ educational outcomes in the United States and China. Psychology in the Schools, 42(3), 241–249.
Presmeg, N. C. (1981). Parallel threads in the development of Albert Einstein’s thought and current ideas on creativity: What are the implications for the teaching of school mathematics (Unpublished M.Ed. dissertation in Educational Psychology). University of Natal.
Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. Retrieved July 29, 2007, from http://www.emis.de/journals/ZDM/zdm973a3.pdf
Stoyanova, E. (1997). Extending and exploring students’ problem solving via problem posing: A study of years 8 and 9 students involved in Mathematics Challenge and Enrichment Stages of Euler Enrichment Program for Young Australians (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia.
Stoyanova, E., & Ellerton, N. F. (1996). A framework for research into students’ problem posing in school mathematics. In P. C. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology in mathematics education (pp. 518–525). Melbourne, Australia: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 43–75). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Van Harpen, X. Y., & Presmeg, N. (2013). An investigation of relationships between students’ mathematical problem-posing abilities and their mathematical content knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 117–132.
Van Harpen, X. Y., & Sriraman, B. (2013). Creativity and mathematical problem posing: An analysis of high school students’ mathematical problem posing in China and the United States. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(2), 201–221.
Yuan, X., & Sriraman, B. (2010). An exploratory study of relationships between students’ creativity and mathematical problem posing abilities—Comparing Chinese and U.S students. In B. Sriraman, & K. Lee (Eds.), The elements of creativity and giftedness in mathematics (pp. 5–28). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Yuan, X., & Sriraman, B. (2010b). An exploratory study of relationships between students’ creativity and mathematical problem posing abilities—Comparing Chinese and U.S students. In B. Sriraman & K. Lee (Eds.), The elements of creativity and giftedness in mathematics (pp. 5–28). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Zeng, X., Lu, C., & Wang, B. (2006). Actuality and countermeasure of “posing mathematical problem” on junior high school students [初中生“提出数学问题”的现状与对策]. Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), 51–53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Van Harpen, X., Presmeg, N. (2015). An Investigation of High School Students’ Mathematical Problem Posing in the United States and China. In: Singer, F., F. Ellerton, N., Cai, J. (eds) Mathematical Problem Posing. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_14
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6257-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6258-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)