Abstract
In recent years M&A has been as a prominent strategy in the context of inter-firm technology transfer. Prior literature has evaluated the latter by using different types of post-merger innovation measurements. In this connection the chapter provides a framework to analyze the effects of corporate acquisitions on innovation quality. The approach presumes that an acquirer’s post-merger innovation outcome is a function of learning capabilities with respect to recent technologies.
We investigate a sample of German domestic and cross-border takeovers, in order to analyze the ex-ante determinants of post-merger innovation quality. The data is based on patent information from the German Patent and Trade Mark Office.
The results show that especially middle-aged and specialized acquirers achieve improved innovation quality subsequent to takeovers. Furthermore, the measurement via patent citations allows a more direct consideration of the value created by corporate acquisitions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acs ZJ, Preston L (1997) Small and medium-sized enterprises, technology, and globalization: introduction to a special issue on small and medium-sized enterprises in the global economy. Small Bus Econ 9(1):1–6
Ahuja G, Katila R (2001) Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strateg Manage J 22(3):197–220
Ahuja G, Lampert MC (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strateg Manage J 22(6–7):521–543
Akerlof GA (1970) The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q J Econ 84(3):488–500
Audretsch DB, Acs ZJ (1991) Innovation and size at the firm level. South Econ J 57(3):739–744
Balasubramanian N, Lee J (2008) Firm age and innovation. Ind Corp Change 17(5):1019–1047
Bowman EH, Hurry D (1993) Strategy through the option lens: an integrated view of resource investments and the incremental-choice process. Acad Manage Rev 18(4):760–782
Capron L, Shen JC (2007) Acquisitions of private vs. public firms: private information, target selection, and acquirer returns. Strateg Manage J 28(9):891–911
Cassiman B, Colombo MG, Garrone P, Veugelers R (2005) The impact of M&A on the R&D process: an empirical analysis of the role of technological- and market-relatedness. Res Policy 34(2):195–220
Chakrabarti A, Hauschildt J, Süverkrüp C (1994) Does it pay to acquire technological firms? R&D Manage 24(1):047–056
Child J. (1972) “Organization structure, environment, and performance: The role of strategic choice”, Sociology, Vol. 6 (January 2971), pp: 1–22
Cloodt M, Hagedoorn J, Kranenburg HV (2006) Mergers and acquisitions: their effect on the innovative performance of companies in high-tech industries. Res Policy 35(5):642–654
Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1989) Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Econ J 99(397):569–596
Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35(1, Special Issue: Technology, Organizations, and Innovation):128–152
Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1994) Fortune favors the prepared firm. Manage Sci 40(2):227–251
Desyllas P, Hughes A (2009) The revealed preferences of high technology acquirers: an analysis of the innovation characteristics of their targets. Camb J Econ 33(6):1089–1111
Desyllas P, Hughes A (2010) Do high technology acquirers become more innovative? Res Policy 39(8):1105–1121
Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ (2005) When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures? Strateg Manage J 26(10):947–965
Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Manage Sci 47(1):117–132
Greene W (2003) Econometric analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. J Econ Lit 28(4):1661–1707
Grimpe C, Hussinger K (2008) Pre-empting technology competition through firm acquisitions. Econ Lett 100(2):189–191
Hagedoorn J, Cloodt M (2003) Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Res Policy 32(8):1365–1379
Hagedoorn J, Duysters G (2002) The effect of mergers and acquisitions on the technological performance of companies in a high-tech environment. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 14(1):67–85
Hall BH, Berndt E, Levin RC (1990) The impact of corporate restructuring on industrial research and development. Brookings Pap Econ Activ Microecon 1990:85–124
Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The nber patent citations data file lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER working paper series (8498), pp 1–74
Harhoff D, Narin F, Scherer FM, Vopel K (1999) Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Rev Econ Stat 81(3):511–515
Henderson R, Cockburn I (1994) Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strateg Manage J 15(S1):63–84
Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Ireland RD, Harrison JS (1991) Effects of acquisitions on R&D inputs and outputs. Acad Manage J 34(3):693–706
Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Johnson RA, Moesel DD (1996) The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Acad Manage J 39(5):1084–1119
Hussinger K (2010) On the importance of technological relatedness: SMEs versus large acquisition targets. Technovation 30(1):57–64
Hussinger K (2011) Absorptive capacity and post-acquisition inventor productivity. J Technol Trans, August 2012, 37(4):490–507
Jaffe AB (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market values. Am Econ Rev 76(5):984–1001
Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Q J Econ 108(3):577–598
Katz R, Allen TJ (1982) Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: a look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Manage 12(1):7–20
Lane PJ, Lubatkin M (1998) Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strateg Manage J 19(5):461–477
Lang G (2009) Measuring the returns of R&D: an empirical study of the German manufacturing sector over 45 years. Res Policy 38(9):1438–1445
Lanjouw JO, Schankerman M (2004) Patent quality and research productivity: measuring innovation with multiple indicators. Econ J 114(495):441–465
Lehmann EE, Braun T, Krispin S (2011) Entrepreneurial human capital, complementary assets, and takeover probability. J Technol Trans, October 2012, 37(5):589–608
Leonard-Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strateg Manage J 13(S1):111–125
Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strateg Manage J 14(S2):95–112
Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annu Rev Sociol 14:319–340
Link AN, Rees J (1990) Firm size, university based research, and the returns to R&D. Small Bus Econ 2(1):25–31
Makri M, Lane PJ (2007) Responding to technological maturity: a sociocognitive model of science and innovation in technological communities. J High Technol Manage Res 18(1):1–14
Makri M, Hitt MA, Lane PJ (2010) Complementary technologies, knowledge relatedness, and invention outcomes in high technology mergers and acquisitions. Strateg Manage J 31(6):602–628
Moeller SB, Schlingemann FP, Stulz RM (2005) Wealth destruction on a massive scale? A study of acquiring-firm returns in the recent merger wave. J Finance 60(2):757–782
Prabhu JC, Chandy RK, Ellis ME (2005) The impact of acquisitions on innovation: poison pill, placebo, or tonic? J Mark 69(1):114–130
Ranft AL, Lord MD (2002) Acquiring new technologies and capabilities: a grounded model of acquisition implementation. Organ Sci 13(4):420–441
Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 94(5):1002–1037
Sampson RC (2007) R&D alliance and firm performance: the impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Acad Manage J 50(2):364–386
Schumpeter J (1934) The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Shen JC, Reuer JJ (2005) Adverse selection in acquisitions of small manufacturing firms: a comparison of private and public targets. Small Bus Econ 24:393–407
Smolny W (1998) Innovations, prices and employment: a theoretical model and an empirical application for west German manufacturing firms. J Ind Econ 46(3):359–381
Spence AM (1973) Job market signaling. Q J Econ 87(3):355–374
Trajtenberg M (1990) A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. Rand J Econ 21(1):172–187
Valentini G (2011) Measuring the effect of M&A on patenting quantity and quality. Strategic Management Journal, March 2012, 33(3):336–346
Veugelers R (2006) Literature review on M&A and R&D. In: Cassiman B, Colombo MG (eds) Mergers & acquisitions: the innovation impact. Elgar, Northampton
Winship C, Morgan SL (1999) The estimation of causal effects from observational data. Annu Rev Sociol 25(1):659–706
Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad Manage Rev 27(2):185–203
Zhao X (2009) Technological innovation and acquisitions. Manage Sci 55(7):1170–1183
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Buss, P. (2012). The Impact of Technological Acquisitions on Innovation Quality. In: Audretsch, D., Lehmann, E., Link, A., Starnecker, A. (eds) Technology Transfer in a Global Economy. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 28. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6102-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6102-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6101-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6102-9
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)