Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cultural Differences Across and Within Countries: Emerging Economies Matter

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cross-Cultural Knowledge Management

Part of the book series: Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management ((ITKM,volume 11))

  • 2179 Accesses

Abstract

While acknowledging the contributions of IO and RBV, international business (IB) and international management (IM) analysts have emphasized the significance of social, political, cultural, economic, and institutional differences across countries and have asserted that countries recognize the importance of giving account of the behavioral and performance fluctuations of multinational corporations (MNCs).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    From an organizational learning standpoint, Ghoshal (1987), Huber (1991), and Zhang et al. (2010) claim that two elements are fundamental for the real occurrence of FDI spillovers: domestic firms’ opportunity to learn from foreign firms and domestic firms’ capacity to learn from foreign firms. The local firms’ opportunity to learn may be enhanced by the variety of FDI country origins because domestic firms are exposed to different systems of technologies, management practices, and cultural values that foreign firms from various origins bring: positive spillover effects will come as a natural consequence. Moreover, the local firms’ capacity to learn from FDI determines the effect of the variety of FDI country origins on the productivity of local firms. If local firms manage to better assimilate the knowledge and techniques brought by foreign firms, such effect will be more intense.

  2. 2.

    See Chap. 7.

  3. 3.

    The RBV and TCE provide different theoretical lenses to analyze entry strategies. They are based on different assumptions about the nature of economic actors, and therefore point to different conclusions regarding optimal firm behavior (Leiblein 2003). Yet, they complement each other in explaining mode choice and its underlying motives of cost efficiency and value creation. The unit of analysis is the firm in RBV, but the transaction in TCE. With RBV we analyze which mode of entry is most suitable to exploit and augment the existing resource base of the firm. Meyer et al. (2009) framework thus considers operations from a firm-level perspective, while TCE-based models require the isolation of a specific transaction. Joint consideration of multiple activities reflects interdependence and knowledge flows between units of the same firm. Entry modes may be chosen to enhance the knowledge base, for instance, by creating learning opportunities, rather than to optimize each transaction in isolation, an effect missed using transactions as the unit of analysis. A second difference is that Meyer et al. framework focuses on resource augmentation as a distinguishing criterion of entry modes, whereas TCE-based frameworks focus on control. Many TCE-based studies focus on integration vs. contracting out decisions, and emphasize asset specificity, opportunism, and uncertainty. Yet, evidence on the role of uncertainty in the TCE framework is inconclusive (Carter and Hodgson, 2006), while it is controversial whether opportunism is necessary to explain market failure (Kogut and Zander, 1993; Love 1995; Conner and Prahalad, 1996). Knowledge-intensive firms generally attain competitive advantages by combining different types of knowledge held at different levels of the organization (Brown and Duguid, 2001), and “communities of practice” may be essential to facilitate this sharing and combining of knowledge (Kogut and Zander, 1996). Opportunistic imitators cannot easily replicate this combination, so opportunism may be of less concern to businesses than theorists assume (Malhotra, 2003).

  4. 4.

    From this viewpoint, the problem of coordinating and configuring MNCs is fundamentally solved on the base of comparative differences between countries and between the different possibilities provided by regional environments. Porter (1986, 1990), stressed the relevance of the home base of MNCs in the process of enhancing competitive advantage. Although he pointed out that global firms’ competitiveness originates from their capacity to combine advantages received from their home base with those deriving from situating specific businesses in other nations and those arising from the entire global network (Porter, 1990), his diamond model indicates that the abilities of MNCs are heavily affected by the competitive and institutional conditions of the countries of origin.

  5. 5.

    There have been few empirical studies examining the effects of social capital developed from managerial networking and social ties on a firm’s activities in emerging economies. Most having concentrated on advanced economies. The exceptions are a few studies using data from Asia (e.g., Park and Luo 2001; 2000; Lee et al. 2001). Peng and Luo’sus (2000) work, which shows that managerial networking relationships and ties with top managers at other firms and government officials help improve organizational performance in China, is the most comprehensive study of the micro–macro link in an emerging economy. This is because it is the only study to examine the ties managers develop not only with top managers of other firms but also with government officials.

References

  • Amin A (1999) An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 23(2): 365–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amsden A (1989) Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization, New York, Oxford University Press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson P (2002) Connected internationalisation processes: The case of internationalising channel intermediaries, International Business Review, 11, 365–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergara ME, Henisz WJ, Spiller PT (1998) Political institutions and electric utility investment: a crossnation analysis, California Management Review 40(2): 18–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger PL, Luckmann T (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Doubleday: Garden City, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Duguid P (2001) Knowledge and organization: a social-practice perspective, Organization Science 12: 198–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casson MC (1995) Entrepreneurship and Business Culture. England: Edward Elgar.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter R, Hodgson GM (2006) The impact of empirical tests of transaction cost economics on the debate on the nature of the firm, Strategic Management Journal 27(5): 461–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Chen T (1998) Network linkage and location choice in foreign direct investment, Journal of International Business Studies 29(3): 445–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JS (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner KR, Prahalad CK (1996) A resource-based theory of the firm: knowledge versus opportunism, Organization Science 7(5): 477–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contractor FJ (1990) Ownership patterns of U.S. joint ventures abroad and the liberalization of foreign government regulations in the 1980s: evidence from the benchmark surveys, Journal of International Business Studies 21(1): 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke P, Urgang MG, Etxebarria G (1997) Regional innovation systems: institutional and organizational dimensions, Research Policy 26(4–5): 475–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delios A, Henisz WJ (2000) Japanese firms’ investment strategies in emerging economies, Academy of Management Journal 43(3): 305–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality inorganizational fields, American Sociological Review 48(April): 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans P (1996) Government action, social capital and development: reviewing the evidence on synergy, World Development 24(6): 1119–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagre N, Wells LT (1982) Bargaining power of multinationals and host government, Journal of International Business Studies 13: 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearon JD (2003) Ethnic and cultural diversity by country, Journal of Economic Growth 8: 195–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke RH, Hofstede G, Bond MH (1991) Cultural roots of economic performance. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 12: 165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (1995) Trust: Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, Free Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon H, Anderson E (1988) The multinational corporation’s degree of control over foreign subsidiaries: An empirical test of a transaction cost explanation, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 4, 305–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat P (2001) Distance still matters: the hard reality of global expansion, Harvard Business Review 79(8): 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal S (1987) Global strategy: an organizing framework, Strategic Management Journal 8(5): 425–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press: Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Globerman S, Shapiro D (2003) Governance infrastructure and US foreign direct investment, Journal of International Business Studies, 34, 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal R, Dharwadkar R (2002) The role of the institutional environment in marketing channels, Journal of Marketing, 66, 82–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths A, Zammuto RF (2005) Institutional governance systems and variations in national competitive advantage: an integrative framework, Academy of Management Review 30(4): 823–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall RE, Jones CI (1999) Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(1): 83–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henisz WJ (2000) The institutional environment for multinational investment, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 16: 334–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henisz WJ, Williamson OE (1999) Comparative economic organization: within and between countries, Business and Politics 1(3): 261–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymer SH (1960) The international operation of national firms: a study of direct foreign investment. Ph.D. diss. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobday M (1995) Innovation in East Asia. England: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G, Deusen V, Mueller C, Charles T, and Business Goals Network (2002) What goals do business leaders pursue?, Journal of International Business Studies 33: 785–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson RE, Eden L, Lau CM, Wright M (2000) Strategy in emerging economics, Academy of Management Journal, 43, 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber GP (1991) Organizational learning: an examination of the contributing processes and the literatures, Organization Science 2: 88–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram P, Silverman B S (2002) The new institutionalism in strategic management. In: Ingram P, Silverman B S (eds), Advances in Strategic Management (Vol. 19), JAI Press: New York, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J (1965) The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Penguin: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin HH, Qian YY, Weingast BR (2005) Regional decentralization and fiscal incentives: Federalism, Chinese style, Journal of Public Economics 89(9–10): 1719–1742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston R, Soroka SN (2001) Social capital in a multicultural society: the case of Canada. In: Dekker P, Uslaner EM (eds), Social Capital and Participation in Everyday Life, Routledge: New York; pp. 30–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo RN, Bhatnagar JK (1978) Achievement orientation and occupational values: a comparative study of young French and English Canadians, Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science 12(3): 384–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna T, Rivkin JW (2001) Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets, Strategic Management Journal 22(1): 45–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna T, Palepu KG, Sinha J, Klump A, Kaji N, Sanchez L, Yacoub M (2005) Strategies that fit emerging markets, Harvard Business Review 83(6): 63–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim WC, Hwang P (1992) Global strategy and multinationals’ entry mode choice, Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1), 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knack S, Keefer P (1997) Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation, Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(4): 1251–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut B (1991) Country capabilities and the permeability of borders, Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 12: 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut B, Singh H (1988) The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode, Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut B, Zander U (1993) Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation, Journal of International Business Studies 24(4): 625–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut B, Zander U (1996) What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning, Organization Science 7(5): 502–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova T, Zaheer S (1999) Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: the case of the multinational enterprise, Academy of Management Review 24(1): 64–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuanda J, Buame S (2000) Social ties and resource leveraging strategies of small enterprises in Ghana. In: Sorensen O J, Arnould E (eds), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Marketing and Development, University of Ghana: Legon; pp. 425–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1997) Trust in large organizations, American Economic Review 87(2): 333–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall S (1992) http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/wdevel/v20y1992i2p165-186.html Technological Capabilities and Industrialization, http://ideas.repec.org/s/eee/wdevel.html World Development, Elsevier 20: 165–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecraw DJ (1984) Bargaining power, ownership, and profitability of transnational corporations in developing countries, Journal of International Business Studies 15: 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C, Lee K, Pennings JM (2001) Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study of technology-based ventures, Strategic Management Journal, June–July Special Issue 22: 615–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiblein MJ (2003) The choice of organizational governance form and performance: predictions from transaction cost, resource-based, and real options theories, Journal of Management 29(6): 937–961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung MK, Rigby D, Young T (2003) Entry of foreign banks in the People’s Republic of China: a survival analysis, Applied Economics, 35(1), 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung K, Bhagat N, Buchan N, Erez M, Gibson C (2005) Culture and international business: Recent advances and their implications for future research, Journal of International Business Studies 36: 357–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman M, Montgomery D (1988) First-mover-advantages, Strategic Management Journal, 9, 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Z, Peng MW, Yang H, Sun SL (2009) How do networks and learning drive M&As? An institutional comparison between China and the United States, Strategic Management Journal 30(10): 1113–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke RM (1995) Remaking the Italian Economy. Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • London T, Hart SL (2004) Reinventing strategies for emerging markets: beyond the transactional model, Journal of International Business Studies 35(5): 350–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love JH (1995) Knowledge, market failure and the multinational enterprise: a theoretical note, Journal of International Business Studies 26(2): 399–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu JW (2002) Intra and Inter Organisational Imitative Behaviour: Institutional Influences on Japanese Firms’ Entry Mode Choice, Journal of International Business Studies 33: 19 (19).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu JW, Xu D (2006) Growth and survival of international joint ventures: an external internal legitimacy perspective, Journal of Management 32(3): 427–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo YD (2001) Toward a cooperative view of MNC–host government relations: building blocks and performance implications, Journal of International Business Studies 32(3): 401–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo YD, Park S H (2001) Strategic alignment and performance of market-seeking MNCs in China, Strategic Management Journal 22(2): 141–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makino S, Delios A (1996) Local knowledge transfer and performance: implications for alliance formation in Asia, Journal of International Business Studies 27(5): 905–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra N (2003) The nature of knowledge and the entry mode decision, Organization Studies 24: 935–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March JG, Olsen JP (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics, Free Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutional organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony, American Journal of Sociology 80: 340–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer K E (2001) Institutions, transaction costs and entry mode choice in eastern Europe, Journal of International Business Studies 31(2): 357–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer KE, Nguyen HV (2005) Foreign investment strategies and subnational institutions in emerging markets: evidence from Vietnam, Journal of Management Studies 42(1): 63–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer KE, Estrin S, Bhaumik SK, Peng MW (2009) Institutions, resources and entry strategies in emerging economies, Strategic Management Journal 30(1): 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park SH, Luo Y (2001) Guanxi and organizational dynamics: organizational networking in Chinese firms, Strategic Management Journal 22(5): 455–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng MW (2003) Institutional transitions and strategic choices, Academy of Management Review 28(2): 275–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng MW, Luo YD (2000) Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: the nature of a micro–macro link, Academy of Management Journal 43(3): 486–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1966) The Tacit Dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1986) Competition in Global Industries, Boston, Harvard Business School Press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad CK, Lieberthal K (1998) The end of corporate imperialism, Harvard Business Review 76(4): 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam RD (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray DI (2003) Chiefs in their millennium sandals: traditional authority in Ghana—relevance, challenges and prospects. In: Tettey WJ, Puplampu KP, Berman BJ (eds), Critical Perspectives in Political and Socioeconomic Development in Ghana. African Social Studies Series, Vol. 6, Boston Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands; pp. 241–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding G (2005) The thick description and comparison of societal systems of capitalism, Journal of International Business Studies 36: 123–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig PM, Singh JV (1991) Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise, Academy of Management Review 16: 340–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott AJ, Storper M (2003) Regions, globalization, development. Regional Studies 37(6&7): 579–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott WR (1995) Institutions and Organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott WR (2001) Institutions and organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott WR, Christensen S (Eds.) (1995) The institutional construction of organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle JR (1995) The Construction of Social Reality, Free Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta N (2001) A new institutional theory of production. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1959) Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioural science, The American Economic Review, 3, 253–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternquist B (2007) International retailing (2nd ed.). New York: Fairchild.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper AJ (1995) The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies, European Urban and Regional Studies 2(3): 191–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse DF, Pan Y, Au KY (1997) How MNCs choose entry mode and form alliances: The China experience, Journal of International Business Studies, 28, 779–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tung RL (2008) The cross-cultural research imperative: the need to balance cross-national and intra-national diversity. Journal of International Business Studies 39(1): 41–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tung RL, Worm V, Fang T (2008) Sino-Western business negotiations revisited: 30 years after China’s Open Door Policy, Organizational Dynamics 37(1): 60–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanhonacker W (1997) Entering China: an unconventional approach, Harvard Business Review 75(2): 130–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vida I (2000) An empirical inquiry into international expansion of US retailers, International Marketing Review, 17(4–5), 454–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis J, Dollery B (2002) Social capital and local government capacity, Australian Journal of Public Administration 61(3): 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westney DE (1993) Institutionalization theory and the multinational corporation. In: Ghoshal S, Westney DE (eds), Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation, St Martin’s Press: New York; 53–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing (2nd ed.) Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer S, Zaheer A (1997) Country effects on information seeking in global electronic networks, Journal of International Business Studies 28(1): 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q and Li X (2010) Does Q-Theory with Investment Frictions Explain Anomalies in the Cross-Section of Returns? Journal of Financial Economics 98: 297–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang et al. (2010) The Q-Theory Approach to Understanding the Accrual Anomaly, Journal of Accounting Research, 48: 177–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy

    Manlio Del Giudice & Maria Rosaria Della Peruta

  2. School of Business, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA

    Elias G. Carayannis

Authors
  1. Manlio Del Giudice
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elias G. Carayannis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maria Rosaria Della Peruta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manlio Del Giudice .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Del Giudice, M., Carayannis, E.G., Peruta, M.R.D. (2012). Cultural Differences Across and Within Countries: Emerging Economies Matter. In: Cross-Cultural Knowledge Management. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, vol 11. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2089-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation