Abstract
Although the pertinence of implicit assumptions is underlined in theory-based evaluations, the nature of these assumptions has been rarely discussed. To understand the nature of underlying assumptions, it is necessary to review the notion of assumptions in general and its remarkable role in the generation of knowledge. This chapter discusses the nature of assumptions and groups in 10 categories of assumptions according to Brookfield’s (Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1995) typology: Paradigmatic, Prescriptive and Causal assumptions and according to the degree of articulation.
Even the most well-intentioned person unwittingly allows unconscious thoughts and feelings to influence apparently objective decisions
Banaji, M. N. in Fine and Handelsman 2006, p. 1
Every human society rests on assumptions that, most of the time, are not only unchallenged but not even reflected upon. In other words, in every society there are patterns of thought that most people accept without question as being of the very nature of things
Trachman and Bluestone 2005, p. 131
To deny a proposition is not the same as to confirm its denial. …Given a proposition P, there is an associated proposition not-P. Either of these…may be merely supported or assumed. But when we deny P, we are not concerned with mere assumption, and there is nothing to be done with P that is logically equivalent to assuming not-P….the state of mind in which we reject a proposition is not the same as that in which we accept its negation
Russell 1904, p. 336
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akalis, S. A., Banaji, M. R., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2008). Crime alert! How thinking about a single suspect automatically shifts stereotypes toward an entire group du bois review. Social Science Research on Race, 5(2), 217–233.
Banaji, M. R., & Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7(3), 136–141.
Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (1994). Implicit stereotyping and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 17, pp. 55–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bennett, G. E. (1933). Assumptions. The Accounting Review, 8(2), 157–159.
Bernardo, A. E., Talley, E., & Welch, I. (2000). A theory of legal presumptions. Economics and Law, 16(1), 1–49.
Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(3), 242–261.
Blair, I. V., Jennifer, E. M., & Lenton, A. P. (2001). Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 828–841.
Buchner, A., & Wippich, W. (1996). Unconscious gender bias in fame judgments? Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 197–220.
Cowgill, D. O. (1964). Value assumptions in recent research on migration. International Migration Digest, 1(1), 29–33.
Conley, F. K. (1998). Walking out on the boys. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 276–287.
Eliot, T. D. (1937). Reactions to predictive assumptions. American Sociological Review, 2(4), 508–517.
Ennis, R. H. (1982). Identifying implicit assumptions. Synthese, 51(1), 61–86.
Fine, E., & Handelsman, J. (2006). Reviewing applicants: Research on bias and assumptions. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
Fogarty, R. J. (1994). How to teach metacognitive reflection. New York: Corwin.
Fried, L. P., Francomano, C. A., MacDonald, S. M., Wagner, E. M., Stokes, E. J., Carbone, K. M., et al. (1996). Career development for women in academic medicine: Multiple interventions in a department of medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 898–905.
Harste, J. C., Woodward, V. A., & Burke, C. L. (1984). Examining our assumptions: A transactional view of literacy and learning. Research in the Teaching of English, 18(1), 84–108.
Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216.
Good, C., Aronson, J., & Harder, J. A. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women’s achievement in high-level math courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(1), 17–28.
Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 416–427.
Kanazawa, S. (1988). In defense of unrealistic assumptions. Sociological Theory, 16(2), 193–204.
Kies, D. (1995). Assumptions. Retrieved December 20, 2011 from http://papyr.com/hypertextbooks/comp2/assume.htm.
Kotze, D. A. (1987). Contradictions and assumptions in community development. Community Development Journal, 22(1), 31–36.
Mingers, J. A. (2003). Classification of the philosophical assumptions of management science. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(6), 559–570.
Niemeyer, G. (1955). A query about assumptions on international organization. World Politics, 7(2), 337–347.
Read, S. (2003). Freeing assumptions from the Liar paradox. Analysis, 63(2), 162–166.
Russell, B. (1904). Meinong’s theory of complexes and assumptions. Mind, New Series, 13(51), 336–354.
Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., & Beilock, S. L. (2009). Multiple social identities and stereotype threat: Imbalance, accessibility, and working memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 949.
Sean, C., Draine, S. C., & Greenwald, A. G. (1996). Modeling unconscious gender bias in fame judgments: Finding the proper branch of the correct (multinomial) tree. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 221–225.
Sherman, B., & Harman, G. (2011). Knowledge and assumptions. Philosophical Studies, 156(2011), 131–140.
Shutts, K., Banaji, M. R., & Spelke, E. S. (2010). Social categories guide young children’s preferences for novel objects. Developmental Science, 13(4), 599–610.
Sosa, E. (1974). How do you know? American Philosophical Quarterly, 11(2), 113–122.
Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (Eds.). (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat (Vol. 34, pp. 379–440). San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.
Stokoe, E. H., & Smithson, J. (2001). Making gender relevant: Conversation analysis and gender categories in interaction. Discourse & Society, 12(2), 217–244.
Trachman, M., & Bluestone, C. (2005). What’s love got to do with it? College Teaching, 53(4), 131–136.
Trix, F., & Psenka, C. (2003). Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse & Society, 14(2), 191–220.
Ullman-Margalit, E. (1983). On presumption. The Journal of Philosophy, 80(3), 143–163.
Valian, V. (1999). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Valian, V. (2004). Beyond gender schemas: Improving the advancement of women in academia. Hypatia, 20(3), 198–213.
Zaman, M. H. & Rabbi, R. E. (2010). What are the descriptive assumptions in critical reading? Retrieved December 12, 2011 from http://criticalreadingsblogspot.com.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nkwake, A.M. (2013). What are Assumptions?. In: Working with Assumptions in International Development Program Evaluation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4797-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4797-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4796-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4797-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)