Skip to main content

Helping Couples Deal with Relationship Ambivalence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cognitive and Rational-Emotive Behavior Therapy with Couples

Abstract

To be or not to be in this relationship … that is the question. This chapter discusses relationship ambivalence and provides suggestions and strategies to help couples work through this issue. Given that the adult life cycle has been lengthening in recent years, and consequently, the time spent in relationships, the clinical issue of ambivalence presents itself with more frequency in therapy. Individuals are often asking themselves “Should I stay or should I go?” and struggling to find an answer to this question. This chapter discusses the subjective experience of ambivalence and the development of five main skills therapists can employ to help the couple or the individual work through the ambivalence. A case study illustrates the dilemmas associated with ambivalence as well as the application of therapeutic techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, J. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Psychology, 2, 266–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambivalence. (2012, February). Retrieved from Merriam-Webster: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ambivalence

  • Berger, C. (1987). Communicating under uncertainty. Interpersonal Processes: New Directions in Communication Research, 14, 39–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broder, M. (2002). Can your relationship be saved?: How to know whether to stay or go. Atascadero, CA: Impact.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1994). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy: A comprehensive method of treating human disturbances. New York, NY: Carol Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erber, R., & Erber, M. (2001). Intimate relationships: Issues theories and research. Needham Heights, MA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, J. R., DiGiuseppe, R., O’Leary, S., Fountain, T., & Lang, C. (2010). An open trial of a comprehensive anger treatment program on an outpatient sample. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 27, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, T. (2000). Parent effectiveness training. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., Utne, M., & Traupmann, J. (1979). Equity theory and intimate relationships. In R. Burgess & T. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 99–133). New York, NY: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirshenbaum, M. (1996). Too good to leave, too bad to stay: A step-by-step guide to help you decide whether to stay or get out of your relationship. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, M., & Adelman, M. (1983). Communication networks and the development of romantic relationships: An expansion of uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research, 10, 55–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. (1973). New directions in equity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Walster, G., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Dowling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A: Modified CBA Exercise Template Relationship Ambivalence: Should I Stay or Should I Go?

Appendix A: Modified CBA Exercise Template Relationship Ambivalence: Should I Stay or Should I Go?

Staying

Advantages (benefits or rewards)

Disadvantages (costs and risks)

S/T

L/T

Imp

S/T

L/T

Imp

Going

Advantages (benefits or rewards)

Disadvantages (costs and risks)

S/T

L/T

Imp

S/T

L/T

Imp

Note: First column instructs client to identify whether each item is long term (L/T), short term (S/T), or both. Second column instructs client to identify the degree of importance, each item ranging from 1—not at all important, 2—slightly important, 3—moderately important, 4—very important, and 5—extremely important.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dowling, R., Evarts, S.O., Vernon, A. (2012). Helping Couples Deal with Relationship Ambivalence. In: Vernon, A. (eds) Cognitive and Rational-Emotive Behavior Therapy with Couples. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5137-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics