Skip to main content

Teaching Engineering Design with Digital Fabrication: Imagining, Creating, and Refining Ideas

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emerging Technologies for the Classroom

Abstract

Digital fabrication uses next-generation computer-controlled manufacturing systems to translate electronic designs into 2D and 3D physical objects. Advances in technology are making educational applications and classroom use of digital fabrication increasingly feasible. The combination of digital fabrication with engineering design integrates mathematics, science, and engineering concepts into a highly motivating context. Students can use digital fabricators to quickly prototype ideas and create sophisticated designs that satisfy mathematics- and science-based criteria and constraints, encouraging students to imagine, invent, collaborate, and construct solutions to complex and authentic problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ainsworth, S. E. (1999). A functional taxonomy of multiple representations. Computers in Education, 33, 131–152. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00029-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akins, L., & Burghardt, D. (2006). Improving K-12 mathematics understanding with engineering design projects. Paper presented at the 36th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, G., & Groves, J. (2009). The democratization of production. Learning & Leading with Technology, 37(3), 36–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, G., & Stearns, P. (2011). Desktop manufacturing and children’s engineering in the elementary classroom. Paper presented at the annual international society for technology in education conference, Philadelphia, PA, June 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, D. (2011). Engineering and education—creating 21st century students. Paper presented at the Curry School of Education and School of Engineering and Applied Sciences series, Charlottesville, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, D., & Hacker, M. (2008). Development of a math infusion model for middle school engineering/technology education. Paper presented at the 38th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference, Saratoga, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, M. D., & Krowles, C. (2006). Enhancing mathematics instruction with engineering design. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education annual conference, Chicago, IL. Retrieved August 12th, 2012 from http://search.asee.org/search/fetch;jsessionid=76m147hl9rhtt?url=file%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%2FE%3A%2Fsearch%2Fconference%2F12%2F2006Full868.pdf&index=conference_papers&space=129746797203605791716676178&type=application%2Fpdf&charset=

  • Chiu, J., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Self-assessment and self-explanation for learning chemistry using dynamic molecular visualizations. In P. A. Kirschner, F. Prins, V. Jonker, & G. Kanselaar (Eds.), International perspectives in the learning sciences: Cre8ting a learning world. Proceedings of the 8th international conference of the learning sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 16–17). Utrecht, The Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, J. L. (2010). Developing students’ criteria for visualizations by prompting judgments of fidelity. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Learning in the disciplines: Proceedings of the 9th international conference of the learning sciences (Vol. 2, p. 230). Chicago, IL: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crismond, D. (2001). Learning and using science ideas when doing investigate-and-redesign tasks: A study of, naïve, novice, and expert designers doing constrained and scaffolded design work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 791–820. doi: 10.1002/tea.1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dym, C., Agogino, A., Eris, O., Frey, D., & Leifer, L. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 103–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershenfeld, N. (2005). Fab: The coming revolution on your desktop—from personal computers to personal fabrication. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1991). Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffler, T., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animations versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 722–738. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y., & Resnick, M. (Eds.). (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, J., & Burghardt, D. (2002). Design technology in the elementary school: A study of teacher action research. Journal of Technology Education, 13(2), 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., et al. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school classroom: Putting learning by design into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 495–547. doi: 10.1207/S15327809JLS1204_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachapelle, C. P., Cunningham, C. M., Jocz, J., Kay, A. E., Phadnis, P., & Sullivan, S. (2011). Engineering is elementary: An evaluation of year 6 field testing. Paper presented at the NARST annual international conference, Orlando, FL. Retrieved from http://www.mos.org/eie/research_assessment.php

  • Lowe, R. (2004). Interrogation of a dynamic visualization during learning. Learning and Instruction, 14, 257–274. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maletsky, L. P., & Hale, R. D. (2003). The practical integration of rapid prototyping technology into engineering curricula. Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Midwest section meeting. Rolla, MO: American Society for Engineering Education. Retrieved from web.mst.edu/∼asee/Papers/23%20Maletsky%20Rapid%20Prototyping.pdf

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Engineering. (2010). Standards for K-12 engineering education? Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). P21 framework definitions. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdf

  • Sadler, P. M., Coyle, H. P., & Schwartz, M. (2000). Engineering competitions in the middle school classroom: Key elements in developing effective design challenges. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 299–327. doi: 10.1207/S15327809JLS0903_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnittka, C., & Bell, R. (2011). Engineering design and conceptual change in science: Addressing thermal energy and heat transfer in eighth grade. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1861–1887. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.529177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamper, R. E., & Decker, D. L. (2000). Utilizing rapid prototyping to enhance undergraduate engineering education. Paper presented at the 30th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference, Kansas City, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Printed World. (2011). The economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/18114221

  • Weinberg, M. (2010). It will be awesome if they don’t screw it up: 3D printing, intellectual property and the fight over the next great disruptive technology. Retrieved from http://www.publicknowledge.org/it-will-be-awesome-if-they-dont-screw-it-up

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF. The authors appreciate helpful comments from the University of Virginia Children’s Engineering research group and thank the teachers and students involved in the projects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer L. Chiu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chiu, J.L., Bull, G., Berry, R.Q., Kjellstrom, W.R. (2013). Teaching Engineering Design with Digital Fabrication: Imagining, Creating, and Refining Ideas. In: Mouza, C., Lavigne, N. (eds) Emerging Technologies for the Classroom. Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4696-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics