Skip to main content
  • 1175 Accesses

Abstract

Although the pertinence of implicit assumptions is underlined in theory-based evaluations, the nature of these assumptions has been rarely discussed. To understand the nature of underlying assumptions, it is necessary to review the notion of assumptions in general and its remarkable role in the generation of knowledge. This chapter discusses the nature of assumptions and groups in 10 categories of assumptions according to Brookfield’s (Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1995) typology: Paradigmatic, Prescriptive and Causal assumptions and according to the degree of articulation.

Even the most well-intentioned person unwittingly allows unconscious thoughts and feelings to influence apparently objective decisions

Banaji, M. N. in Fine and Handelsman 2006, p. 1

Every human society rests on assumptions that, most of the time, are not only unchallenged but not even reflected upon. In other words, in every society there are patterns of thought that most people accept without question as being of the very nature of things

Trachman and Bluestone 2005, p. 131

To deny a proposition is not the same as to confirm its denial. …Given a proposition P, there is an associated proposition not-P. Either of these…may be merely supported or assumed. But when we deny P, we are not concerned with mere assumption, and there is nothing to be done with P that is logically equivalent to assuming not-P….the state of mind in which we reject a proposition is not the same as that in which we accept its negation

Russell 1904, p. 336

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akalis, S. A., Banaji, M. R., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2008). Crime alert! How thinking about a single suspect automatically shifts stereotypes toward an entire group du bois review. Social Science Research on Race, 5(2), 217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banaji, M. R., & Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7(3), 136–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (1994). Implicit stereotyping and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 17, pp. 55–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, G. E. (1933). Assumptions. The Accounting Review, 8(2), 157–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo, A. E., Talley, E., & Welch, I. (2000). A theory of legal presumptions. Economics and Law, 16(1), 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(3), 242–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, I. V., Jennifer, E. M., & Lenton, A. P. (2001). Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 828–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchner, A., & Wippich, W. (1996). Unconscious gender bias in fame judgments? Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowgill, D. O. (1964). Value assumptions in recent research on migration. International Migration Digest, 1(1), 29–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, F. K. (1998). Walking out on the boys. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 276–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliot, T. D. (1937). Reactions to predictive assumptions. American Sociological Review, 2(4), 508–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. H. (1982). Identifying implicit assumptions. Synthese, 51(1), 61–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, E., & Handelsman, J. (2006). Reviewing applicants: Research on bias and assumptions. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogarty, R. J. (1994). How to teach metacognitive reflection. New York: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, L. P., Francomano, C. A., MacDonald, S. M., Wagner, E. M., Stokes, E. J., Carbone, K. M., et al. (1996). Career development for women in academic medicine: Multiple interventions in a department of medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 898–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harste, J. C., Woodward, V. A., & Burke, C. L. (1984). Examining our assumptions: A transactional view of literacy and learning. Research in the Teaching of English, 18(1), 84–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, C., Aronson, J., & Harder, J. A. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women’s achievement in high-level math courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(1), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 416–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanazawa, S. (1988). In defense of unrealistic assumptions. Sociological Theory, 16(2), 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kies, D. (1995). Assumptions. Retrieved December 20, 2011 from http://papyr.com/hypertextbooks/comp2/assume.htm.

  • Kotze, D. A. (1987). Contradictions and assumptions in community development. Community Development Journal, 22(1), 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. A. (2003). Classification of the philosophical assumptions of management science. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(6), 559–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemeyer, G. (1955). A query about assumptions on international organization. World Politics, 7(2), 337–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, S. (2003). Freeing assumptions from the Liar paradox. Analysis, 63(2), 162–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1904). Meinong’s theory of complexes and assumptions. Mind, New Series, 13(51), 336–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., & Beilock, S. L. (2009). Multiple social identities and stereotype threat: Imbalance, accessibility, and working memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sean, C., Draine, S. C., & Greenwald, A. G. (1996). Modeling unconscious gender bias in fame judgments: Finding the proper branch of the correct (multinomial) tree. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 221–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, B., & Harman, G. (2011). Knowledge and assumptions. Philosophical Studies, 156(2011), 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shutts, K., Banaji, M. R., & Spelke, E. S. (2010). Social categories guide young children’s preferences for novel objects. Developmental Science, 13(4), 599–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, E. (1974). How do you know? American Philosophical Quarterly, 11(2), 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (Eds.). (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat (Vol. 34, pp. 379–440). San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe, E. H., & Smithson, J. (2001). Making gender relevant: Conversation analysis and gender categories in interaction. Discourse & Society, 12(2), 217–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trachman, M., & Bluestone, C. (2005). What’s love got to do with it? College Teaching, 53(4), 131–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trix, F., & Psenka, C. (2003). Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse & Society, 14(2), 191–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman-Margalit, E. (1983). On presumption. The Journal of Philosophy, 80(3), 143–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valian, V. (1999). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valian, V. (2004). Beyond gender schemas: Improving the advancement of women in academia. Hypatia, 20(3), 198–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaman, M. H. & Rabbi, R. E. (2010). What are the descriptive assumptions in critical reading? Retrieved December 12, 2011 from http://criticalreadingsblogspot.com.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Apollo M. Nkwake .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nkwake, A.M. (2013). What are Assumptions?. In: Working with Assumptions in International Development Program Evaluation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4797-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics