Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Astrophysics and Space Science Library ((ASSL,volume 394))

Abstract

In a brilliant piece of historical sleuthing Peter Galison placed Einstein’s 1905 analysis of the simultaneity of time in its cultural context. In particular, he showed how Einstein’s work at the Patent office spilled over into his physics research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

     Galison [74, 75].

  2. 2.

     Galison [76], p. 69.

  3. 3.

     Galison [74], p. 385; Galison [75], pp. 255–256.

  4. 4.

     Galison [74], p. 389.

  5. 5.

     (1854–1912).

  6. 6.

     Galison [75], pp. 211–212.

  7. 7.

     Poincaré [168] [1902].

  8. 8.

     Solovine, in his introduction to Einstein’s letters, says that this book “engrossed us and held us spellbound for weeks ….” Einstein [54], p. 9.

  9. 9.

     Poincaré [167] [1904].

  10. 10.

     Whittaker [210] [1953]. See Chap. 2, especially pp. 30–31, on the 1904 lecture. Interestingly, Whittaker was the author of Einstein’s obituary-biography for the Royal Society, where he repeated his claim. Whittaker [208], pp. 40–43.

  11. 11.

     Miller [143], p. 172 in the 1981 edition; Galison [74], p. 374; and Dyson [36].

  12. 12.

     In his 1905 letter to Habicht; Einstein Papers, Vol. 5, Docs. 27 and 28.

  13. 13.

     The claim against Einstein’s originality has recently been raised by some ultra-conservative American groups. See Chap. 16.

  14. 14.

     Galison [75], pp. 253–255; Fölsing [65], pp. 155–156; Abiko [1], p. 14; Editorial Note: “Einstein on the Theory of Relativity,” Einstein Papers, Vol.2, pp. 253–274, see p. 264.

  15. 15.

     Quoted in Abiko [1], p. 14, although I acknowledge the limitations of this as an exact translation of Einstein’s Kyoto lecture of 1922. See previous comments on this source, above, regarding the Michelson-Morley experiment.

  16. 16.

     Einstein (1905), quoted in Stachel [191], p. 159.

  17. 17.

     Einstein, 1919/20, quoted in Moszkowski [147], p. 4.

  18. 18.

     Von Laue (1879–1960) was a student assistant to Planck and learnt of relativity through him. (As noted in a footnote above, Planck was the referee for the relativity paper in the Annalen.) Von Laue once went to Bern to speak with Einstein about relativity, and was surprised to see they were the same age. They remained friends thereafter. He later wrote a further book on general relativity. For Von Laue’s first book on special relativity, Das Relativitätsprinzip, see Staley [193], pp. 334–339.

  19. 19.

    Raum und Zeit, in German; Minkowski [146].

  20. 20.

     (1864–1909).

  21. 21.

     Clark [26], p. 157; Isaacson [109], p. 35.

  22. 22.

    Einstein Papers, Vol. 2, Doc. 47, pp. 258–261 ET.

  23. 23.

    Selbständigkeit, in German; in Minkowski [146], p. 75.

  24. 24.

     Galison [73], pp. 97–99.

  25. 25.

     Walter Kaufmann, whose experiments on moving electrons were discussed above, held such a view. As he rhetorically put it: “Instead of all the fruitless attempts to explain electric phenomena mechanically, can we not try conversely to reduce mechanics to electrical processes?” Quoted in Holton [98], p. 4.

  26. 26.

     Minkowski [146], p. 83.

  27. 27.

     Walter [206], pp. 67–78. Walter’s thesis needs to be qualified by Staley’s work (mentioned below) showing how relativity was seen as a part of the theory of the electron from about 1905, and hence was more widely know because of it. Staley [193], Chaps. 6, Chaps. 6, and 7.

  28. 28.

     Quoted in Sommerfeld [189], p. 102. This is obviously a later recollection of Sommerfeld.

  29. 29.

     For more on the relationship between Einstein and Minkowski, see Pyenson [169], especially pp. 80–81, 94–96, and 145–154.

  30. 30.

     Hoffmann [97], p. 87.

  31. 31.

    Einstein Papers, Vol. 5, Doc. 374, p. 275 ET.

  32. 32.

    Einstein Papers, Vol. 5, Doc. 374. This is the English translation used in the Einstein papers for tintenscheisserei, which literally is “ink-shiting.”

  33. 33.

    Einstein Papers, Vol. 5, Doc. 374, p. 275 ET.

  34. 34.

     Stachel [192], p. 237.

  35. 35.

     Klein [116], pp. 175–179.

  36. 36.

     Einstein [46] [1933], p. 215.

  37. 37.

     Feuer [62], pp. xii–xix.

  38. 38.

     Kafka was not a famous writer until after his death, since little was published during his life. I am not aware of any documented interaction between Kafka and Einstein within or beyond the Prague group.

  39. 39.

     See also Frank [67], pp. 83–85.

  40. 40.

     Solovine lists this book and other authors, such as Mach and Poincaré, along with Dickens and Cervantes’ Don Quixote, in his introduction to the letters from Einstein. In Einstein [54], pp. 8–9.

  41. 41.

     Neffe [149], p. 311. In some ways this issue comes down to how one translates the phrase from the letter of September 8, 1916: “eine mittelalterlich anmutende Kleine Schar weltferner Menschen.” Einstein Papers, Vol. 8A, Doc. 257. Neffe’s translation is that found in the ET for the Papers. Interestingly, in an essay on “The Jewish Question” in the Einstein Papers, Vol. 7, pp. 221–236, written by the editors of that volume, they translate the same phrase of 1916 less dismissively as “a small band of impractical people that strike one as medieval.” Another similar translation is the following from the Born letters (Einstein [56], p. 4): “a medieval-like band of unworldly people.” The latter translations are more accommodating to Feuer’s thesis. Surely, words like “unworldly” and “impractical” could apply to Einstein himself at times.

  42. 42.

     Frank [67], pp. 77–85, especially pp. 83–85.

  43. 43.

     Frank [67], p. 98.

  44. 44.

     Technically there were three positions. A professorship, without teaching duties, at the University of Berlin; a research position and membership in the Prussian Academy of Science; and a Directorship of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Physics, the latter was not established until 1917.

  45. 45.

     There was also the teaching and tutoring episode before the Patent job, where I quoted above (Chap. 3) from a 1901 letter saying he found teaching “exceptionally” pleasing.

  46. 46.

     Marić, [136] [Winter 1909/1910], p. 101.

  47. 47.

     Neffe [149], p. 159; Clark [26], pp. 170–171.

  48. 48.

     Frank [67], pp. 89–91 and 116–119.

References

  1. Abiko, Seiya. 2000. Einstein’s Kyoto address: ‘how I created the theory of relativity. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 31(pt.1): 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clark, Ronald W. 1971. Einstein: the life and times. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dyson, Freeman. 2003. Clockwork science. New York Review of Books (November 6), 42–44. This is an essay review of Peter Galison’s Einstein’s Clocks, Poincaré’s Maps, below.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Einstein, Albert. 1950b. Out of my later years. No translator cited. New York: The Wisdom Library. This is a collection of essays from 1934 to 1950. It is a second (companion) anthology to The World as I See It, 1949b.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Einstein, Albert. 1986. Letters to Solovine. Introduction by Maurice Solovine (Trans: Wade Baskin.). New York: Philosophical Library. This useful volume contains almost all the original German photocopies (or otherwise German transcripts) along with the English translations.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Einstein, Albert. 2005. The Born-Einstein letters: friendship, politics and physics in uncertain times (trans: Irene Born.). New York: Macmillan. This is a collection of correspondence between Einstein and Max and Hedwig Born from 1916 to 1955, with commentaries by Max Born.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fölsing, Albrecht. 1997. Albert Einstein: a biography (trans: Ewald Osers.). New York: Viking. Originally published in German in 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frank, Philipp. 1947. Einstein: his life and times (Trans: George Rosen.). Edited and revised by Shuichi Kusaka. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Galison, Peter L. 1979. Minkowski’s space-time: from visual thinking to the absolute world. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 10: 85–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Galison, Peter L. 2000. Einstein’s clocks: the place of time. Critical Inquiry 26(2): 355–389 (winter).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Galison, Peter L. 2003. Einstein’s clocks, poincaré’s maps: empires of time. New York: W. W. Norton.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Galison, Peter L. 2004. Einstein’s compass. Scientific American 291(3): 66–69 (September).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoffmann, Banesh. 1972. Albert Einstein: creator and rebel. New York: New American Library.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Holton, Gerald. 1981. Einstein’s search for the weltbild. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 125(1): 1–15 (February).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Isaacson, Walter. 2007. Einstein: his life and universe. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Klein, Martin J. 1970a. Paul Ehrenfest: volume I: the making of a theoretical physicist. New York/Amsterdam: North-Holland. Klein died before completing volume two. Sheilla Jones (Jones, 2008) told me that in speaking with Klein on why the second volume was never written, he implied that he was psychologically blocked because of having to confront Ehrenfest’s suicide and murder of his son.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marić, Mileva. 2003. In Albert’s shadow: the life and letters of Mileva Marić, ed. Milan Popović. Translated from the Serbian and German by Boško Milosavljević and Branimir Živojinović. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miller, Arthur I. 1998. Albert Einstein’s special theory of relativity: emergence (1905) and early interpretation (1905–1911). Republished edition; original 1981. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Minkowski, Hermann. 1908. Space and time, reprinted in Einstein et al. 1923, The Principle of Relativity, 73–96.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moszkowski, Alexander. 1970. Conversations with Einstein (trans: Henry L. Brose.). New York: Horizon Press. Originally published in German in 1921. This book is based on a series of interviews by the author from the summer of 1919 to the autumn of 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Neffe, Jürgen. 2007. Einstein: a biography. (trans: Shelley Frisch) from the 2005 German edition. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Poincaré, Henri. 1905. The principles of mathematical physics. The Monist 15(1): 1–24 (January). This is an English translation of the 1904 lecture delivered in St. Louis.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Poincaré, Henri. 1952. Science and hypothesis. New York: Dover. This is a reprint of the 1905 English translation of the French edition of 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pyenson, Lewis. 1985. The young Einstein: the advent of relativity. Bristol/Boston: Adam Hilger Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sommerfeld, Arnold. 1949. To Albert Einstein’s seventieth birthday. In Schilpp (ed.), 1949, above, Volume 1, 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stachel, John (ed.). 1998. Einstein’s miraculous year: five papers that changed the face of physics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. I use, and cite, this book for the most recent translations of Einstein’s 1905 papers.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stachel, John. 2002. Einstein from ‘B’ to ‘Z’. Boston/Basel/Berlin: Birkhäuser. This is Volume Nine in the Einstein Studies series.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Staley, Richard. 2008. Einstein’s generation: the origins of the relativity revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. This important book sets Einstein’s work within the larger context of the cultural, social, intellectual, material, theoretical, and experimental framework of his times, purposefully tempering the great man approach to science history. In light of – or, perhaps, in spite of – Staley’s thesis, the title of this book was deliberately and carefully wrought.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Walter, Scott. 1999. Minkowski, mathematicians, and the mathematical theory of relativity.In The Expanding Worlds of General Relativity, ed. H. Goenner, and J. Renn, et al. Boston/Basel/Berlin: Birkhäuser. This is Volume Seven in the Einstein Studies series.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Whittaker, Edmund. 1955. Albert Einstein, 1879–1955. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 37–67.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Whittaker, Edmund. 1960b. A history of the theories of aether and electricity, volume II: the modern theories, 1900–1926. New York: Harper Torchbook. This was originally published in 1953. Relativity is covered in Chapter II, with the title: “The Relativity Theory of Poincaré and Lorentz,” which betrays Whittaker’s anti-Einstein bias.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Topper, D.R. (2013). From Railroad Time to Space-Time. In: How Einstein Created Relativity out of Physics and Astronomy. Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol 394. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4782-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4782-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4781-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4782-5

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics