Abstract
Virtual Repatriation has caught the attention of the anthropological, archaeological, museological, and indigenous communities in recent years. The conjoined terms have been applied to everything from an alternative for material repatriation, to Reciprocal Research Networks, to almost any form of digital data sharing with source communities. There is no doubt that there is, and has been, a great number of good works that designate themselves as Virtual Repatriation. However, the problem, as we see it, is not the works themselves, in most instances, but the conjunction of the “virtual” with “repatriation.” In this chapter, the authors will challenge the use of the terms “virtual,” but mostly the term “repatriation” in conjunction with anything but patrimony. The challenge is not merely pedantic, but points to the larger social and political implications, and communal and historic consequences, of collapsing patrimony with their representations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Banks, M., & Morphy, H. (1999). Rethinking visual anthropology. Hartford: Yale University Press.
Basu, P. (2011). Object diasporas, resourcing communities: Sierra Leonean collections in the global museumscape. Museum Anthropology, 34(1), 28–42.
BBC News. (2003). ‘No return’ for Elgin Marbles. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/2791877.stm [Last Updated: 23 Sunday Feb 2003, 13:40 GMT]. Accessed 29 Apr 2012.
Boast, R. (2002). Computing futures: a vision of the past. In B. Cunliffe, W. Davies, & C. Renfrew (Eds.), Archaeology: the widening debate (pp. 567–592). London: British Academy.
Boast, R., Bravo, M., & Srinivasan, R. (2007). Return to Babel: emergent diversity, digital resources, and local knowledge. The Information Society, 23(5), 395–403.
Christen, K. (2009). Access and accountability: the ecology of information sharing in the digital age. Anthropology News, “Visual Ethics”. 4–5 Apr 2009.
Christen, K. (2010). “Digital Repatriation: Practices and Possibilities” invited session as part of the protocols for native American archival materials. Society of American Archivists annual conference, Washington DC, 12 Aug 2010.
Christen, K. (2011a) Opening archives: respectful repatriation. American Archivist. 74, 185–210.
Christen, K. (2011b). Opening archives: respectful repatriation. The American Archivist, 74, 185–210.
Garb, Y. (1987). Virtual reality computers encourage substitution of symbols for the world. Whole Earth Review, 57, 118–125.
Geismar, H. (2008). Cultural property, museums, and the Pacific: reframing the debates. International Journal of Cultural Property, 15, 109–122.
Gill, T. (2001). 3D culture on the Web. RLG DigiNews 5(3). http://webdoc.gwdg.de/edoc/aw/rlgdn/preserv/diginews/diginews5-3.html. Accessed 29 Apr 2012.
Harraway, D. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature. London: Free Association Books.
Houghton, D. (2010). What is virtual repatriation? museumsandtheweb.com: The Online Space for Museum Informatics. http://www.museumsandtheweb.com/forum/what_virtual_repatriation. Accessed 29 Apr 2012.
Jessop, M. & Hogsden, C. (2010). ‘Virtual repatriation’ – what is it? can it work? Unpublished paper presented at the Pacific Arts Association Xth International Symposium: Pacific Art in the 21st century: museums, new global communities and future trends, 9–11 Aug 2010, Rarotonga, Cook Islands.
Lynch, M. (1994). Representation is overrated. Configurations, 2, 137–149.
Lynch, M., & Woolgar, S. (1990). Representation in scientific practice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
NAGPRA Glossary. (1991). National Park Service, US Department of the Interior. http://www.nps.gov/nagpra/TRAINING/GLOSSARY.HTM. Accessed 14 Apr 2012.
Nash, S., & Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C. (2010). NAGPRA after two decades. Museum Anthropology, 33(2), 99–104.
Oxford English Dictionary Additions Series. 1997. OED Online. Oxford University Press. http://dictionary.oed.com. Accessed 11 Sept. 2012.
Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. OED Online. Oxford University Press. http://dictionary.oed.com. Accessed 11 Sept. 2012.
Pickering, A. (1992). From science as knowledge to science as practice. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science and practice and culture (pp. 1–28). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Rowley, S., Schaepe, D., Sparrow, L., Sanborn, A., Tadermacher, U., Wallace, R., Jakobsen, N., et al. (2010). ‘Building an on-line research community’: the reciprocal research network. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2010/papers/rowley/rowley.html. Accessed 25 Oct 2012.
Srinivasan, R., Becvar, K. M., Boast, R., & Enote, J. (2010). Diverse knowledges and contact zones within the digital museum. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 35(5), 735–768.
The Plateau Peoples’ Web Portal. (n.d.) About. http://plateauportal.wsulibs.wsu.edu/html/ppp/index.php. Accessed 29 Mar 2012.
Turnbull, D. (2007). Maps narratives and trails: performativity, hodology and distributed knowledges in complex adaptive systems – an approach to emergent mapping. Geographical Research, 45(2), 140–149.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boast, R., Enote, J. (2013). Virtual Repatriation: It Is Neither Virtual nor Repatriation. In: Heritage in the Context of Globalization. SpringerBriefs in Archaeology, vol 8. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6077-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6077-0_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6076-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6077-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)