Abstract
The essential predictions of general relativity are:
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Will [211], pp. 772–773.
- 2.
Will [212], pp. 50–54.
- 3.
Will [211], pp. 771–772.
- 4.
Yam [217], pp. 53–55.
- 5.
I have added to the diagram the case of a body in orbit, which does not appear in Newton’s original sketch. The diagram and the experiment, along with some historiographical challenges, are discussed in considerable detail in Topper [198], Chap. 10.
- 6.
Will [212], p. 271.
- 7.
See Calder [23], p. 158, who introduced me to the idea of interpreting the CERN experiment in this way.
References
Calder, Nigel. 1983. Einstein’s universe: a guide to the theory of relativity. New York: Penguin Books.
Topper, David R. 2007. Quirky sides of scientists: true tales of ingenuity and error in physics and astronomy. New York: Springer.
Will, Clifford M. 1990. General relativity at 75: how right was Einstein? Science 250: 770–776 (November).
Will, Clifford M. 1993. Was Einstein right?: putting general relativity to the test, 2nd ed. New York: Basic Books.
Yam, Philip. 2004. Everyday Einstein. Scientific American 291(3): 50–55 (September).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Topper, D.R. (2013). Is the Theory True Today?. In: How Einstein Created Relativity out of Physics and Astronomy. Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol 394. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4782-5_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4782-5_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4781-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4782-5
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)