Skip to main content

Pattern Analysis of the Creativity of a Digitalist Considering Its Antecedents and Task Diversity: A Multi-Agent Simulation Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Creativity

Part of the book series: Integrated Series in Information Systems ((ISIS,volume 32))

  • 1972 Accesses

Abstract

The capability to produce digital devices and digital creativity has become the core of national industrial competitiveness. In this sense, companies try to enhance their digital creativities to more firmly establish their competitiveness in the marketplace. Examples of success that were realized through good use of digital creativity include the iPhone and iPod by Apple, the Wii by Nintendo, and social networking Web sites such as Cyworld, Facebook, and Twitter. However, no study has focused on identifying the antecedents of digital creativity considering task diversity. The purpose of this research is to longitudinally explore the evolutionary pattern of digital creativity in order to explain how communication effectiveness, task expertise, and the tendencies of digitalists affect digital creativity, with a focus on task diversity. To test the validity of the proposed digital creativity model over time, we adopted multi-agent simulation (MAS) using the NetLogo platform to test the digital creativity model over 48 time lags. The simulation results were examined via ANOVA and were robust and promising.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amabile, T.M.: A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In: Staw, B.M., Cummings, L.L. (eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 10, pp. 123–167. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amabile, T.M.: How to kill creativity. Keep doing what you’re doing. Or, if you want to spark innovation, rethink how you motivate, reward, and assign work to people. Harv. Bus. Rev. 76(5), 77–87 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ashworth, M., Carley, K.: Who you know vs. What You know: The impact of social position and knowledge on team performance. J. Math. Sociol. 30, 43–75 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bakker, H., Boersma, K., Oreel, S.: Creativity (Ideas) Management in Industrial R&D Organizations: A crea-political process Model and an empirical illustration of corus RD&T. J. Creat. Innov. Manage. 15(3), 296–309 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K.: The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Pers. Psychol 44(1), 1–26 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barrick, M.R., Stewart, G.L., Neubert, M.J., Mount, M.K.: Relating member ability and ­personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. J. Appl. Psychol. 83, 377–391 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brass, D.: Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Adm. Sci. Q. 26, 331–348 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Canessa, E., Riolo, R.: An agent-based model of the impact of computer-mediated communication on organizational culture and performance: An example of the application of complex systems analysis tools to the study of CIS. J. Inf. Technol. 21, 272–283 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, M.H.: Understanding the benefits and detriments of conflict on team creativity process. Creativ. Innov. Manage. 15(1), 105–116 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Drucker, P.: Post-Capitalist Society. Harper Business, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dubin, R.: Power, function and organization. Pac. Sociol. Rev. 6, 16–24 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Feldhusen, J.F., Goh, B.E.: Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development. Creativ. Res. J. 8(3), 231–247 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Feldhusen, J.F.: Creativity: A knowledge base, meta cognitive skills and personalities factors. J. Creativ. Behav. 29(4), 255–268 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Giaccardi, E., Fischer, G.: Creativity and evolution: A meta design perspective. Digit. Creativ. 19(1), 19–32 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gilbert, N., Troitzsch, K.G.: Simulation for the Social Scientist, 2nd edn. Open University Press, Milton Keynes (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gino, F., Argote, L., Miron-Spektor, E., Todorova, G.: First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 111(2), 102–115 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hahn, Christian, Fley, Bettina, Florian, Michael, Spresny, Daniela and Fischer, Klaus (2007). ‘Social Reputation: a Mechanism for Flexible Self-Regulation of Multiagent Systems’. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 10(1)2. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/10/1/2.html

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hambrick, D.C., D’Aveni, R.A.: Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Manage. Sci. 38(10), 1445–1466 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Harrison, D.A., Humphrey, S.E.: Designing for diversity or diversity for design? Tasks, interdependence, and within-unit differences at work. J. Organ. Behav. 31, 328–337 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Harrison, D.A., Price, K.H., Bell, M.P.: Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Acad. Manage. J. 41(1), 96–107 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Harrison, D.A., Price, K.H., Gavin, J.H., Florey, A.T.: Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Acad. Manage. J. 45(5), 1029–1045 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hinings, C., Hickson, D., Pennings, J., Schneck, R.: Structural conditions of intraorganizational power. Adm. Sci. Q. 19, 22–44 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hogg, L.M.I., Jennings, N.R.: Socially intelligent reasoning for autonomous agents. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. Hum. 31(5), 381–393 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jackson, S.E.: Consequences of group composition for the interpersonal dynamics of strategic issue processing. In: Shrivastava, P., Huff, A., Dutton, J. (eds.) Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 8, pp. 345–382. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jehn, K.A., Northcraft, G.B., Neale, M.A.: Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Adm. Sci. Q. 44(4), 741–763 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim, W., Mauborgne, R.: Implementing global strategies: The role of procedural justice. Strateg. Manage. J. 12, 125–143 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kratzer, J., Gemünden, H.G., Lettl, C.: Balancing creativity and time efficiency in multi-team R&D projects: The alignment of formal and informal networks. R&D Manage. 38(5), 538–549 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lant, T.K., Milliken, F.J., Batra, B.: The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation: An empirical exploration. Strateg. Manage. J. 13(8), 585–608 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lazaric, N., Raybaut, A.: Knowledge creation facing hierarchy: The dynamics of groups inside the firm. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simulat. 7(2) (2004). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/7/2/3.html

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lee, H., Choi, B.: Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. J. Manage Inf. Syst. 20(1), 179–228 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Leonard, D., Swap, W.: When Sparks Fly: Igniting Creativity in Group. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lubart, T.I.: Creativity. In: Sternberg, R.J. (ed.) Thinking and Problem Solving, pp. 289–332. Academic, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mansfield, R.S., Busse, T.V.: The Psychology of Creativity and Discovery: Scientists and Their Work. Nelson-Hall, Chicago (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mellow, E.: The two-conditions view of creativity. J. Creativ. Behav. 30(2), 126–143 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. O’Reilly, C., Snyder, R., Boothe, J.: Effects of executive team demography on organizational change. In: Humber, G., Glick, W. (eds.) Organizational Change and Redesign: Ideas and Insights for Improving Performance, pp. 147–175. Oxford, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  36. O’Reilly, C.A., Caldwell, D.F., Barnett, W.P.: Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Adm. Sci. Q. 34(1), 21–37 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Palmer, Victor (2006). ‘Simulation of the Categorization-Elaboration Model of Diversity and Work-Group Performance’. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 9(3)3. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/3/3.html

    Google Scholar 

  38. Persson, P., Laaksolahti, J., Lonngvist, P.: Understanding socially intelligent agents—A multilayered phenomenon. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. Hum. 31(5), 349–360 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ricchiuto, J.: Collaborative Creativity: Unleashing the Power of Shared Thinking. Oakhill Press, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Saunders, R., Gero, J.S.: Artificial creativity: A synthetic approach to the study of creative behaviour. In: Gero, J.S., Maher, M.L. (eds.) Computational and Cognitive Models of Creative Design V, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, pp. 113–139. University of Sydney, Sydney (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sawhney, M., Prandelli, E.: Communities of creation: Managing distributed innovation in turbulent markets. Calif. Manage. Rev. 42(4), 24–54 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Schelling, T.C.: Micromotives and Macrobehavior. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. New York, USA (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sole, R., Goodwin, B.: Signs of Life: How Complexity Pervades Biology. Basic Books, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sternberg, R.J., Lubart, T.I.: Defying the Crowd. Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity. Free Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sternberg, R.J.: The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives, pp. 3–7. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Stumpf, H.: Scientific creativity: A short overview. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 7, 225–241 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Taylor, T.: Creativity in evolution: individuals, interactions, and environments. In: Bentley, P.J., Corne, D.W. (eds.) Creative Evolutionary Systems, pp. 79–108. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  48. Tesluk, P.E., Farr, J.L., Kelin, S.R.: Effect of system’s culture and climate on person’s creativity. J. Creativ. Behav. 31(3), 27–41 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Thurow, L.C.: Building Wealth: The New Rules for Individuals, Companies, and Nations in a Knowledge-Based Economy. Harper Collins, New York, USA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Waldrop, M.: Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Chaos. Simon & Schuster, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Williams, W.M., Yang, L.T.: Organizational creativity. In: Sternberg, R.J. (ed.) Handbook of Creativity, pp. 373–391. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Woodman, R.W., Sawyer, J.E., Griffin, R.W.: Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad. Manage. Rev. 18(2), 293–321 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Woodman, R.W., Schoenfeldt, L.F.: Individual Differences in Creativity An Inter-actionist Perspective. Handbook of Creativity, pp. 77–92. Plenum Press, New York and London (1989)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Korea Research Foundation Grant funded by the Korean Government (KRF-2009-342-B00015). This research was also partially supported by WCU (World Class University) program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (Grant No. R31-2008-000-10062-0).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kun Chang Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Seo, Y.W., Lee, K.C., Chae, S.W. (2013). Pattern Analysis of the Creativity of a Digitalist Considering Its Antecedents and Task Diversity: A Multi-Agent Simulation Approach. In: Lee, K. (eds) Digital Creativity. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol 32. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5749-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5749-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5748-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5749-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics