Abstract
Public health policies programs are to be indiscriminately accessible and fairly distributed. Their traditional agenda includes preventive and therapeutic health care services for those segments of the population that cannot afford private insurance and out-of-pocket medical expenses. To date, N. Daniels has offered the most cogent argument in favor of a right to medical care when disease impairs access to equal opportunities, but this liberal approach is unsuitable for populations where a right to health and medical care is essential but does not stand alone, for socioeconomic inequalities also occurs in education, social security, employment, and environmental issues. Public health must disaggregate sanitary and medical issues from the more general social agenda, taking specific care of disease prevention, health promotion and, for the less affluent, the provision of medical care. Resources for a national health service being always insufficient, economist will continue to search for appropriate rationing criteria, whereas bioethics advocates that rationing basic goods will inevitably create unwarranted exclusions of individuals and groups in dire need. Since there is no ethically legitimate way of justifying exclusion of the needy, bioethics will continue to insist that sufficient resources must be available to cover the medical requirements of all those uninsured and unable to finance them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, E. (1999). What is the point of equality? Ethics, 64, 287–337.
Boorse, C. (1975). On the distinction between disease and illness. Philosophy of Public Affairs, 5, 49–68.
Daniels, N. (1996). Justice and justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Day, P. (1996). Some policy analysis fallacies: A nit-picker’s guide. In P. Day, D. M. Fox, R. Maxwell, & E. Scrivens (Eds.), The State, politics and health: Essays for Rudolf Klein (pp. 187–205). Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
De Negri Filho, A. (2008). A human rights approach to quality of life and health: Applications to public health programming. Health and Human Rights, 10, 93–101.
Gable, L. (2007). The proliferation of human rights in global health governance. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 35(4), 534–544. 511.
Goldstein, K. (1995). The organism. New York: Zone Books.
Gostin, L. O., & Archer, R. (2007). The duty of States to assist other States in need: Ethics, human rights, and international law. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 35(4), 526–533. 511.
Gruskin, S., & Daniels, N. (2008). Process is the point: Justice and human rights: Priority setting and fair deliberative process. American Journal of Public Health, 98(9), 1573–1577.
Hall, J. J., & Taylor, R. (2003). Health for all beyond 2000: The demise of the Alma-Ata Declaration and primary health care in developing countries. The Medical Journal of Australia, 178(1), 17–20.
Honneth, A. (1997). Recognition and moral obligation. Social Research, 64, 16–35.
Klein, R. (1993). Dimensions of rationing: Who should do what? BMJ, 307(6899), 309–311.
Knox, E. G. (1978). Principles of allocation of health care resources. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 32(1), 3–9.
Mann, J. (1995). Human rights and the new public health. Health and Human Rights, 1(3), 229–233.
Newdick, C. (2005). Accountability for rationing—Theory into practice. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 33(4), 660–668.
Ooms, G., & Hammonds, R. (2010). Taking up Daniels’ challenge: The case for global health justice. Health and Human Rights, 12(1), 29–46.
Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion (1986). Health Promotion International, 1(4), 405–409.
Papadimos, T. J. (2007). Healthcare access as a right, not a privilege: A construct of Western thought. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 2, 2.
Persad, G., Wertheimer, A., & Emanuel, E. (2009). Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions. Lancet, 373(9661), 423–431.
Sachs, B. (2010). Lingering problems of currency and scope in Daniels’s argument for a societal obligation to meet health needs. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 35(4), 402–414.
Stein, M. S. (2002). The distribution of life-saving medical resources: Equality, life expectancy, and choice behind the veil. Social Philosophy & Policy, 19, 212–245.
Westin, S. (2008). Welfare for all—Or only for the needy? Lancet, 372(9650), 1609–1610.
Yamin, A. E. (2009). Suffering and powerlessness: The significance of promoting participation in rights-based approaches to health. Health and Human Rights, 11, 5–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Miguel Kottow
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kottow, M. (2012). Public Health and Medical Care. In: From Justice to Protection. SpringerBriefs in Public Health, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2026-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2026-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-2025-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-2026-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)