Skip to main content

Highly Sensitive Pharmaceutical and Clinical Analysis Using Selective Solid-Phase Extraction Coupled to Microflow Liquid Chromatography and Isotope-Dilution Mass Spectrometry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
LC-MS in Drug Bioanalysis

Abstract

The capacity of ultrasensitive quantification is highly desirable in many clinical and pharmaceutical applications, such as the PK study of low-dose administration and quantification of low-abundance markers in circulating systems. Nonetheless, this task is highly challenging even for a LC-MS/MS approach, due to the extremely low levels of analytes and the highly complex matrices. Here we describe a robust method for the ultrasensitive quantification of therapeutic agents or clinical markers in highly complex biological systems. This is achieved by the combination of a selective solid-phase extraction (SPE) with a highly sensitive capillary LC (μLC)-MS/MS analysis. Comparing to a conventional LC-MS/MS, a μLC-MS/MS provides much higher sensitivity due to the lower peak dilution. SPE washing and elution conditions were optimized so that target drugs are selectively extracted from the biological matrix. By eliminating most undesirable matrix components, this selective SPE procedure enabled a high sample loading volume on the μLC column without compromising chromatographic performance and operational robustness, and helped to achieve ultralow detection limits. Sufficient μLC separation was employed in order to further improve analytical sensitivity and to decrease matrix effects. To show the application of this strategy, three paradigms, respectively, the quantifications of (1) corticosteroids after an intravitreous injection, (2) an anticancer agent after a low-dose treatment, and (3) several vitamin D (VitD) metabolites in plasma, are introduced in this chapter. Typically, low pg/mL LOQ were achieved, and the linearity, accuracy, and precision of these developed methods were excellent.

Collectively, this strategy enables the ultrasensitive, accurate, and robust LC-MS-based quantification of extremely low levels of drug/markers in biological samples, which were previously approachable only by ELISA or RIA methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Vissers JPC, Claessens HA, Cramers CA (1997) J Chromatogr A 779:1–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilm M, Shevchenko A, Houthaeve T, Breit S, Schweigerer L, Fotsis T, Mann M (1996) Nature 379:466–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Emmett MR, Caprioli RM (1994) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 5:605–613

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Qu J, Qu Y, Straubinger RM (2007) Anal Chem 79:3786–3793

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu HY, Straubinger RM, Cao J, Wang H, Qu J (2008) J Chromatogr A 1210:160–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Duan XT, Weinstock-Guttman B, Wang H, Bang EJ, Li J, Ramanathan M, Qu J (2010) Anal Chem 82:2488–2497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Qu J, Wang YM, Luo GA (2001) J Chromatogr A 919:437–441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Olsen TW, Feng X, Warner K, Conston SR, Sierra DH, Folden DV, Smith ME, Cameron JD (2006) Am J Ophthalmol 142:777–787

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Beer PM, Bakri SJ, Singh RJ, Liu WG, Peters GB, Miller M (2003) Ophthalmology 110:681–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alexander MS, Kiser MM, Culley T, Kern JR, Dolan JW, McChesney JD, Zygmunt J, Bannister SJ (2003) J Chromatogr B 785:253–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar GN, Walle UK, Bhalla KN, Walle T (1993) Res Commun Chem Pathol 80:337–344

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuh HJ, Jang SH, Wientjes MG, Au JLS (2000) J Pharmacol Exp Ther 293:761–770

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaspar JR, Qu J, Straubinger NL, Straubinger RM (2008) Analyst 133:1742–1748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Saito Y, Jinno K, Greibrokk T (2004) J Sep Sci 27:1379–1390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stokvis E, Ouwehand M, Nan LGAH, Kemper EM, van Tellingen O, Rosing H, Beijnen JH (2004) J Mass Spectrom 39:1506–1512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Parise RA, Ramanathan RK, Zamboni WC, Egorin MJ (2003) J Chromatogr B 783:231–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hou WY, Watters JW, McLeod HL (2004) J Chromatogr B 804:263–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Grozav AG, Hutson TE, Zhou X, Bukowski RM, Ganapathi R, Xu Y (2004) J Pharm Biomed 36:125–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Guo W, Johnson JL, Khan S, Ahmad A, Ahmad I (2005) Anal Biochem 336:213–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang LZ, Goh BC, Grigg ME, Lee SC, Khoo YM, Lee HS (2003) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 17:1548–1552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gustafson DL, Long ME, Zirrolli JA, Duncan MW, Holden SN, Pierson AS, Eckhardt SG (2003) Cancer Chemother Pharm 52:159–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Smolders J, Damoiseaux J, Menheere P, Hupperts R (2008) J Neuroimmunol 194:7–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Houghton LA, Vieth R (2006) Am J Clin Nutr 84:694–697

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zerwekh JE (2008) Am J Clin Nutr 87:1087s–1091s

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Norman AW, Okamura WH, Farachcarson MC, Allewaert K, Branisteanu D, Nemere I, Muralidharan KR, Bouillon R (1993) J Biol Chem 268:13811–13819

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Seo EG, Norman AW (1997) J Bone Miner Res 12:598–606

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Carter GD (2009) Clin Chem 55:1300–1302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Roth HJ, Schmidt-Gayk H, Weber H, Niederau C (2008) Ann Clin Biochem 45:153–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Haddad JG (1971) J Clin Endocr Metab 33:992–995

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jones G (1978) Clin Chem 24:287–298

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Khatri BO (2000) Ther Apher Off J Int Soc Apher Jpn Soc Apher 4:263–270

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Munger KL, Levin LI, Hollis BW, Howard NS, Ascherio A (2006) JAMA 296:2832–2838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Qu Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yu, H., Duan, X., Qu, J. (2012). Highly Sensitive Pharmaceutical and Clinical Analysis Using Selective Solid-Phase Extraction Coupled to Microflow Liquid Chromatography and Isotope-Dilution Mass Spectrometry. In: Xu, Q., Madden, T. (eds) LC-MS in Drug Bioanalysis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3828-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics