Skip to main content

Multidisciplinary Approach and Coordination of Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Essentials of Palliative Care

Abstract

Palliative care aims to reduce distress, enhance functioning, and improve the quality of life of people and their families facing life-threatening diseases, rather than directly aiming at cure or disease modification. Palliative care addresses the multiple domains of needs and concerns of the patient and the family—physical, psychological, social, and spiritual. These needs cannot be addressed by one single person or agency without causing fragmentation of care. Hence a multidisciplinary approach is the backbone of palliative care. In this approach, inputs are obtained and integrated from multiple sources depending upon, among other factors, stage of disease progression, pain and other symptoms, patient’s and family’s psychological state, social and practical requirements, and available resources. Doctors, nursing staff, social worker, and many others involved in the multifaceted care of the patient form the multidisciplinary team, which provides this care in a coordinated manner so as to provide continuity of care. There are many advantages of the multidisciplinary approach, and its efficacy has been demonstrated convincingly in increasing satisfaction of the patient and family, improving quality of life, and even a modest increase in survival for some patients. However, the multidisciplinary approach has its own barriers and challenges. Some of these can be at least partly overcome with an effective coordination of care between different locations, personnel, and time points of care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. jointcommission.org. Washington, DC: The Joint Commission. Advanced certification for palliative care programs. http://www.jointcommission.org/certification/palliative_care.aspx. Updated 24 Oct 2011; cited 25 Oct 2011.

  2. who.int. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. WHO definition of palliative care. http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/. Updated 24 Oct 2011; cited 25 Oct 2011.

  3. National Consensus Project for Palliative Care. Clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care. 2nd ed. Pittsburgh: National Consensus Project for Palliative Care; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  4. National Quality Forum. A national framework and preferred practices for palliative and hospice care quality. Washington, DC: National Quality Forum; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crawford GB, Price SD. Team working: palliative care as a model of interdisciplinary practice. Med J Aust. 2003;179:S32–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jessup RL. Interdisciplinary versus multidisciplinary care teams: do we understand the difference? Aust Health Rev. 2007;31:330–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Horvath LE, Yordan E, Malhotra D, Leyva I, Bortel K, Schalk D, et al. Multidisciplinary care in the oncology setting: historical perspective and data from lung and gynecology ­multidisciplinary clinics. J Oncol Pract. 2010;6:e21–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rummans TA, Clark MM, Sloan JA, et al. Impacting quality of life for patientswith advanced cancer with a structured multidisciplinary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:635–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Walker MS, Ristvedt SL, Haughey BH, et al. Patient care in multidisciplinary cancer clinics: does attention to psychosocial needs predict patient satisfaction? Psychooncology. 2003;12:291–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Newman EA, Guest AB, Helvie MA, et al. Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at a breast cancer multidisciplinary tumor board. Cancer. 2006;107:2346–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bakitas M, Lyons KD, Hegel MT, et al. Effects of a palliative care intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer: the Project ENABLE II randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009;302:741–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Temel JS, Greer JA, Muzikansky A, et al. Early palliative care for patientswith metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:733–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Meier DE, Brawley OW. Palliative care and the quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2750–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Carey M, Sanson-Fisher R, Lotfi-Jam K, Schofield P, Aranda S. Multidisciplinary care in cancer: do the current research outputs help? Eur J Cancer Care. 2010;19:434–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hammond DB. Multidisciplinary cancer care in a hospital setting: challenges and rewards. J Oncol Pract. 2010;6:281–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Look Hong NJ, Gagliardi AR, Bronskill SE, Paszat LF, Wright FC. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: exploring obstacles and facilitators to their implementation. J Oncol Pract. 2010;6:61–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Walsh J, Harrison JD, Young JM, Butow PN, Solomon MJ, Masya L. What are the current barriers to effective cancer care coordination? A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Morrison RS, Meier DE. Palliative care. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2582–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Victorian Government Department of Human Services. Linking cancer care: a guide for implementing coordinated cancer care. Melbourne: Victorian Government Department of Human Services; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sukanya Mitra M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Review Questions

  1. 1.

    According to the World Health Organization definition of palliative care, the essential aim of palliative care is to:

    1. (a)

      Correct the underlying metabolic derangements in life-threatening disease

    2. (b)

      Focus on disease modification

    3. (c)

      Improve the quality of life

    4. (d)

      Provide symptomatic and psychosocial support exclusively for the patient

  2. 2.

    Palliative care is:

    1. (a)

      Disease centered

    2. (b)

      Patient centered

    3. (c)

      Family centered

    4. (d)

      Patient- and family centered

  3. 3.

    The needs addressed by palliative care does not include:

    1. (a)

      Spiritual

    2. (b)

      Curative

    3. (c)

      Psychosocial

    4. (d)

      Physical

  4. 4.

    The number of domains of palliative care endorsed by both National Consensus Project (NCP) and National Quality Forum (NQF) is:

    1. (a)

      4

    2. (b)

      6

    3. (c)

      8

    4. (d)

      10

  5. 5.

    According to NCP Clinical Practice Guidelines 2009, the core group in an interdisciplinary (multidisciplinary) palliative care team should have professionals from all the following disciplines except:

    1. (a)

      Psychology

    2. (b)

      Social work

    3. (c)

      Nursing

    4. (d)

      Medicine

  6. 6.

    According to expanded model and scope of palliative care, such care can start at the level of :

    1. (a)

      Primary care

    2. (b)

      Secondary care

    3. (c)

      Tertiary care

    4. (d)

      Any of the above levels

  7.  7.

    The following statement is true regarding research-evidenced benefits of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) in palliative care:

    1. (a)

      Modest increase in survival of certain cancer patients

    2. (b

      No effect on patient satisfaction

    3. (c)

      No effect on quality of life

    4. (d)

      Time delay in reaching consensus opinions

  8.  8.

    Coordination of care is important for:

    1. (a)

      The patient

    2. (b)

      The MDT

    3. (c)

      The healthcare system

    4. (d)

      All of the above

  9.  9.

    For patients in palliative care, the overall aim of coordination of care is to provide:

    1. (a)

      Consultations from various doctors

    2. (b)

      Arrangement of MDT meetings

    3. (c)

      Continuity of care over time and across settings

    4. (d)

      Bereavement counseling

  10. 10.

    The Advanced Certification Program for Palliative Care announced by the Joint Commission is designed for the following type of palliative care program (as of September 2011):

    1. (a)

      Outpatient based

    2. (b)

      Inpatient based

    3. (c)

      Community based

    4. (d)

      Hospice based

Answers

  1. 1.

    (c)

  2. 2.

    (d)

  3. 3.

    (b)

  4. 4.

    (c)

  5. 5.

    (a)

  6. 6.

    (d)

  7. 7.

    (a)

  8. 8.

    (d)

  9. 9.

    (c)

  10. 10.

    (b)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mitra, S., Vadivelu, N. (2013). Multidisciplinary Approach and Coordination of Care. In: Vadivelu, N., Kaye, A., Berger, J. (eds) Essentials of Palliative Care. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5164-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5164-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5163-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5164-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics