Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Astrophysics and Space Science Library ((ASSL,volume 394))

  • 2215 Accesses

Abstract

Einstein’s deduction of the time dilation was possibility the most difficult idea for both scientists and the lay public to fathom. It led to what was perceived by some as a paradox – usually called the clock paradox or the twin paradox. Before this paradox was invented, Einstein presented his interpretation of the time dilation in a lecture in Zürich in January 1911 (note the title): “The Theory of Relativity.” He spoke of the time dilation as both “peculiar” (a term he used before), and as “funny,” for if a clock moved near the speed of light and returned to its place of origin, the hands of the clock hardly moved compared to an identical clock at rest at the place of origin. More importantly, he made it clear that his interpretation inferred not only that the clock slowed down proportional to its speed but time itself proceeded more slowly, so that “a living organism” aged at a slower rate than one at rest. Here he explicitly affirmed what was implied in 1905 – that time itself, not just the ticking of clocks, changed. Einstein’s published lecture, however, was not widely read.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Einstein Papers, Vol. 3, Doc. 17, pp. 340–350 ET.

  2. 2.

     “Am drolligsten wird die Sache…,” Einstein Papers, Vol. 3, Doc. 17, p. 436.

  3. 3.

    Einstein Papers, Vol. 3, Doc. 17, pp. 348–349 ET. See also Galison [75], pp. 266–267.

  4. 4.

     (1872–1946).

  5. 5.

     But Einstein’s theory prohibits reaching light-speed; as well, Langevin’s example has the time dilation to be the ratio of 2/200 years, or Q  =  1/100. Working backwards from this, I calculate the speed of his traveler as 99.994999 % of c, to six decimal places.

  6. 6.

     Miller [143], p. 244.

  7. 7.

     Miller [143], p, 248.

  8. 8.

     As Miller has pointed out: “The literature on the clock paradox is voluminous, and increases daily” (Miller [143], 257); as such, we will not pursue this topic, beyond its relevance in Einstein’s life, as in the next chapter.

References

  1. Galison, Peter L. 2003. Einstein’s clocks, poincaré’s maps: empires of time. New York: W. W. Norton.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller, Arthur I. 1998. Albert Einstein’s special theory of relativity: emergence (1905) and early interpretation (1905–1911). Republished edition; original 1981. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Topper, D.R. (2013). 1911: The Paradox About Time. In: How Einstein Created Relativity out of Physics and Astronomy. Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol 394. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4782-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4782-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4781-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4782-5

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics