Skip to main content

Organizing OSCEs (and Other SP Exercises) in Ten Steps

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Objective Structured Clinical Examinations

Abstract

Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) and other SP projects can be a major undertaking, and as with most other educational projects, collaboration within and across specialties, even across disciplines can only enrich the process. While it is necessary to have strong leaders who believe in the benefits of such comprehensive assessment programs, many other individuals are needed for adequate planning, preparation, and implementation. Table 2.1 details the different roles that OSCEs typically require. Some people may be able to hold multiple roles (e.g., SP and rater) and some roles may be shared among several individuals (e.g., co-leadership). There will be a need for a “core team” (e.g., OSCE committee) that is responsible for planning and development in advance of the OSCE dates. Participating in such a team provides an opportunity to engage young, upcoming, enthusiastic faculty. Others may be involved only in the implementation phase of the OSCE (e.g., raters). Regularly scheduled meetings can help the committee become more established. After the actual OSCE, the group can work on data interpretation and dissemination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boulet JR, De Champlain AF, McKinley DW. Setting defensible performance standards on OSCEs and standardized patient examinations. Med Teach. 2003;25:245–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Downing SA, Tekian A, Yudkowsky R. Procedures for establishing defensible absolute passing scores on performance examinations in health professions education. Teach Learn Med. 2006;18:50–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchett P, Haun C, Goldenhar L. Training standardized patients to give feedback to medical trainees: The state of the art. ASPE Project Awards, 2004. Available online at: www.aspeducators.org/aspe-project-awards.php. Accessed 1 Apr 2012.

  • Kachur EK, Green S, Dennis C. Written comments on Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) rating forms: an exploratory study. Teach Learn Med. 1990;2:225–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalet A, Earp JA, Kowlowitz V. How well do faculty evaluate the interviewing skills of medical students? J Gen Intern Med. 1992;7(5):499–505.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kilminster S, Roberts T. Standard setting for OSCEs: trial of borderline approach. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2004;9:201–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krumer A, Muijijens A, Jansen K, Dusman H, Tan L, van der Vleuten C. Comparison of a rational and an empirical standard setting procedure for an OSCE. Med Educ. 2003;37:132–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newble DI, Hoare J, Sheldrake PF. The selection and training of examiners for clinical examinations. Med Educ. 1980;14:345–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norcini J, Anderson B, Bollela V, Burch V, Costa MJ, Duvivier R, Galbraith R, Hays R, Kent A, Perrott V, Roberts T. Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 conference. Med Teach. 2011;33:206–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poenaru D, Morales D, Richards A, O'Connor HM. Running an objective structured clinical examination on a shoestring budget. Am J Surg. 1997;173:538–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reznick RK, Smee S, Baumber JS, Cohen R, Rothman A, Blackmore D, Berard M. Guidelines for estimating the real cost of an objective structured clinical examination. Acad Med. 1993;68:513–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler DR. Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Asses Eval High Educ. 2005;30:175–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman J, Kurtz S, Draper JH. Skills for communicating with patients. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Radcliffe Publishing; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamblyn RM, Klass DJ, Schnabl GK, Kopelow ML. The accuracy of standardized patient presentation. Med Educ. 1991;25:100–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace P. Coaching standardized patients for Use in the assessment of clinical competence. New York: Springer; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayne State School of Medicine Standardized Patient Program. Case Development Blueprint. Wayne State School of Medicine, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sondra Zabar M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kachur, E.K., Zabar, S., Hanley, K., Kalet, A., Bruno, J.H., Gillespie, C.C. (2012). Organizing OSCEs (and Other SP Exercises) in Ten Steps. In: Zabar, S., Kachur, E., Kalet, A., Hanley, K. (eds) Objective Structured Clinical Examinations. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3749-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3749-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3748-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3749-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics